I don't like it, it is not nice to look at someone's hand. I know it is not that a critical card but I despise that someone looks at my hand. It should just give a card, make it 1 mana less cost I don't care, just don't look at my hand. To see 3 cards can make you play different.
I don't like it, it is not nice to look at someone's hand. I know it is not that a critical card but I despise that someone looks at my hand. It should just give a card, make it 1 mana less cost I don't care, just don't look at my hand. To see 3 cards can make you play different.
Dude STFU and be happy it is legendary.
Imagine she would be epic or even rare.
"it is not nice" LOL
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
EU 11/2015+ , f2p 03/2021+: DK 63/ DH 205 /Dr 277 / Hu 733 / Ma 6666 / Pa 1072 / Pr 1165 / Ro 1791 / Sh 1303 / Wl 707 / Wr 664
I completely agree, she’s really bad mannered. You should never look at someone’s hand nor what’s in his or her plate at dinner. Also don’t pick your nose in public. Just rude.
The replies are salt, not my opinion. Most likely priests, I hate it when a priest sees my 2x pyro and Naga. This means he or she will do anything to not get below 20, it immediatly kills a suprise otk because he or she has seen my hand. Same counts for any other card that has been seen, only a shuffle deck and secret passage counters it somewhat.
If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand, make the card 1 cost less I don't care, but don't show my hand.
If it was meant to be shown we would playing with the cards showing.
Just my 2 cents.
PS: To the few who write STFU, FU, who do you think you are telling me what I can think or say, go to China where no opinions are wanted.
"If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand"
No. If that's what we want, we'll play Mind Vision. We play Madame Lazul to find out what you have in your hand, and then take one of those. The information gained is the whole point. If you don't want someone to see your Pyro/Pyro/Naga, then you should do anything to not get below 4 cards in hand.
And honestly, if I'm playing Lazul, it means I'm also probably playing Chameleos. I've been spying on your hand the entire game, and you don't even know how much I know about your hand.
You're not entitled to a surprise OTK. You don't deserve it. And you're not guaranteed to get it, even if you have the cards in hand. Sometimes your plans don't work. That's Hearthstone.
The hate for priest is unreal - I get the hate hype for ressurect priest cause that was or maybe still is cancer in wild, but come on priest is a fun class that can steal your opponents tools at random which comes with a risk if you havent prayed to rngsus
To say Madame Lazul "ruins" surprise OTKs is a strange argument against the card. While you don't know your opponent's hand, you also should recognize an OTK deck based on what your opponent has played. While knowledge of your opponent's hand is absolutely helpful, you're making it sound like it's some kind of toxic card. In a world of Guardian Animals, Illucia, Secret Passage, Solarian Prime, etc. choosing Madame Lazul as your hill to die on is an odd choice.
While I can understand Priest being annoying to play again, mostly because they are heavy on value and control cards, there isn't even a top tier priest deck in the meta right now. It's like complaining about Warlock or something. Leave the poor guys alone.
The replies are salt, not my opinion. Most likely priests, I hate it when a priest sees my 2x pyro and Naga. This means he or she will do anything to not get below 20, it immediatly kills a suprise otk because he or she has seen my hand. Same counts for any other card that has been seen, only a shuffle deck and secret passage counters it somewhat.
If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand, make the card 1 cost less I don't care, but don't show my hand.
If it was meant to be shown we would playing with the cards showing.
Just my 2 cents.
PS: To the few who write STFU, FU, who do you think you are telling me what I can think or say, go to China where no opinions are wanted.
What do you mean by 'if it was meant'? Are you saying the card isn't meant to do this or the game isn't meant to have this mechanic? Neither are true, however much you want to hold on to the opinion that you're correct, you simply aren't.
This is a game, designed by people who implement the rules of the game. They designed this card and so you are 'meant' to be able to this action. They specifically designed it to do so.
By your own logic you should be fine with this then because it is intended.
No one is telling you what you should think or say but you must realise that the more stupid or asinine the thing someone says is, the more it will be dismissed and/or ridiculed. You have the right to think stupid things and other people have the right to treat them as such. If you encounter this a lot then the answer isn't to send everyone to China, it's likely that it's you and the way you articulate your point or the process you follow to come to conclusions that are needing to change. This does come across as a pointless whinge thread and exactly the type of post that should go on the salt thread. Why didn't you put it there? Are you needing attention and feel a new thread is more likely to deliver on that front?
The replies are salt, not my opinion. Most likely priests, I hate it when a priest sees my 2x pyro and Naga. This means he or she will do anything to not get below 20, it immediatly kills a suprise otk because he or she has seen my hand. Same counts for any other card that has been seen, only a shuffle deck and secret passage counters it somewhat.
If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand, make the card 1 cost less I don't care, but don't show my hand.
If it was meant to be shown we would playing with the cards showing.
Just my 2 cents.
PS: To the few who write STFU, FU, who do you think you are telling me what I can think or say, go to China where no opinions are wanted.
What do you mean by 'if it was meant'? Are you saying the card isn't meant to do this or the game isn't meant to have this mechanic? Neither are true, however much you want to hold on to the opinion that you're correct, you simply aren't.
This is a game, designed by people who implement the rules of the game. They designed this card and so you are 'meant' to be able to this action. They specifically designed it to do so.
By your own logic you should be fine with this then because it is intended.
No one is telling you what you should think or say but you must realise that the more stupid or asinine the thing someone says is, the more it will be dismissed and/or ridiculed. You have the right to think stupid things and other people have the right to treat them as such. If you encounter this a lot then the answer isn't to send everyone to China, it's likely that it's you and the way you articulate your point or the process you follow to come to conclusions that are needing to change. This does come across as a pointless whinge thread and exactly the type of post that should go on the salt thread. Why didn't you put it there? Are you needing attention and feel a new thread is more likely to deliver on that front?
This must be the longest BS I have read in a while.
Most likely this will be a waste of time due to your limitations but there is always hope.
"This is a game, designed by people who implement the rules of the game. They designed this card and so you are 'meant' to be able to this action."
They designed a well number of cards which they nerf or change all the time, why do they do that you think? If they thought out everything that good then there would be no need for changes at all, but there are, so this comment is BS.
"This does come across as a pointless whinge thread and exactly the type of post that should go on the salt thread."
Salt is for nerf cryings, I claim a mechanic of a card is not well thought, I don't like it my hand is seen, if it's a secret in my hand for example trying to figure out and play against a secret is different then when you simply know what the secret is. Even if the designers intended they intended wrong in my opinion or they intended for the wrong reasons. So again this is something you are assuming but not a fact, meaning it is BS.
"If you encounter this a lot then the answer isn't to send everyone to China, it's likely that it's you and the way you articulate your point or the process you follow to come to conclusions that are needing to change."
There are always and will be people trying to discourage opinions or trying to silence others by throwing out foul words, let's call it trying to oppress opinions. China does the same, a very suitable environment for oppressors.
What we have to do here is to agree that we disagree. This is perfectly normal, but don't go patronizing. The forums are lively because of opinions and discussions.
Lul the priest hate movement is really getting stupid now. Whats next, hero power is op?
Its OK when other classes card wording are mentioned as complaint, but as soon as someone mention an actual broken class like in this case, it turns to "PrIeSt HaTe MoVeMeNt" and "sAlT ThReAd" in replies.
If you want to be taken seriously, avoid saying stuff like "I don't like this", "I despise", "it's not nice". Instead, use something more along the lines of "it's not fun to play against", "it's uninteractive", "it's unbalanced" (regardless of that being true or not).
I don't like it, it is not nice to look at someone's hand. I know it is not that a critical card but I despise that someone looks at my hand. It should just give a card, make it 1 mana less cost I don't care, just don't look at my hand. To see 3 cards can make you play different.
=> Salt thread dude :D
Illucia is fine then? I just take your hand and dump everything. Sounds right. :-)
Always expect the unexpectable!
ah yes, information is OP
Lul the priest hate movement is really getting stupid now. Whats next, hero power is op?
Dude STFU and be happy it is legendary.
Imagine she would be epic or even rare.
"it is not nice" LOL
EU 11/2015+ , f2p 03/2021+: DK 63 / DH 205 /Dr 277 / Hu 733 / Ma 6666 / Pa 1072 / Pr 1165 / Ro 1791 / Sh 1303 / Wl 707 / Wr 664
I completely agree, she’s really bad mannered. You should never look at someone’s hand nor what’s in his or her plate at dinner. Also don’t pick your nose in public. Just rude.
Take a walk on the wild side...
The replies are salt, not my opinion. Most likely priests, I hate it when a priest sees my 2x pyro and Naga. This means he or she will do anything to not get below 20, it immediatly kills a suprise otk because he or she has seen my hand. Same counts for any other card that has been seen, only a shuffle deck and secret passage counters it somewhat.
If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand, make the card 1 cost less I don't care, but don't show my hand.
If it was meant to be shown we would playing with the cards showing.
Just my 2 cents.
PS: To the few who write STFU, FU, who do you think you are telling me what I can think or say, go to China where no opinions are wanted.
"If it's a card from someone's hand they are after then just rng them a card from the hand"
No. If that's what we want, we'll play Mind Vision. We play Madame Lazul to find out what you have in your hand, and then take one of those. The information gained is the whole point. If you don't want someone to see your Pyro/Pyro/Naga, then you should do anything to not get below 4 cards in hand.
And honestly, if I'm playing Lazul, it means I'm also probably playing Chameleos. I've been spying on your hand the entire game, and you don't even know how much I know about your hand.
You're not entitled to a surprise OTK. You don't deserve it. And you're not guaranteed to get it, even if you have the cards in hand. Sometimes your plans don't work. That's Hearthstone.
The hate for priest is unreal - I get the hate hype for ressurect priest cause that was or maybe still is cancer in wild, but come on priest is a fun class that can steal your opponents tools at random which comes with a risk if you havent prayed to rngsus
To say Madame Lazul "ruins" surprise OTKs is a strange argument against the card. While you don't know your opponent's hand, you also should recognize an OTK deck based on what your opponent has played. While knowledge of your opponent's hand is absolutely helpful, you're making it sound like it's some kind of toxic card. In a world of Guardian Animals, Illucia, Secret Passage, Solarian Prime, etc. choosing Madame Lazul as your hill to die on is an odd choice.
While I can understand Priest being annoying to play again, mostly because they are heavy on value and control cards, there isn't even a top tier priest deck in the meta right now. It's like complaining about Warlock or something. Leave the poor guys alone.
She can only see 1 Pyroblast not 2, duplicate cards do not show up twice so the Priest will have no idea you are holding 1 or 2 Pyroblasts.
Solid belly laugh
..though sad.
Fun > Meta
What do you mean by 'if it was meant'? Are you saying the card isn't meant to do this or the game isn't meant to have this mechanic? Neither are true, however much you want to hold on to the opinion that you're correct, you simply aren't.
This is a game, designed by people who implement the rules of the game. They designed this card and so you are 'meant' to be able to this action. They specifically designed it to do so.
By your own logic you should be fine with this then because it is intended.
No one is telling you what you should think or say but you must realise that the more stupid or asinine the thing someone says is, the more it will be dismissed and/or ridiculed. You have the right to think stupid things and other people have the right to treat them as such. If you encounter this a lot then the answer isn't to send everyone to China, it's likely that it's you and the way you articulate your point or the process you follow to come to conclusions that are needing to change. This does come across as a pointless whinge thread and exactly the type of post that should go on the salt thread. Why didn't you put it there? Are you needing attention and feel a new thread is more likely to deliver on that front?
Lmao
This must be the longest BS I have read in a while.
Most likely this will be a waste of time due to your limitations but there is always hope.
"This is a game, designed by people who implement the rules of the game. They designed this card and so you are 'meant' to be able to this action."
They designed a well number of cards which they nerf or change all the time, why do they do that you think? If they thought out everything that good then there would be no need for changes at all, but there are, so this comment is BS.
"This does come across as a pointless whinge thread and exactly the type of post that should go on the salt thread."
Salt is for nerf cryings, I claim a mechanic of a card is not well thought, I don't like it my hand is seen, if it's a secret in my hand for example trying to figure out and play against a secret is different then when you simply know what the secret is. Even if the designers intended they intended wrong in my opinion or they intended for the wrong reasons. So again this is something you are assuming but not a fact, meaning it is BS.
"If you encounter this a lot then the answer isn't to send everyone to China, it's likely that it's you and the way you articulate your point or the process you follow to come to conclusions that are needing to change."
There are always and will be people trying to discourage opinions or trying to silence others by throwing out foul words, let's call it trying to oppress opinions. China does the same, a very suitable environment for oppressors.
What we have to do here is to agree that we disagree. This is perfectly normal, but don't go patronizing. The forums are lively because of opinions and discussions.
The card's played winrate is relatively low, that should say something about whether the mechanic is problematic or not.
Its OK when other classes card wording are mentioned as complaint, but as soon as someone mention an actual broken class like in this case, it turns to "PrIeSt HaTe MoVeMeNt" and "sAlT ThReAd" in replies.
If you want to be taken seriously, avoid saying stuff like "I don't like this", "I despise", "it's not nice". Instead, use something more along the lines of "it's not fun to play against", "it's uninteractive", "it's unbalanced" (regardless of that being true or not).
I don’t think OP knows a lot about the game anyway.
Take a walk on the wild side...