And to think that Mysterious Challenger only cost one more mana and in exchange, had a well statted body, was an epic, and didn't just draw 5, but PLAYED whatever was in your deck. Of course, that was restricted to paladin, but this seems so weak as a legendary
And to think that Mysterious Challenger only cost one more mana and in exchange, had a well statted body, was an epic, and didn't just draw 5, but PLAYED whatever was in your deck. Of course, that was restricted to paladin, but this seems so weak as a legendary
It won't justify to play one mana secrets from paladin but, why not in Hunter or Mage. Rogue has only 3 different secrets so it's not really useful too.
I think Hunter is definitively the best option for this card.
It won't justify to play one mana secrets from paladin but, why not in Hunter or Mage. Rogue has only 3 different secrets so it's not really useful too.
I think Hunter is definitively the best option for this card.
Tag beast confirms your thoughts.
But if you play Hybrid or Spell hunter, you need to play Subject9 asap. You will never draw 5. Also think about the spellstone, you always want to upgrade and play it early.
I am totally disappointed with the neutral legendaries...
It won't justify to play one mana secrets from paladin but, why not in Hunter or Mage. Rogue has only 3 different secrets so it's not really useful too.
I think Hunter is definitively the best option for this card.
Tag beast confirms your thoughts.
But if you play Hybrid or Spell hunter, you need to play Subject9 asap. You will never draw 5. Also think about the spellstone, you always want to upgrade and play it early.
I am totally disappointed with the neutral legendaries...
http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/cards/subject-9/ its real.
http://www.hearthstonetopdecks.com/cards/subject-9/ real dude
You play Cloaked Huntress.
Release the Kraken!
And to think that Mysterious Challenger only cost one more mana and in exchange, had a well statted body, was an epic, and didn't just draw 5, but PLAYED whatever was in your deck. Of course, that was restricted to paladin, but this seems so weak as a legendary
It's a cheaper Sprint... that tutors.
It has to be snakes.
This card has no sense for 6 out of 9 classes. Bad design, my cat can be more creative.
Secretkeeper
It has to be snakes.
I see no place for it in standard(yet) but in wild it is a very different story. Both secret mage and secret hunter will love 4\4 body that draws 5
It's easy to forget Rogue has secrets too
5 mana 4-4 which draws 5 cards? Seems good to me.
"whenever a secret is played", not "whenever you play a secret"
It won't justify to play one mana secrets from paladin but, why not in Hunter or Mage. Rogue has only 3 different secrets so it's not really useful too.
I think Hunter is definitively the best option for this card.
Love the tribes.
Tag beast confirms your thoughts.
But if you play Hybrid or Spell hunter, you need to play Subject9 asap. You will never draw 5. Also think about the spellstone, you always want to upgrade and play it early.
I am totally disappointed with the neutral legendaries...
Didnt shudderwock get accidentally leaked? Guess this is his cursed cousin
Why u hav to be mad? is only card gaem.
Hope its not real. Wouldn’t want to pack this dude at all. He seems really bad, pack filler legendary.
At least we can find it on zombeast Hero Power !
Love the tribes.
Same here , even in Hunter you dont wanna play shitty secrets just to make this guy work.
The artwork is different from the card reveal box, the head I mean, so BUSTED
Don't mind me just passing by
I also hope it isn't real. For 4 classes, it can't be used at all. It is a solid minion for Hunter but it would be a big waste of a legendary spot.
Now that’s a legendary I want in secret Paladin just play like 5 secrets for 5 mana Jesus Christmas lord that’s insaneeee