Hearthpwn

Quote from ffinderous >>

A weird idea with awful art and wording which only works in the choose card phase... I need some help guys. XD.

Quote from Sinti >>

Quote from nurgling13 >>

Here's what I got so far:

Ultimate Evolution: yeah, its ok. I like that it can interact with Searing Totem at least too :)

Arena Referee: i dont like it, but its ok for the prompt i guess. 

Quote from xOwleyex >>

Just came up with some idea, what do you guys think about them. Really love to get some feedback too :D

A really great card to combo with Crackling Doom or any overload card. Just remember to pick some and keep some.

Just simply giving Rogue some value trade mid and late game. I'm also thinking about making him a 4/1 with Stealth making him a lil harder for remove but limit his damage output from auto attack.

Beast is quite popular in Arena and are not limited to Hunter or Druid at all. Some reasonable targets can be Violet Wurm and Charged Devilsaur, however, a 3/3 Stoneskin Basilik or 4/5 Plated Beetle are not bad at all. In the worse cases, it can still be pool man Bonemare.

As long as it's not in your starting hand, you will always draw it on turn 1. I'm thinking about giving him 1/1 instead of 1/2 but it's Arena exclusive so...whaever...

Dont use art from existing cards, its generally frowned upon and considered very lazy (i get why u used them now, but still). Also post smaller images, thanks :)

Snowfriendly Giant: i dont like it, too similar to its original.

Saurok Assassin: now this is a good card for the prompt. But change the art.

Lakkari Tamer: overly complicated.

Mooligan Champion: i suppose its ok, but not very exciting. 

I had a similar idea to this for a custom class, but I think it might fit here?

Quote from SideItem >>

I had a similar idea to this for a custom class, but I think it might fit here?

What about these ones?

Hey guys, needing some more feedback. I just came up with the final version of my previous Saurok Assassin. Which one do you think better? The 2nd one can be problematic to deal with, but very vulnerable to small AOE damage while the 1st one can be cleared fast with some ping but can deal reasonable amount of damage while it's in play.
Art credit: https://www.artstation.com/paradidlle

How about my idea? A solid drop that promised you could play it on turn 3. 

(if you have more than 1 copies of this card, only one card will draw (unless you are using card draw at turn 3) i.e

Mulligan: You may get a Felbat in your starting hand

Turn 1: You may get a Felbat when drawing card

Turn 2: You may get a Felbat when drawing card

Turn 3: You are drawing Felbat, If you use other card or hero power, and you have another felbat in your deck, The card you draw will be Felbat.

So I'm kind of trash at Arena, meaning that my feedback is probably not very useful, meaning I won't be doing much in the way of mass-feedback posts like I've been trying to do lately. That being said, I can speak in more general terms regarding my opinion of the theme and the direction some have gone:

1. I think creating a minion is a trap, one that's not really in the spirit of the competition. None of the Arena-only cards that were recently added are minions, and none of the options were minions. Sinti and I already spoke on this, but it's too late to change things. With zero examples we can use for reference, "Arena-only minions" are going to be inherently difficult to balance and are readily too good or too crap.

2. "Do X for each game you've lost this run" should be avoided. Your current opponent has nothing to do with your losses; the game is basically punishing them for being matched up against someone who lost a game/two games prior to their arrival. If such a card has enough strength to help decide a game, then you've A. added another example of "RNG" being overly impactful (this time, the strength of cards being predetermined by matchmaking), and B. soured the experience in general, because your opponent has no way to counterplay the past.

@linkblade91 then how do you think about weapon card? I know that none of the Arena exclusive cards is weapon but in general it should have the same impact in the game with spell cards.

Quote from linkblade91 >>

So I'm kind of trash at Arena, meaning that my feedback is probably not very useful, meaning I won't be doing much in the way of mass-feedback posts like I've been trying to do lately. That being said, I can speak in more general terms regarding my opinion of the theme and the direction some have gone:

1. I think creating a minion is a trap, one that's not really in the spirit of the competition. None of the Arena-only cards that were recently added are minions, and none of the options were minions. Sinti and I already spoke on this, but it's too late to change things. With zero examples we can use for reference, "Arena-only minions" are going to be inherently difficult to balance and are readily too good or too crap.

2. "Do X for each game you've lost this run" should be avoided. Your current opponent has nothing to do with your losses; the game is basically punishing them for being matched up against someone who lost a game/two games prior to their arrival. If such a card has enough strength to help decide a game, then you've A. added another example of "RNG" being overly impactful (this time, the strength of cards being predetermined by matchmaking), and B. soured the experience in general, because your opponent has no way to counterplay the past.

Quote from ffinderous >>

  So minion cards is not count this time?

Quote from Redqueen >>

 

Quote from linkblade91 >>

self-snip

 I think minions are acceptable, although all the current arena cards are spell or weapon, a minion only for the arena is possible. In past time, there are some minions are very strong in the arena, such as North Sea Kraken. I will say it is an  "arena card" example.

 

Quote from Cogito_Ergo_Sum >>

Quote from xOwleyex >>

I know that none of the Arena exclusive cards is weapon...

Quote from Lathy >>