Hearthpwn

This Week's Finalists

Competition-Specific Restrictions:

• You must make a card that doubles something; what it doubles is up to you!
• It cannot be a Legendary card.

We have whittled down ~100 valid submissions to just 12 of the community's favorites. 
Check out all the finalists below and vote in our poll (vote for as many or as few as you like) to help decide the winner and be sure to check back after the poll finishes for the announcement of the winner and the start of a new theme!

by  SolutionXD
by  Hieii
by  CasmX
by  AngryChicken

by  RazorOfArtorias
by  linkblade91
by  Fabman650
by  Wailor

by  Biddio92
by  DemonicPlushie
by  Sinti
by  biggerbossman

dang i was so sure id at least qualify this time DX ah well.

Voting for good Listener I dig that card and wish it was legit, art and all! 11/10 would 2x golden craft!

My first time in a final, thanks to everyone!

My picks for this week are going to be Good Listener and Unexpected Heroes for their flavour (and Good Listener being pretty dang strong in and of itself), and OppressorBot, since low attack values is the major weakness of Magnetize minions, so amplified damage when on the offensive clears that up.

I really like Mutating Monstrosity, so voting for that of course. Though I have to wonder what would happen if its stats were ever equal...

Quote from Lathy >

I'm surprised "Druid of Exploration" was not disqualified. It's a not functional card? Should be a Battlecry. If it's intended as a one-time trigger each turn (and not just a one-time trigger which I presume), it should be "Your first Choose One each turn becomes..."

It's also nonsensical for the transforming Druid minions. Those Choose One effects don't stack, so would those minions just have to transform twice? Or would each one get two more tokens besides the Fandral one? It's completely unclear.

My guess is that the real competition will be between Sinister Feline and Good Listener. Anyway, congratulation to all the finalists.

another great card design competition

Quote from Schlauchneid >>

All but one are rares. hmmmm

 Epics, actually. High powered doubling effects just seems like an "Epic" level card effect in terms of complexity.

Unexpected Heroes, easily! That card reminds me so much of one of my favorite MgT cards, Orcish Settlers :D

CG to all who made it, some nice designs here :)

I just have one question, not trying to be mean or anything, just trying to understand this: does "Seek'em" have any meaning or is this phrase generally used too? i thought it was "sic'em". Was that done on purpose to "hearthstone" it? Or could be lost in translation (which is fine), but it just looks very weird to me, so i wanted to know what is the meaning behind wording it like that, thats all :)

I just loved the Harpy. It looks like something which is not broken and at the same time, is a very powerful card. Would love to play it

Congrats to our winner! Next Discussion Topic is up now.

CG CG :)

Quote from Wailor >>

Quote from Sinti >>

CG to all who made it, some nice designs here :)

I just have one question, not trying to be mean or anything, just trying to understand this: does "Seek'em" have any meaning or is this phrase generally used too? i thought it was "sic'em". Was that done on purpose to "hearthstone" it? Or could be lost in translation (which is fine), but it just looks very weird to me, so i wanted to know what is the meaning behind wording it like that, thats all :)

 I've just seen your comment. What's more, I've just realised I made it to the final poll :_D

I've just checked it and you're right, it was supposed to be "Sic'em". The thing is, I'm not a native English speaker and I thought the command was an abbreviated form of "Seek them", so I wrote it "Seek'em".

Now my doubt is... where does sic'em come from?

As it turnes out, it was derived from the word seek, so you might have been correct all along :D

http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2016/03/say-sic-get-dogs-attack/

... or mby not, just read the comment under the article that gives a different explanation :o