Hearthpwn

Quote from LordMilan >>

What is the problem for anyone to accept neutral legendary can be usable only by 4 classes? It's like that with many legionaries, just not that explicitly defined. There is just no other way how to do multi-class card that neutral. Card looks OK. 

btw in past two years, I don't remember any leaked card what was the fake. All were real. 

 I have no problem with it but imagine a guy having priest and shaman as his main classes because he is F2P and only have collection of these two classes. It would be a nightmare for him. I mean isn't the point of neutral legendaries they are neutral since they can be used by everyone in every class? 

Quote from LordMilan >>

What is the problem for anyone to accept neutral legendary can be usable only by 4 classes? It's like that with many legionaries, just not that explicitly defined. There is just no other way how to do multi-class card that neutral. Card looks OK. 

btw in past two years, I don't remember any leaked card what was the fake. All were real. 

 Wait what lol. I can make any card I want and post it and call it a leaked card.

Quote from Mbayoo >>

Quote from LordMilan >>

What is the problem for anyone to accept neutral legendary can be usable only by 4 classes? It's like that with many legionaries, just not that explicitly defined. There is just no other way how to do multi-class card that neutral. Card looks OK. 

btw in past two years, I don't remember any leaked card what was the fake. All were real. 

 I have no problem with it but imagine a guy having priest and shaman as his main classes because he is F2P and only have collection of these two classes. It would be a nightmare for him. I mean isn't the point of neutral legendaries they are neutral since they can be used by everyone in every class? 

 Well, comparable with e.g. The Darkness what is for F2P player dead card at all. This is at least playable by few classes. F2P player made his decision to go the cheapest way to play, there always be limits. btw I'm already also F2P, just invested at the beginning. 

Quote from TheBeaverKing >>

Why are people saying a 5 mana 4/4 "Draw 5 cards" is bad? Are you guys crazy???

Quote from TheBeaverKing >>

Why are people saying a 5 mana 4/4 "Draw 5 cards" is bad? Are you guys crazy???

 Exactly what I was thinking

Quote from TheSin >>

Look fake as f, the artwork is totally different from any other card of this exp.

 Except that you can look at upcoming reveals and that's one of them..

Quote from TheSin >>

Look fake as f, the artwork is totally different from any other card of this exp.

 https://www.hearthpwn.com/guides/5731-the-boomsday-project-all-card-reveal-countdowns

Looks here. The art is real and we will see the card in 16 hours

Who cares if it's real or not? The art is there, and it's going to be revealed in like 20 hours anyway. Just watch the stream or check this website and you'll find the answer.

I think nobody cares. No one will play bad secrets only to make it work, The art is real, but maybe the text will be different.

A cheaper sprint that also tutors

"This is so fake", "fake as f", "no way it's real",...

Wait.  What?

LUL.

lol very beautiful... secret galore... :D

https://www.hearthpwn.com/news/5729-new-card-reveal-subject-9

Well, looks like its not fake as f 
But still bad

LUL

Can see this being played in a hybrid secret Hunter with secretkeepers (and maybe some mechs?).  This deck saw some minor succes earlier (Spellstone and Eaglehorn Bow are great cards after all). Hunter appreciates any kind of draw it can find.

Mage has Arcanologist, Aluneth and enough card draw so I doubt it will find a way there.

I dont think Paladin will go back to it's secret days but who knows that someone will come up with a Subject 9 - Bellringer Sentry Secret deck (that new secret's not too shabby) that ends up destroying the meta.

Rogue? Meh.

Hunter and Pally are the most likely candidates for this in standard, but for now it down't look like a great legendary to craft. Definitely save your dust until we see this confirmed in the meta.

I'm more curious how this does in wild. 5 mana for a 4/4 body and targeted deck thinning isn't a bad value for hunter and pally, since they can easily get three to a full 5 secrets up in a turn (turn 6 for pally, turn 10+ for hunter to Christmas tree, which isn't usually great in hunter anyways).

I won't mind pulling it from a pack, but I'm definitely not crafting until I see this in action. Let the pros and big spenders/collectors play with this.

Why does everyone think this is bad? Seems like an auto-include in secret mage. Arcanologist gives you one secret for a base stat minion. This gives you 1-2 more secrets at a cost of 1.5 mana worth of stats. Seems like a good deal to me.

Quote from jd777 >>

Quote from Kwakdizzle >>

And to think that Mysterious Challenger only cost one more mana and in exchange, had a well statted body, was an epic, and didn't just draw 5, but PLAYED whatever was in your deck. Of course, that was restricted to paladin,  but this seems so weak as a legendary 

 it was also printed in hearthstone early expansions where power levels of crads were way higher then they are today

 He was also printed as a Paladin exclusive, Paladin having the weakest secrets of the 3 primary secret classes. Could you imagine Mysterious Challenger in Hunter? It would be insane. Mad Scientist very nearly broke the game in that class when it came out. Hunter secrets are VERY good.

Seems pretty nice for Hunters, at least in Wild. Follow up with Professor Putricide + Cloaked Huntress and enjoy your Christmas Tree. Too bad it's going to be inconsistent though.

Quote from Garlicnerd >>

Quote from jd777 >>

Quote from Kwakdizzle >>

And to think that Mysterious Challenger only cost one more mana and in exchange, had a well statted body, was an epic, and didn't just draw 5, but PLAYED whatever was in your deck. Of course, that was restricted to paladin,  but this seems so weak as a legendary 

 it was also printed in hearthstone early expansions where power levels of crads were way higher then they are today

 He was also printed as a Paladin exclusive, Paladin having the weakest secrets of the 3 primary secret classes. Could you imagine Mysterious Challenger in Hunter? It would be insane. Mad Scientist very nearly broke the game in that class when it came out. Hunter secrets are VERY good.

 This card might be the best card draw ever printed for Hunter