This thread was marked as Locked by Asylum_Rhapsody.

Weekly Card Design Competition 3.07 [Submission Topic]

  • #51 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Under Review: Awkwardly worded? Seems to be so deliberately to fit within the limits. Work on this and PM us?
  • #52 (Explorers)
  • #53 (Explorers)
  • #54 (Explorers)
  • #55 (Explorers)
  • #57 (Explorers)
  • #59 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (ShadowsOfSense) : Under Review: Arguably uses strange wording to subvert the 9 word restriction. "Take damage equal to it's attack." not "Take it's damage."
  • #60 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Under Review: Deliberately awkward wording.
  • #62 (Explorers)
  • #63 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Under Review: Mechanically non-functional?
  • #64 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Under Review: Questionably worded. "minion count" is vague. PM us to discuss?
  • #65 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Under Review: Why "Heal for 4"? That's inconsistent with Hearthstone wording, should be "Restore 4 Health".
  • #66 (Explorers)
  • #67 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Under Review: "Attacking out of Stealth" is awkward and vague.
  • #69 (Explorers)
  • #70 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Should this be symmetrical?
  • #73 (Explorers)
  • #74 (Explorers)
  • #75 (Explorers)
  • #77 (Explorers)
    Public Mod Note (Asylum_Rhapsody) : Superfluous wording? The second turn is your turn, so they wouldn't be able to attack anyway. "Next turn" would be sufficient.
  • To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Posts Quoted:
Reply
Clear All Quotes

Jump to Forum