I am really considering now switching to mainly Priest and opening a lot of packs at the beginning of the expansion just to get this legendary.
But I will wait and see what kind of tools the other classes get in order to fight this. Can't wait for more cards to get revealed. Omg, so hyped! :D
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
What's the point in it saying Cast 'Inner Fire' if the card specifies exactly what that does anyway?
Just have it say, "Change the Attack of all minions in your deck to be equal to their Health."
So you can silence it
didn't consider that, but can't you do that anyways since it's a buff in any case?
i think it will be similar to quest rogue, ( ur minions are 5/5 ) is it similar to " change " ?
Since it specifically says "cast Inner fire", I would imagine all affected minions would be susceptible to silence.
If that is true, I guess we will have another Cubelock situation on our hands, where people tech against mirror matches of their own class. Priest is also the class with a lot of Silence cards.
The amount of "meta-defining" here is astonishing. So let's think up a Standard deck (I assume most players here vote based on the Standard meta) that is good with Lady in White. I'll start by listing the good cards that are also good with Lady in White (no Lightwell, Mogu'shan Warden, Ultrasaur, Lorewalker Cho, or other bad cards/memes):
The reason I don't include cards like Stormwind Knight is because he's ONLY good after you play Lady in White. This makes your deck bad and inconsistent.
After I narrow it down, I don't understand at all how you can form a deck where it is worth it to play Lady in White. I just don't think you can justify running enough minions that she likes buffing to make a good deck.
It's a fun and well-designed card, but I argue that it's bad. Very comparable to Mistcaller.
Why -wouldn't- you include the 'bad' cards? You seem to be thinking 'what cards does this support' instead of 'what supports this card'.
Looking through this thread, everyone keeps saying/thinking "Mistcaller" when instead they should be thinking "quest rogue", except instead of the juggling condition, the condition is "draw this card and survive by turn 7" (which wouldn't be hard given the type of cards you would include in this deck), after which the priest will be able to have a situation the opponent can't play around.
Exactly right. Thank you. People who think this isn't going to make a huge dent in the meta are kidding themselves. The fact you could stick this in any already viable priest decks with no down side other than running a single copy of another card to make room will make this an insta-include. The Mistcaller wasn't even close, Prince Keleseth, while strong enough to make tier 1, also required a whole decklist modified to suit his inclusion. If Lady in White is left untouched, Priest will be hard to beat in the year of the raven.
This is ridicolous. Priest getting the most BUSTED cards once again, while Warrior and Hunters are getting trolled to the ground. Yea Blizz seems quite satisfied with the current Meta class distribution. SHAME ON YOU !!
So deck not deck .. Stormwind Knight if the lady in black that leaked in the comments is real 4 mana 10/10 with charge is coming xD
There is no lady in black :D
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
The only connection that this card has with combo priest, is the term "inner fire".Good inclusion in e tempo deck but you get late game value of this, and you cant really build a deck around it,just to have a 12/12 isera, a 8/8 idol etc.witch you'll still have to pay mana for..pls guys stop OVERREACTING over this.
The amount of "meta-defining" here is astonishing. So let's think up a Standard deck (I assume most players here vote based on the Standard meta) that is good with Lady in White. I'll start by listing the good cards that are also good with Lady in White (no Lightwell, Mogu'shan Warden, Ultrasaur, Lorewalker Cho, or other bad cards/memes):
The reason I don't include cards like Stormwind Knight is because he's ONLY good after you play Lady in White. This makes your deck bad and inconsistent.
After I narrow it down, I don't understand at all how you can form a deck where it is worth it to play Lady in White. I just don't think you can justify running enough minions that she likes buffing to make a good deck.
It's a fun and well-designed card, but I argue that it's bad. Very comparable to Mistcaller.
Why -wouldn't- you include the 'bad' cards? You seem to be thinking 'what cards does this support' instead of 'what supports this card'.
Looking through this thread, everyone keeps saying/thinking "Mistcaller" when instead they should be thinking "quest rogue", except instead of the juggling condition, the condition is "draw this card and survive by turn 7" (which wouldn't be hard given the type of cards you would include in this deck), after which the priest will be able to have a situation the opponent can't play around.
Exactly right. Thank you. People who think this isn't going to make a huge dent in the meta are kidding themselves. The fact you could stick this in any already viable priest decks with no down side other than running a single copy of another card to make room will make this an insta-include. The Mistcaller wasn't even close, Prince Keleseth, while strong enough to make tier 1, also required a whole decklist modified to suit his inclusion. If Lady in White is left untouched, Priest will be hard to beat in the year of the raven.
Yup my thoughts exactly. The key here is that it is a non-conditional card, and Priest is a very different class from Shaman. You don't have to craft a deck around this, just reserve one slot and you're good. Many Priest class cards benefit from this.
I mean sure it's an alright card, but meta defining??
You guys seriously want to make a lady in white deck that runs snapjaws, shieldraiser, sleeping dragons and so ok, which all suck hard when you dont draw this? So basically a 100% draw dependent deck?
Realisticly this buffs drake, statue and northshire, which is far from OP. Obviously this will stay for 3 years and is definitely a card to look out for and which will see play.
I am really considering now switching to mainly Priest and opening a lot of packs at the beginning of the expansion just to get this legendary.
I don’t think switching to Priest will influence your packs opening, but who knows ^^
What I ment was - starting to play mainly Priest in the new expansion, since I am a warlock player and until this last reveal I thought of keeping it that way. I play most of the classes when I want to try something fun or new, but I stick to mostly warlock decks since I came back to hearthstone at the end of December.
But with this card, I may switch to priest and craft it, if I don't get it from the packs I am going to open in the beginning of the expansion. It looks really OP and auto-include in probably every priest deck.
And I do think it's better than Prince Keleseth, because it does not have any restrictions whatsoever. It's just a pure attack buff on every minion in your deck, except Twilight Drake.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
If you can build a deck that is like low t2 when you DON'T draw this and then become high t1 when you do then this is a Keleseth-level card.
I am really considering now switching to mainly Priest and opening a lot of packs at the beginning of the expansion just to get this legendary.
But I will wait and see what kind of tools the other classes get in order to fight this. Can't wait for more cards to get revealed. Omg, so hyped! :D
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
Cant wait for my 12/12 Ysera to seal the game :)
Meat wagon devilsaur egg doomsayers
The 7 mana 4/8 with windfury... Thats just scary as fuck
This is ridicolous. Priest getting the most BUSTED cards once again, while Warrior and Hunters are getting trolled to the ground. Yea Blizz seems quite satisfied with the current Meta class distribution. SHAME ON YOU !!
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
The only connection that this card has with combo priest, is the term "inner fire".Good inclusion in e tempo deck but you get late game value of this, and you cant really build a deck around it,just to have a 12/12 isera, a 8/8 idol etc.witch you'll still have to pay mana for..pls guys stop OVERREACTING over this.
Of course it can.
Iksar was saying in a recent interview how the team doesn't like swingy cards or games that are decided by shuffle order.
I guess someone somewhere didn't get a memo.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland
How people dare to compare this insanely good card with Mistcaller?
Bonus de +1/+1 in turn 6 in deck is not that relevant but +8 attack is insane, Ysera is just one example...
Why are people rating this so good?
I mean sure it's an alright card, but meta defining??
You guys seriously want to make a lady in white deck that runs snapjaws, shieldraiser, sleeping dragons and so ok, which all suck hard when you dont draw this? So basically a 100% draw dependent deck?
Realisticly this buffs drake, statue and northshire, which is far from OP. Obviously this will stay for 3 years and is definitely a card to look out for and which will see play.
But honestly, interesting, FAIR and cool design.
Occasionally gives helpful advice.
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);