If that is the case, then it is even bette. If your deck is fill with beast then you dicover a beast and then draw the 3 beast. So it is 4 cards for 3 mana.
The return of the Face hunter. The way I see it if you have a deck full of beast, you dicover one of those beast and them draw all 3. That means it would be 4 cards for 3 mana.
This card works great with the spellstone package with Kathrena. If you discover Kathrena, you can just pick her(three mana to tutor her isn't so bad). If she's not one of the discover options, congrats, you get to draw all three big beast.
It's not YOUR deck though. They try to avoid as much as possible that you can disrupt the opponent's deck like that. We've only started seeing these kinds of effects last year, after D-OP.
All the cards that DISCOVER from your deck are explicitly stating it's a copy, this one isn't.
But heck, it's Hearthstone, they don't care for consistency. Tess works differently than yogg and I can't also for the love of god understand why the 1/3 that freezes on ping from mage didn't work on the reveal video freezing 3 minions either.
I actually think this may end up being the most over-hyped card revealed so far. I even voted it bad (for the time being).
Hunters simply use too many non-beast cards right now and they should, the ones they have access to are insanely good. It's just for this card to be good, you just can't run non-beasts and expect results, which means that you have to try to make this card work in a deck that has both beasts and non-beasts and that turns this card into a high-roll card. Often, it will simply be a 3 mana discover a card and that's just bad. You'd be better off playing Stitched Tracker (which is also not a beast).
Now, once a lot of hunter's powerful non-beast options rotate out of standard, this card's viability may become relevant. Until then though, I really do not think this card will see play.
I actually think this may end up being the most over-hyped card revealed so far. I even voted it bad (for the time being).
Hunters simply use too many non-beast cards right now and they should, the ones they have access to are insanely good. It's just for this card to be good, you just can't run non-beasts and expect results, which means that you have to try to make this card work in a deck that has both beasts and non-beasts and that turns this card into a high-roll card. Often, it will simply be a 3 mana discover a card and that's just bad. You'd be better off playing Stitched Tracker (which is also not a beast).
Now, once a lot of hunter's powerful non-beast options rotate out of standard, this card's viability may become relevant. Until then though, I really do not think this card will see play.
How do you feel about a secrets package of the big beast iteration that was semi popular before the cube hunter days. Stitch tracker was used to dig for Kathrena but if that whiffed, you only get 1 card out of it. If this card whiffs, you don't get the 2/2 body but you get all three big beast out of this card, which imo is MUCH better.
Simply insane. The only card you can't include in your ordinary Midrange Beast Hunter would be Houndmaster. Quite a loss, but certainly worth a 3 mana: draw 3 cards.
Maybe "meta-defining" goes too far, since it's a whole different question if that type of Hunter would be successfull, but the card is on a powerlevel similar to the unnerfed Call of the Wild, just as ridiculous.
Can I make a hunter deck with only beasts? Yep, easy. Will it be worth it? As Rikku says to Tidus, trying to figure out a way to save Yuna from the Final Summoning, That's a toughie.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
GUYS! You're mistaken.
If you just discover one you STILL DRAW/Remove it from the deck.
Check Shadow Visions and Stitched Tracker. They EXPLICITLY mention it's a COPY of the card.
But if all your minions in your deck are beast then it becomes draw 3 beast from your deck.
If that is the case, then it is even bette. If your deck is fill with beast then you dicover a beast and then draw the 3 beast. So it is 4 cards for 3 mana.
The return of the Face hunter. The way I see it if you have a deck full of beast, you dicover one of those beast and them draw all 3. That means it would be 4 cards for 3 mana.
But Houndmaster is so good... As is Houndmaster Shaw. Also risky to run certain tech cards like Mossy Horror and oozes.
Definitely an intriguing card, but one that may require some sacrifices.
This card works great with the spellstone package with Kathrena. If you discover Kathrena, you can just pick her(three mana to tutor her isn't so bad). If she's not one of the discover options, congrats, you get to draw all three big beast.
Drakonid Operative discovers a copy, but does not state this.
It's not YOUR deck though. They try to avoid as much as possible that you can disrupt the opponent's deck like that. We've only started seeing these kinds of effects last year, after D-OP.
All the cards that DISCOVER from your deck are explicitly stating it's a copy, this one isn't.
But heck, it's Hearthstone, they don't care for consistency. Tess works differently than yogg and I can't also for the love of god understand why the 1/3 that freezes on ping from mage didn't work on the reveal video freezing 3 minions either.
Master's Call + Untamed Beastmaster, anyone? :)
Drawing up to three Beasts (discover 1 or 2 remaining in the deck) and give all of them +2/+2 seems niiiiiice.
The worst sacrifice, the 3 manas spot.
Sometimes feels like hunter have 5.833 great cards in 3 manas spot and an imense desert in everything else.
I actually think this may end up being the most over-hyped card revealed so far. I even voted it bad (for the time being).
Hunters simply use too many non-beast cards right now and they should, the ones they have access to are insanely good. It's just for this card to be good, you just can't run non-beasts and expect results, which means that you have to try to make this card work in a deck that has both beasts and non-beasts and that turns this card into a high-roll card. Often, it will simply be a 3 mana discover a card and that's just bad. You'd be better off playing Stitched Tracker (which is also not a beast).
Now, once a lot of hunter's powerful non-beast options rotate out of standard, this card's viability may become relevant. Until then though, I really do not think this card will see play.
Tracking and this in an only beast deck makes you find DK much faster.
I think a beast-only Quest Hunter could work. Say:
yo
Untamed Beastmaster
Think bigger
How do you feel about a secrets package of the big beast iteration that was semi popular before the cube hunter days. Stitch tracker was used to dig for Kathrena but if that whiffed, you only get 1 card out of it. If this card whiffs, you don't get the 2/2 body but you get all three big beast out of this card, which imo is MUCH better.
Quest Hunter support LUL
Simply insane. The only card you can't include in your ordinary Midrange Beast Hunter would be Houndmaster. Quite a loss, but certainly worth a 3 mana: draw 3 cards.
Maybe "meta-defining" goes too far, since it's a whole different question if that type of Hunter would be successfull, but the card is on a powerlevel similar to the unnerfed Call of the Wild, just as ridiculous.
Can I make a hunter deck with only beasts? Yep, easy. Will it be worth it? As Rikku says to Tidus, trying to figure out a way to save Yuna from the Final Summoning, That's a toughie.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
I dont believe this. It must be fake. Blizzard would never give card draw to hunter. Never.