Not really, the thing is you dont wanna run 2 Zandalari Templar , because you actually dont wanna draw them consistently on turn 4 , since its extremely unlikely you restored 10 HP by then .
Running the Templar as a one of , worked quite nice in the past, but an 4 mana 8/8 is actually nothing special lategame.
What a roundabout way of saying "don't ever run Zandalari Templar". How about you wait and see what comes out of the deck experimenting next month.
so If big paladin pans out as a meta deck this card will be absurd in that deck Paladin needed a way to either stall or keep a big threat on the board for it to work and here we are it’s not even healbot v2 I’d say this is way better then healbot for the pure fact it is not even a bad body and it can keep your game winning big threats in the game something healbot could not do
Because healbot was one of the most played neutral cards and this is more than a little bit better than it. +2/+3 and the ability to target the battlecry is way more than the standard class card boost.
But Healbot was also played in another eara. Back then aggro was way stronger and healing actually mattered.
Nowadays it seems no deck has issues surviving until they get their quest or whatever completed, and from there on its just a steamroll. Healing for 8 on turn 5 isnt as important as it used to be.
Because healbot was one of the most played neutral cards and this is more than a little bit better than it. +2/+3 and the ability to target the battlecry is way more than the standard class card boost.
But Healbot was also played in another eara. Back then aggro was way stronger and healing actually mattered.
Nowadays it seems no deck has issues surviving until they get their quest or whatever completed, and from there on its just a steamroll. Healing for 8 on turn 5 isnt as important as it used to be.
Couldn't agree more. Don't get me wrong the power of this card is REAL high but it's really just more sustain in a class that already has very high sustain. The good news is it fits well into a midrange dragon deck. The bad news, as of yet, that isn't unfair enough. We'll see what else we get.
It might see play if we enter an aggro heavy meta.
Fits into my Highlander-Quest-Dragon-Healadin
What a roundabout way of saying "don't ever run Zandalari Templar". How about you wait and see what comes out of the deck experimenting next month.
How is this not a priest card?
so If big paladin pans out as a meta deck this card will be absurd in that deck Paladin needed a way to either stall or keep a big threat on the board for it to work and here we are it’s not even healbot v2 I’d say this is way better then healbot for the pure fact it is not even a bad body and it can keep your game winning big threats in the game something healbot could not do
One of the more exciting commons I've seen in a while
* Crystalsmith Kangor intensifies*
I'd vote 'playable' if it wasn't a Dragon. But it's a Dragon. Very good to me!
This space is intentionally blank.
Auchenai Soulpriest
Really strong, remember Antique Healbot...and this is a targettable heal, with premium stats and a dragon.
Antique Healbot is neutral, so yeah, this class card should be better.
Guardian of Kings is from the Basic set, so yeah, this expansion card should be better.
No one is crying in the corner. Those other cards know their place.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
But Healbot was also played in another eara. Back then aggro was way stronger and healing actually mattered.
Nowadays it seems no deck has issues surviving until they get their quest or whatever completed, and from there on its just a steamroll. Healing for 8 on turn 5 isnt as important as it used to be.
Very good card for the stats and effect for 5 mana that's a dragon. Will definitely see play.
Couldn't agree more. Don't get me wrong the power of this card is REAL high but it's really just more sustain in a class that already has very high sustain. The good news is it fits well into a midrange dragon deck. The bad news, as of yet, that isn't unfair enough. We'll see what else we get.
This is a very, very good card. Good stats, dragon tribal, great effect.
This is a great card that I only wish were neutral so that non-healing classes could get some additional sustain (like a buffed Antique Healbot).
Its good enough.
If a control dragon archetype (or a control variant in general) finally works for paladin this is a welcome addition.
This card will see play till next to next year rotation,Dragon deck or not.
Top nerf candidate
Dragon Paladin control is back baby