Basically, it's like the actual definition of Vice Versa, how it goes both ways. Some Examples below:
Basically how Vice Versa would work is that Destroy this minion if it attacks a beast. (There could probably be better wording here, but you guys get what I'm saying.)
How Vice Versa works on this card is that when your opponent draws a card, deal to damage to its character.
I feel like Vice Versa would work, I'm just not great at the wording part of it, however, if someone could word the cards better than myself it could make sense. Could this see print, probably not but it was a little idea I had, It would probably take a lot of coding too. Thoughts below thanks!
This is super clunky. I read it like 3 times and I’m still confused on what you’re trying to do.
Is it optional for both players? The wording seems like it’s optional. If it’s not why does this need to be a keyword? For example your second card could just say, “Whenever a player draws a card, they take 2 damage.”
using can implies its a choice, but both these cards are written as automatic effects.
If I understand the mechanic its wording should be "This applies to both players", the first card is a bad example of this as its just situational poisonous and is just "if a beast attacks this both minions die", the 2nd is better with the effect of "when you draw a card take 2 damage".
using can implies its a choice, but both these cards are written as automatic effects.
If I understand the mechanic its wording should be "This applies to both players", the first card is a bad example of this as its just situational poisonous and is just "if a beast attacks this both minions die", the 2nd is better with the effect of "when you draw a card take 2 damage".
your right about the first card reading it over it is kind of confusing, maybe if it had the wording "Destroy any minion that attacks this minion" AKA poisonous but your not the attacker, and the Vice Versa effect basically makes it that you can't attack an opponent with that minion or else it basically self destructs
Basically, it's like the actual definition of Vice Versa, how it goes both ways. Some Examples below:
Basically how Vice Versa would work is that Destroy this minion if it attacks a beast. (There could probably be better wording here, but you guys get what I'm saying.)
How Vice Versa works on this card is that when your opponent draws a card, deal to damage to its character.
I feel like Vice Versa would work, I'm just not great at the wording part of it, however, if someone could word the cards better than myself it could make sense. Could this see print, probably not but it was a little idea I had, It would probably take a lot of coding too. Thoughts below thanks!
This is super clunky. I read it like 3 times and I’m still confused on what you’re trying to do.
Is it optional for both players? The wording seems like it’s optional. If it’s not why does this need to be a keyword? For example your second card could just say, “Whenever a player draws a card, they take 2 damage.”
using can implies its a choice, but both these cards are written as automatic effects.
If I understand the mechanic its wording should be "This applies to both players", the first card is a bad example of this as its just situational poisonous and is just "if a beast attacks this both minions die", the 2nd is better with the effect of "when you draw a card take 2 damage".
For the second card the vice versa effect could also be "Whenever you deal 2 damage to your hero draw a card" so definitely it's ambiguous
your right about the first card reading it over it is kind of confusing, maybe if it had the wording "Destroy any minion that attacks this minion" AKA poisonous but your not the attacker, and the Vice Versa effect basically makes it that you can't attack an opponent with that minion or else it basically self destructs
Sorry, but this is one of the worst mechanics anyone came up with, ever.
- Click Here To Join Us On Discord! -
thanks