(Maybe the Battlecry should read: "Your opponent Discover a tragic fate at the start of the next turn". In this way we didn't break the rules of Hearthstone - about opponent activity in own turn.)
the player casting Madam Lazul should choose the deathrattle. Otherwise letting your opponent choose one is way worse for a 8 mana 6/6. Overall is too much weaker than kalimos.
Yeah, a little bit. Maybe in-game it would get a little more understandable. In a world, where cards like the Lich King exist, I've tought this one can get a chance too.
your opponent shouldnt do anything during your turn
Yeah, that's a bigger problem for the card. If they would let this ruke break, Hearthstone would be a real-time game. That's why I suggested the following: (Maybe the Battlecry should read: "Your opponent Discover a tragic fate at the start of the next turn". In this way we didn't break the rules of Hearthstone - about opponent activity in own turn.)
Let your opponent decide his own fate...
What do you think?
(Maybe the Battlecry should read: "Your opponent Discover a tragic fate at the start of the next turn". In this way we didn't break the rules of Hearthstone - about opponent activity in own turn.)
Obey C'Thun, Praise The Darkness, Pet Hakkar, the Soulflayer, Love Yogg-Saron, Hope's End
Discovers* sorry xD
Skidaddle skidoodle your Milhouse manastorm is now a noodle
Too complicated.
Cool idea but you need a hero power + Lazul is only gonna be a cosmetic portrait.
your opponent shouldnt do anything during your turn
the player casting Madam Lazul should choose the deathrattle. Otherwise letting your opponent choose one is way worse for a 8 mana 6/6. Overall is too much weaker than kalimos.
Ouch, my English strikes again :D
Obey C'Thun, Praise The Darkness, Pet Hakkar, the Soulflayer, Love Yogg-Saron, Hope's End
Make it ‘at the beginning of your opponents next turn they discover...’
At least there you’ll not break any HS rules.