Dude his play was definitely Foxy Fraud + Edwin + prep + swindle + shadowstep + coin + edwin on the same turn for a 14/14 edwin. The history bar shows it all. What are you talking about?
Its in-line with the history bar. However there is an inconsistency here because it is stated the word Other in Edwin VanCleef so it should have been a 12/12.
Dude his play was definitely Foxy Fraud + Edwin + prep + swindle + shadowstep + coin + edwin on the same turn for a 14/14 edwin. The history bar shows it all. What are you talking about?
Its in-line with the history bar. However there is an inconsistency here because it is stated the word Other in Edwin VanCleef so it should have been a 12/12.
there is no inconsistency here, in this context the word "other" means actually every other card played this turn, not other than(!) Edwin
I think it is pretty clear what happened: Turn 3: Foxy - Edwin (4/4) - Prep - Swindle - Shadowstep - Coin - Edwin (14/14) which checks out fully. 6 cards played before the last Edwin means he gets a +12/+12 for a final 14/14.
Even if - and i just advanced a round while not playing anything -, it states "for every OTHER card". Your calculation is 10+2=12 and not 14 So either this is a huge translation fuckup or just a plain logical error.
Misunderstanding a card is fine. Most, if not all, of us have been there.
Posting about it is also fine. It can help you learn.
LYING and refusing to accept peoples' explanations for bullshit reasons is not ok.
Your screenshot proves that it is turn 3. That makes it impossible for the opponent to have played Foxy Fraud + Edwin on the previous turn while keeping the coin.
It is clear that the opponent played FF + Edwin + prep + spell + step + coin before the final Van'Cleef, all in onw turn. That is six cards in that same turn, so +12/+12 on his base 2/2 stats.
The only miscommunication in the card's text is that it is not clear that it also accounts for previous versions of Van'Cleef as an "other" card. It is not a bug. It is not a mistake. It is a minor detail.
Its in-line with the history bar. However there is an inconsistency here because it is stated the word Other in Edwin VanCleef so it should have been a 12/12.
there is no inconsistency here, in this context the word "other" means actually every other card played this turn, not other than(!) Edwin
I think it is pretty clear what happened: Turn 3: Foxy - Edwin (4/4) - Prep - Swindle - Shadowstep - Coin - Edwin (14/14) which checks out fully. 6 cards played before the last Edwin means he gets a +12/+12 for a final 14/14.
Other card simply means all cards before the Combo, doesn't matter if it would include other Edwin.
If a single thread can embody everything that the heartpwn boards are, then this is that thread. Merry Christmas everybody.
Misunderstanding a card is fine. Most, if not all, of us have been there.
Posting about it is also fine. It can help you learn.
LYING and refusing to accept peoples' explanations for bullshit reasons is not ok.
Your screenshot proves that it is turn 3. That makes it impossible for the opponent to have played Foxy Fraud + Edwin on the previous turn while keeping the coin.
It is clear that the opponent played FF + Edwin + prep + spell + step + coin before the final Van'Cleef, all in onw turn. That is six cards in that same turn, so +12/+12 on his base 2/2 stats.
The only miscommunication in the card's text is that it is not clear that it also accounts for previous versions of Van'Cleef as an "other" card. It is not a bug. It is not a mistake. It is a minor detail.
THIS IS 2020 AND YOU STILL DON’T KNOW HOW EDWIN WORKS? Smol bren taym
Mulluk has an account in hearthpwn for over 4 years and doesn't know how Edwin works holly shit.
Rank silver for ever i guess
Guys, pretty sure this dude is trolling you all and you completely fell into his bait
Click here to see my custom pirate adventure, The Treasures of VanCleef! https://www.hearthpwn.com/forums/hearthstone-general/fan-creations/240766-expansion-competition-the-treasures-of-vancleef
Dunning-Kruger Effect