And stop claiming that 0 mana 1\1 would be broken. It is a groundless claim. Name me ONE tier 4+ deck (standard or wild) in which it would be an autoinclude. Or some new broken archetype that could emerge.
I didn't mean to claim it, I just quoted almost everyone :P and asked for a solution. I think you're totally right
How about a 1 mana 1/2 amalgam instead? 0 mana card play is a curse. In my opinion no card should be reduced to 0 mana in the first place and to create a 0 mana card should therefore be an exception. An such a powerful card for 0 mana can break a lot of things because mots tribal decks have a super strong early game. They should in general should stop printing 0 mana cards or "reduce cost" cards.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"... but not less than (1)" is needed now more than ever!
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I didn't mean to claim it, I just quoted almost everyone :P and asked for a solution. I think you're totally right
How about a 1 mana 1/2 amalgam instead? 0 mana card play is a curse. In my opinion no card should be reduced to 0 mana in the first place and to create a 0 mana card should therefore be an exception. An such a powerful card for 0 mana can break a lot of things because mots tribal decks have a super strong early game. They should in general should stop printing 0 mana cards or "reduce cost" cards.
"... but not less than (1)" is needed now more than ever!