I played 5 games in a row with Warlock and Void Contract was the last card in a deck in all 5 of them. Is this a bug or is it programmed like that? Because c'mon, what are the chances for that?
I think the devs and the game never expected anyone to play the card and simply the game didn't know what to do with it, so it put it on the bottom of the deck so you don't play it.
if you run 1 copy 1/(30^5) & if you run 2 copies 1/(15^5)
1/30^5 is much smaller than 1/15^5. Thus, if your second calculation were correct, it would be more likely that you find no Void Contract to the last card when you put in 2 instead of 1. That doesn't make any sense (you already have to find one when you are 29 cards down).
I don't know how to calculate it out of my head (and I am too lazy to look it up on the internet), but the chance that you do not get a void contract must be smaller if you put in two than when you put in only one.
I think the math in the second equation might be right for a single void contract being in the last five cards. If two were in the last five cards, it would be wrong
I played 5 games in a row with Warlock and Void Contract was the last card in a deck in all 5 of them. Is this a bug or is it programmed like that? Because c'mon, what are the chances for that?
Why would Blizzard try to gimp an already meh epic? It's just draw rng, nothing more, nothing less.
I don't have something witty about this deck, I just like it because Malygos is fun.
This was for sure done by Blizzard on purpose. Just like when they broke into my house and hid my tinfoil hat.
Why do people play an RNG heavy game, then complain when the RNG goes against them?
The chances of it happening to you are low, but the likeliness that it will happen to somebody is a certainty.
I think the devs and the game never expected anyone to play the card and simply the game didn't know what to do with it, so it put it on the bottom of the deck so you don't play it.
Hope this helps :)
1/30^5 is much smaller than 1/15^5. Thus, if your second calculation were correct, it would be more likely that you find no Void Contract to the last card when you put in 2 instead of 1. That doesn't make any sense (you already have to find one when you are 29 cards down).
I don't know how to calculate it out of my head (and I am too lazy to look it up on the internet), but the chance that you do not get a void contract must be smaller if you put in two than when you put in only one.
I think the math in the second equation might be right for a single void contract being in the last five cards. If two were in the last five cards, it would be wrong
Has the deck been halfed by the other contract? It is important for the calculations
Blizzard just kindly encourage you to craft second copy of that shit.
In order to emulate this i just made a deck with one void contract.
I drew and drew until the 29th card which was Void Contract. The 30th was Keleseth. Therefore, Keleseth is bugged even more than Void Contract.
Fact. :)
I dusted it the second after I finished that 5th game. Just couldn’t believe what happened and lost all hope for that card.