Sadly, because the uneven length of words, it becomes like this (I even shortened with 1 character):
So, sadly, this is the maximal space and character number you can fit into 2 lines.
And for Wild, I'm all for it \o/ There nothing yet that comes to my mind as not too hardly set up OTK for it, but there's a lot more class potential, like Warlock, but the best is to double innervate this at turn 5 and Living mana next turn. Okay, that might be a little too powerful. :D
True xd, the first one is ok, try to see if are still 2 lines adding an "S" to say CrystalS, if not i think it's ok to the competition
As a take on the warlocks: "this cost health instead of Mana" cards, this Shaman Card costs locked mana crystals instead of Mana. So if you have 3 locked mana crystals you can play it. the stats are similar to an Ogre Brute. My only question is: is this a fair card (stat line etc?) or am I missing something?
I would change it to 5 worthless imps. With only 1 Augmented Elekk this would shuffle 20 worthless imps into both decks and now imagine this: you cast this with arch-villain rafaam in hand, your enemy's deck is full of imps so he basically can't draw any good cards anymore and next turn you play rafaam and dominate the game. That would be unhealthy for the game. With only 5 imps, it becomes manageable.