There were supposed to be only two female Mogu in Warcraft Lore, and both of them were consorts of Lei'Shen. Their names were Suen and Lu'lin. Having nameless female Mogu, and moreover, so numerous that there needs to be a board full of them, completely contradicts the current Lore.
I wonder if Hearthstone devs cared to ask anyone from the WoW team about it...
Does sacrifice mean anything different than destroy? Do sacrificed minions go into a different pool than destroyed minions? I'm probably looking into it too much and sacrifice is just a more flavorful word than destroy.
Ra is most certainly a token card, but why does it have a rarity gem? Token cards are not suppose to have a rarity gem... that's how we tell them apart.
Does sacrifice mean anything different than destroy? Do sacrificed minions go into a different pool than destroyed minions? I'm probably looking into it too much and sacrifice is just a more flavorful word than destroy.
Ra is most certainly a token card, but why does it have a rarity gem? Token cards are not suppose to have a rarity gem... that's how we tell them apart.
While hearthstone sorta has a graveyard mechanic now, its limited to priest. Destroy and Sacrifice mean the same thing with Destroy being either opponents or either player minions, and sacrifice meaning your minions. They are mechanically the same though
Does sacrifice mean anything different than destroy? Do sacrificed minions go into a different pool than destroyed minions? I'm probably looking into it too much and sacrifice is just a more flavorful word than destroy.
Ra is most certainly a token card, but why does it have a rarity gem? Token cards are not suppose to have a rarity gem... that's how we tell them apart.
Does sacrifice mean anything different than destroy? Do sacrificed minions go into a different pool than destroyed minions? I'm probably looking into it too much and sacrifice is just a more flavorful word than destroy.
This is clearly written by a developer who comes from a Magic: the Gathering background.
The word "sacrifice" has never appeared in the text of any Hearthstone card AFAIK. This one should read "destroy."
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
So I think the easiest method for this is to build and elise deck. Combo = Elise, gloop,this card, play elise, play gloop, play gloop again, now you have 8x this card. Then you just play the low cost spells+gadget package to get through your deck.
Don't think it will be t1 or anything but I think it will definitely be playable
It can actually be doable. U need her to survive a turn, then have 2 mogus and a demonbolt in hand. play 6 mogus, demonbolt glinda for 1, play the last mogu.
It can actually be doable. U need her to survive a turn, then have 2 mogus and a demonbolt in hand. play 6 mogus, demonbolt glinda for 1, play the last mogu.
You can guarantee it if you make it to fatigue with Baleful Banker and the quest hero power. Glinda + Banker + hero power would give you a 0 cost glinda.
Why bother play dessert obelisk when this is in the game too?
it's easier to get 3 of those on the board than 7 of these. Unless you're playing Rogue in Standard that is. In Wild it's still easier for rogue to get 3 obelisks than 7 of these thanks to shadowcaster.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
I'm here to kick ass and play cards, and I'm all out of ass.
Probably just a meme, but it should be fun seeing people try to make this card work. Looks better than Blood of The Ancient One at least. The Ancient One always got removed before it could do anything.
Looking forward to building/seeing all of the creative decks built around this card!
Its so hard to make the combo happen and very easy to remove. Faceless manipulator will be the counter. Rogue need to hide it
Hahaha!! This is currently at 28.8% Meta-Defining voting!
Mecha'thun is currently at 28.9% Meta-Defining.
WTF are people doing with their votes!!! JEEZ!!! This must be the "Casual" meta voting LOL!
There were supposed to be only two female Mogu in Warcraft Lore, and both of them were consorts of Lei'Shen. Their names were Suen and Lu'lin. Having nameless female Mogu, and moreover, so numerous that there needs to be a board full of them, completely contradicts the current Lore.
I wonder if Hearthstone devs cared to ask anyone from the WoW team about it...
All these people trying to have fun, right?
Occasionally gives helpful advice.
Play control warrior Day 1, Tech Faceless Manipulator and BAAAAAMMMMMM, the meme dream destroyed.
I don't know if you've noticed, but the voting function isn't terribly accurate.
Half the time, I click to a brand-new poll thread to find that I've somehow already voted.
Even as I look at the page now, it says I voted Meta-defining, and I most certainly did not.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
Twitch: Pacific_Onion
While hearthstone sorta has a graveyard mechanic now, its limited to priest. Destroy and Sacrifice mean the same thing with Destroy being either opponents or either player minions, and sacrifice meaning your minions. They are mechanically the same though
About the gem... Just hearthpwn mistakes....
This is clearly written by a developer who comes from a Magic: the Gathering background.
The word "sacrifice" has never appeared in the text of any Hearthstone card AFAIK. This one should read "destroy."
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
So I think the easiest method for this is to build and elise deck. Combo = Elise, gloop,this card, play elise, play gloop, play gloop again, now you have 8x this card. Then you just play the low cost spells+gadget package to get through your deck.
Don't think it will be t1 or anything but I think it will definitely be playable
It can actually be doable. U need her to survive a turn, then have 2 mogus and a demonbolt in hand. play 6 mogus, demonbolt glinda for 1, play the last mogu.
It's a token, not a card. You can't roll tokens with conjurer's calling.
My question is that if you can get the Corrupt the Waters quest reward and play the 7th one, do you get 2 Ras?
No, confirmed by Peter Whalen on Twitter.
You can guarantee it if you make it to fatigue with Baleful Banker and the quest hero power. Glinda + Banker + hero power would give you a 0 cost glinda.
it's easier to get 3 of those on the board than 7 of these. Unless you're playing Rogue in Standard that is. In Wild it's still easier for rogue to get 3 obelisks than 7 of these thanks to shadowcaster.
I'm here to kick ass and play cards, and I'm all out of ass.
lame
I'm here to kick ass and play cards, and I'm all out of ass.
Probably just a meme, but it should be fun seeing people try to make this card work. Looks better than Blood of The Ancient One at least. The Ancient One always got removed before it could do anything.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 / Gigabyte GTX 1050-Ti / G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x8GB / Crucial MX500 2TB / WD Blue 1TB (2010)
Add me on some other sites; I want friends.
Anilist | RateYourMusic | Steam