Hearthpwn

Quote from linkblade91 >>

Quote from HyperOrange >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

Quote from HyperOrange >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

 You still have to follow the General rules, which means only one card can be submitted. I'm afraid we'll have to stick with this one, despite the "anything goes", 'cause otherwise we could be overrun by shotgun entries looking to win through sheer volume.

 Can you still make a card that has a lot of different tokens or is that against the rules as well?

 Depends on what you mean by "a lot". There is no exact limit, per se, but we definitely frown on cards that come with an extreme abundance of unique tokens.

 It would be 16 to be exact, and they would be quite unique. The idea makes sense though and I understand it's right on the line, but since this comp was kind of a freestyle I thought I'd give this wacky idea of mine a try.

 I mean...that's technically okay, but you're asking a lot of potential upvoters. I personally think they would see that wall of tokens and be put off on the sheer complexity of this card you're presenting. You're also really asking a lot of Shadows or myself, should you become a finalist, considering we have to format all of those tokens :/

 Yeah I know it's tricky. Maybe I should send my entry to you so you can tell me beforehand if it's ok to submit or not. Sounds good?

New idea:

ok, now it should be ok (I just rearranged the words so that the "1" is not alone in the last line of text)

And another idea, everyone's favorite racist Paladin, Lord Garithos (INHUMAN!):



Thoughts?

Quote from Suskis >>

ok, now it should be ok (I just rearranged the words so that the "1" is not alone in the last line of text)

Good thing that this minion is not a Demon, otherwise warlocks would have recruited him with Possessed Lackey or summon him with Voidcaller.

Sadly, I can see many other ways to cheat Sargeras out. The Boomship, Big Priest shenanigans, Fel Lord Betrug + Plot Twist, Y'Shaarj, Rage Unbound.

Quote from DestroyerR >>

I really like the idea of your card, because it cleverly depicts a person, who has recently lost a friend or a relative, but could have prevented their death. I really adore cards that tell a story.

My only problem is that the hero card might be too weak in its current state, but I can't think of a good way to improve it. Maybe increase the damage dealt to an enemy (up to 3)?

Just a small selection of the good stuff from the attic. Let me know which one you prefer and what you think balance/flavor-wise :)

Couldn't help myself, already posted it (oops). Not sure if it needs a nerf? Unleash the Hounds in mind (and other stuff), but it opens up for a control use of those cards instead of aggro.

Quote from Kovachut >>

Quote from Suskis >>

ok, now it should be ok (I just rearranged the words so that the "1" is not alone in the last line of text)

Good thing that this minion is not a Demon, otherwise warlocks would have recruited him with Possessed Lackey or summon him with Voidcaller.

Sadly, I can see many other ways to cheat Sargeras out. The Boomship, Big Priest shenanigans, Fel Lord Betrug + Plot Twist, Y'Shaarj, Rage Unbound.

 Ofc, even the old Alarm-O-Bot would work (not to mention the Naga Sea Witch). A simple taunt would block the charge but for as much as the card is just for fun, maybe the best option is to remove it. There should be plenty of options for its removal

Quote from HyperOrange >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

Quote from HyperOrange >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

Quote from HyperOrange >>

Quote from linkblade91 >>

 You still have to follow the General rules, which means only one card can be submitted. I'm afraid we'll have to stick with this one, despite the "anything goes", 'cause otherwise we could be overrun by shotgun entries looking to win through sheer volume.

 Can you still make a card that has a lot of different tokens or is that against the rules as well?

 Depends on what you mean by "a lot". There is no exact limit, per se, but we definitely frown on cards that come with an extreme abundance of unique tokens.

 It would be 16 to be exact, and they would be quite unique. The idea makes sense though and I understand it's right on the line, but since this comp was kind of a freestyle I thought I'd give this wacky idea of mine a try.

 I mean...that's technically okay, but you're asking a lot of potential upvoters. I personally think they would see that wall of tokens and be put off on the sheer complexity of this card you're presenting. You're also really asking a lot of Shadows or myself, should you become a finalist, considering we have to format all of those tokens :/

 Yeah I know it's tricky. Maybe I should send my entry to you so you can tell me beforehand if it's ok to submit or not. Sounds good?

 Nothing to worry about in the end, I'm going to submit something way simpler instead. I think it's better to leave my overcomplicated idea for another time.

Quote from Kovachut >>

Quote from DestroyerR >>

I really like the idea of your card, because it cleverly depicts a person, who has recently lost a friend or a relative, but could have prevented their death. I really adore cards that tell a story.

My only problem is that the hero card might be too weak in its current state, but I can't think of a good way to improve it. Maybe increase the damage dealt to an enemy (up to 3)?

 I have a feeling that would be OP, since it would mean a 6 damage HP on total every turn. Thanks for the feedback though!

Quote from DestroyerR >>

Quote from Kovachut >>

Quote from DestroyerR >>

I really like the idea of your card, because it cleverly depicts a person, who has recently lost a friend or a relative, but could have prevented their death. I really adore cards that tell a story.

My only problem is that the hero card might be too weak in its current state, but I can't think of a good way to improve it. Maybe increase the damage dealt to an enemy (up to 3)?

 I have a feeling that would be OP, since it would mean a 6 damage HP on total every turn. Thanks for the feedback though!

Yeah, but you would also take damage from the visions, so doesn't this compensate the effect? Also, the targeted enemy is random, which means your HP is not really reliable against wide boards, and the visions occupy board spaces. I can imagine the situation, when you don't want to push the button, but you will be forced to in order to free more space for future minions. This is why I am confident your card needs a small buff, but it will be a good idea to hear out other people because I'm not really sure how it should be done. Maybe the visions should deal only 1 damage to your hero?

Quote from CheeseEtc >>

http://hearthcards.net/cards/2be35fbc.png

Is it too racy for a WCDC? It's my most upvoted card on hcards.net

I'd smack that (upvote).

On a serious note, I don't find the art to be too provocative for Hearthpwn standards, because the most important thing here is the flavour and that succubus just improves the card in this regard. Not to mention, the effect of the spell fits its name extremely well. I find the design to be innovative and the joke - funny. Some users here may see this as a problem and won't give you an upvote, but you shouldn't worry about them imho, because I think the majority here will appreciate your efforts. It's not always easy to find the line between a clever joke (that features erotic motives) and a sleezy oversexual one. I'd Tap That, at least for me, is a nice example of the first scenario, whereas Fifty Shades of Purple kinda falls into the second category.

Need some text help. Trying to convey that all cards in your hand and deck that didn't start there get transformed, but don't want to alter either opponent or the board. Its a relatively simple action, but it seems like it requires too much text for a clean hearthstone card. Is what I have easy enough to understand? What would be better?

Meant to be a counter to bomb warrior, boost to Bronze Herald, and retry for a bad Archivist Elysiana