Could have been a decent Arena card, except that 1) it's a rare, and 2) Warrior is no longer a class in Arena.
It might not be rare. Warrior has already gotten 3 rares and this would make it 4, so that means either this card or one of the other rares isn't actually a rare.
If it didn't work that way, it would be an over statted 3 drop that can attack normally with an upside of getting an extra random attack. It doesn't seem likely/balanced.
I'm assuming this is similar to Windfury? where you can attack after the auto trigger effect?
I am pretty sure it just attacks and you can't control what it attacks. So its a worse what ever the GvG 4/4 is called.
How did you come up with this?
If it didn't work that way, it would be an over statted 3 drop that can attack normally, with an upside of getting an extra random attack. It doesn't seem likely/balanced.
My question: is there something we are overlooking that makes this not worse than Ogre Brute in every way? Because this is pretty offensive to me otherwise.
My question: is there something we are overlooking that makes this not worse than Ogre Brute in every way? Because this is pretty offensive to me otherwise.
It's in standard, so I guess that's one thing it has going for it.
Oger brute is generlaly better and that wasn't a great card. Haynir frost rider is MUCH better and that sees no play.
I don't think blizzard realises that 3 mana 4/4 and 3/5 is almost under stated in constructed. In wild, dragon priests no longer play the 3 mana 3/5 since cards like cabal talon priests are often times 3 mana 3/7
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Carpe Diem - Seize the day
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Discuss!
Learn More About Kobolds and Catacombs
Looking to learn more about Hearthstone's seventh expansion? Visit our expansion guide for Kobolds and Catacombs!!
I'm assuming this is similar to Windfury? where you can attack after the auto trigger effect?
Decent.
Arena card. Won't see play in constructed.
4/4 on 3 always has a drawback, this the auto-attack consumes the attack
so it's Swamp King Dred cosplaying as Ogre Brute?
Edit: nvm, i guess it's jsut a worse OGre Brute
I tried having fun once. It was awful.
lol the art is funny.
good in arena, not amazing in constructive.
Still a good card you only need to clear the board before use it.
Isn't this warrior's 4th rare?
Straight worse Ogre Brute as a class card...even without thinking, most braindead card in the game dont like the design of this.
Basically Ogre Brute reprint.
A class card worse than a neutral old card?
I don't get it, they made powerful cards for classes already strong and opressive and meme cards for classes barely see play.
WHY???
Could have been a decent Arena card, except that 1) it's a rare, and 2) Warrior is no longer a class in Arena.
On the third day before Witchwood, Blizzard gave to me,
three Handlock decks,
two Molten Giants
and a winstreak to Legend Rank #3
Disclaimer: This is a fictional poem and this didn't actually happen to me.
If it didn't work that way, it would be an over statted 3 drop that can attack normally with an upside of getting an extra random attack. It doesn't seem likely/balanced.
My question: is there something we are overlooking that makes this not worse than Ogre Brute in every way? Because this is pretty offensive to me otherwise.
Oger brute is generlaly better and that wasn't a great card. Haynir frost rider is MUCH better and that sees no play.
I don't think blizzard realises that 3 mana 4/4 and 3/5 is almost under stated in constructed. In wild, dragon priests no longer play the 3 mana 3/5 since cards like cabal talon priests are often times 3 mana 3/7
Carpe Diem - Seize the day