Hearthpwn

My votes for this phase go to the Berserker, Summoner, and Geomancer. =)

Looking through this, I'm actually rather happy with almost all of these. I'm voting for Geomancer, Apothecary and Chef... And mine, but I won't admit that.

There's still an issue on this topic, so just in case: my cards.

IIRC I promised a review that did'nt come 2 days ago so sorry. The submissions are still good though, it's phase 4 after all.

Quote from Broeck1 >>

 Summoner by maxlot
I think the summoner is great overall and can only find some nitty gritty stuff that could be improved. Invoke is a great keyword because it provides versatility, though it isn't used enough in my eyes. The artwork used is good but a little all over the place (the style difference in say Squeak Freak and Savage Anger is just too big). Also, the Hero Portrait is pretty bad to be honest. It's too dark, too shiny, too small, don't like it. Other than that, the class is cool and promising.

Well done to everyone this round.  It doesn't look like I will make it to the next so good luck to those that do.

Quote from Broeck1 >>

Quote from maxlot >>

 

Quote from Broeck1 >>

 Summoner by maxlot
I think the summoner is great overall and can only find some nitty gritty stuff that could be improved. Invoke is a great keyword because it provides versatility, though it isn't used enough in my eyes. The artwork used is good but a little all over the place (the style difference in say Squeak Freak and Savage Anger is just too big). Also, the Hero Portrait is pretty bad to be honest. It's too dark, too shiny, too small, don't like it. Other than that, the class is cool and promising.

Too small?! WHAT DO Y- *scrolls up*

Well, it appears I may have messed up a little bit. For my submissions I've been copy and pasting previous ones and switching out cards and such. I updated my hero power portrait pretty early into this comp when I realized that it was simply too small, but I've never actually remembered to replace it in the submissions.

Does this look any better? Anyway, I'll try and improve it further a little bit today, and thank you for your kind words about the class and for doing this for us in general.

Yes, that's better, but to be completely honest, I don't like the art itself.. It's just too dark for my taste. Also, when looking at the Hearthstone hero portraits, you can see that they are positioned in the same way (https://hearthstone.gamepedia.com/Hero). With the Shaman (a little skewed) and Priest (small) as exceptions, all hero art nearly cover the entire portrait and have a lot of their body outside the portrait. They are all really colorful as well. The hero portrait is very important for your class, since it's the first thing viewers see (also on the front page). 

Btw, my hero portrait isnt really good either, I should have zoomed in a little more...

Quote from Broeck1 >>

Time Traveler by Demonxz95
This is the first phase I actually thing the Time Traveler might have a shot a reaching the finals. To be honest, I was a bit sceptical about the class at first. Mainly because of the keyword (still don't really like it) and because the Quick-Time keyword seemed to niche. When looking at the submission this phase, I think Demonxz95 really stepped up his game (though Quick-Time could be used more!). Cards like Power of Yogg Saron show how Quick-Time can be really interesting. I love Murozond and Dark Replication is absolutely stunning (why isn't this a showcase card?!). The class shows some really interesting concepts and ideas.

 

Quote from Broeck1 >>

Important life lesson right back at you: when someone says something positive about you dont focus on the negative used to substantiate his reasoning. I just said I thought you might have a shot a reaching the final four because your class is awesome?!

Quote from Broeck1>>

Quote from maxlot>>

Quote from Broeck1>>

Quote from maxlot>>

Quote from Broeck1>>

Summoner by maxlot
I think the summoner is great overall and can only find some nitty gritty stuff that could be improved. Invoke is a great keyword because it provides versatility, though it isn't used enough in my eyes. The artwork used is good but a little all over the place (the style difference in say Squeak Freak and Savage Anger is just too big). Also, the Hero Portrait is pretty bad to be honest. It's too dark, too shiny, too small, don't like it. Other than that, the class is cool and promising.

Too small?! WHAT DO Y- *scrolls up*

Well, it appears I may have messed up a little bit. For my submissions I've been copy and pasting previous ones and switching out cards and such. I updated my hero power portrait pretty early into this comp when I realized that it was simply too small, but I've never actually remembered to replace it in the submissions.

Does this look any better? Anyway, I'll try and improve it further a little bit today, and thank you for your kind words about the class and for doing this for us in general.

Yes, that's better, but to be completely honest, I don't like the art itself.. It's just too dark for my taste. Also, when looking at the Hearthstone hero portraits, you can see that they are positioned in the same way (https://hearthstone.gamepedia.com/Hero). With the Shaman (a little skewed) and Priest (small) as exceptions, all hero art nearly cover the entire portrait and have a lot of their body outside the portrait. They are all really colorful as well. The hero portrait is very important for your class, since it's the first thing viewers see (also on the front page). 

Btw, my hero portrait isnt really good either, I should have zoomed in a little more...

 Well, I edited my post and put in some other versions I could use, though I'll have to zoom in a little more maybe. Do you like either of those? They're less dark.

 I like the first one best, maybe zoom in a little more and I might be starting to think its good :D