I noticed an insane ratio of 'Meta-Defining' votes for the Lady in White.
I want to clarify to anyone who voted this that the card is only a slightly better Mistcaller, which you need to build a deck around. It has anti-synergy with many of Priest's newest powerful cards. It is also USELESS for Combo Priest, which relies on Divine Spiriting an individual minion before using Inner Fire for lethal damage.
In the end, once all the cards are released, maybe this card will be meta defining in some kind of new priest deck. But atm, with what we have now, it really sucks.
I know that this is a hard concept to grasp but meta defining should stand for ''a card that will have a deck revolved around it in the upcoming metagame'' which is what this card will have, at least at the beginning.
you need to be a little bit clever and u should know that a new card doesnt need to be included in an old deck.
just use ur mind please and think of this card in a new priest archetype, tempo priest.
this card is of those cards that u build a deck around it, you can included it in a dragon tempo priest with ysera and primordial drake and duskbreaker whose effect is enough without the need of the buff on him
I noticed an insane ratio of 'Meta-Defining' votes for the Lady in White.
I want to clarify to anyone who voted this that the card is only a slightly better Mistcaller, which you need to build a deck around. It has anti-synergy with many of Priest's newest powerful cards. It is also USELESS for Combo Priest, which relies on Divine Spiriting an individual minion before using Inner Fire for lethal damage.
In the end, once all the cards are released, maybe this card will be meta defining in some kind of new priest deck. But atm, with what we have now, it really sucks.
How is The Mistcaller a card you have to build a deck around?????? Aside from including minions...
I noticed an insane ratio of 'Meta-Defining' votes for the Lady in White.
I want to clarify to anyone who voted this that the card is only a slightly better Mistcaller, which you need to build a deck around. It has anti-synergy with many of Priest's newest powerful cards. It is also USELESS for Combo Priest, which relies on Divine Spiriting an individual minion before using Inner Fire for lethal damage.
In the end, once all the cards are released, maybe this card will be meta defining in some kind of new priest deck. But atm, with what we have now, it really sucks.
Lol you can easily divine spirit already Lady-buffed minion and increase its attack one more time with inner fire.
The only bad thing for combo priest is that Lady disrupts twillight drake. But anyway I think Lady is not for Combo priest, it will push new priest archetypes for sure
I noticed an insane ratio of 'Meta-Defining' votes for the Lady in White.
I want to clarify to anyone who voted this that the card is only a slightly better Mistcaller, which you need to build a deck around. It has anti-synergy with many of Priest's newest powerful cards. It is also USELESS for Combo Priest, which relies on Divine Spiriting an individual minion before using Inner Fire for lethal damage.
In the end, once all the cards are released, maybe this card will be meta defining in some kind of new priest deck. But atm, with what we have now, it really sucks.
How is The Mistcaller a card you have to build a deck around?????? Aside from including minions...
He's saying you have to build around Lady in White.
I know that this is a hard concept to grasp but meta defining should stand for ''a card that will have a deck revolved around it in the upcoming metagame'' which is what this card will have, at least at the beginning.
In that same logic Emeriss will be meta-defining, I'm sure there will be no shortage of testing her usefulness in new Hunter decks. A card which defines the meta is one that warrants playing around and teching against (thus affecting the meta and the decks/cards played in it). As it stands, nobody will have to worry about playing around Lady in White.
you need to be a little bit clever and u should know that a new card doesnt need to be included in an old deck.
just use ur mind please and think of this card in a new priest archetype, tempo priest.
I'm not sure you read my post properly (please "use your mind" next time lmao)
Whether this card is included in an old or new deck, it will not be very strong considering the cards we have available. And in tempo priest? You must be having a laugh, either you run this in a regular tempo deck and the minions you're playing will be mostly unaffected by the buff, OR you play this in a modified tempo deck with in-aggressive, high health minions. In this case you're not even playing a tempo deck until you activate Lady in White, which could be any point from turn 5 onwards (that's not very good for a tempo deck, starting to get aggressive after turn 6).
I appreciate this post because I agree with you, but your opinion is not special enough to warrant its own thread. Just post in the card reveal thread.
Do keep in mind that control shaman was never truly a competitive deck. I think priest could get away with something like mistcaller, or better yet, lady in white, since many priest minions have more health than attack by more than a single point.
I don't see how you can build an entire deck around having shitty weirdly stated minions that happen to get slightly better when you draw the Mistcaller. I'd argue that this card is actually WORSE than the Mistcaller because it doesn't work for all minions and it doesn't even buff the ones in your hand.
With a rotation new decks are sure to be created. Applying Inner Fire to your deck is insane! A deck built around this card should be easy to do.
Yes you can easily build around this card, and yes when you do apply the buff on turn 5/6 is great. But that's not a guarantee the deck itself will be any good, especially when you don't find Lady in White soon enough.
The card isn't even out yet. Keleseth can be played on turn 1 and even shadowstepped to double/triple up on the effect.
Lady in White will win you far less games that Kelesth ever did in Tier 1 Tempo Rogue. (4 mana 7/7s on turn 7 are cute, but not quite a 4/4 Patches on turn 2)
I noticed an insane ratio of 'Meta-Defining' votes for the Lady in White.
I want to clarify to anyone who voted this that the card is only a slightly better Mistcaller, which you need to build a deck around. It has anti-synergy with many of Priest's newest powerful cards. It is also USELESS for Combo Priest, which relies on Divine Spiriting an individual minion before using Inner Fire for lethal damage.
In the end, once all the cards are released, maybe this card will be meta defining in some kind of new priest deck. But atm, with what we have now, it really sucks.
I know that this is a hard concept to grasp but meta defining should stand for ''a card that will have a deck revolved around it in the upcoming metagame'' which is what this card will have, at least at the beginning.
you need to be a little bit clever and u should know that a new card doesnt need to be included in an old deck.
just use ur mind please and think of this card in a new priest archetype, tempo priest.
this card is of those cards that u build a deck around it, you can included it in a dragon tempo priest with ysera and primordial drake and duskbreaker whose effect is enough without the need of the buff on him
With a rotation new decks are sure to be created. Applying Inner Fire to your deck is insane! A deck built around this card should be easy to do.
If you are in your first year of playing please read this post.
Dust does not burn a hole in the jar. Be careful what you craft, especially before and right after a rotation.
People saying its like mistcaller are prolly onto something
This deck could keep dragon priest alive. I voted very good, but meta defining is far from a stretch.
Congratulations on quickly making it from Denial to Anger and into Bargaining...
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
I appreciate this post because I agree with you, but your opinion is not special enough to warrant its own thread. Just post in the card reveal thread.
I think this will be good, priest naturally likes minions w/ higher health. Any deck w/ a lot of high health will want this.
I think the card is very strong, but I just couldn't find a home for it, I agree, I rated it playable
Don't mind me just passing by
Do keep in mind that control shaman was never truly a competitive deck. I think priest could get away with something like mistcaller, or better yet, lady in white, since many priest minions have more health than attack by more than a single point.
I don't see how you can build an entire deck around having shitty weirdly stated minions that happen to get slightly better when you draw the Mistcaller. I'd argue that this card is actually WORSE than the Mistcaller because it doesn't work for all minions and it doesn't even buff the ones in your hand.
Why are people even talking about MIstcaller? +1/+1 is the same as buffing attack to match health? Okay, whatever floats your boat.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.