STOP DESTROYING HUNTER!!!!! HUNTER NEVER BE A CONTROL !!! CHANGE HERO POWER WITH PRIST OR WARRIOR!!!!!!!!! I JUST WANNA SEE ALL THIS PPL WHO GIVE VOTE PLAYABLE OR BETTER PLAYING CONTROL HUNTER EASY LEGEND ECH MONTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The thing in Hunter is atm. all early game besides maybe cracling razormaw kinda suck. This is pretty interesting with Charged Devilsaur and King Crush BUT its like 8 mana. However if your only beasts are Charged Devilsaur and Crush this is 8 mana Battlecry and Deathrattle summon a 7/7 charge.
Can be pretty interesting but im sceptic about control hunter still.
this card is good, there is a lot of deathrattle triggers now for hunter. and you can built some wierd hybrid with elementals and Devilsaur Egg's and Stitched Tracker to make it kinda work. (non beasts midrange creatures and huge beasts like highmane's and 2 legendary dinosaurs, etc)
maybe not Very good, but i kinda like to try this kind of stuff
Love the card, potentially very strong in the right situation....... But it doesn’t do anything vs aggro and it doesn’t help you survive late game vs Raza priest so I think this fits into the meme with/dust category.
I can see building a Secret hunter deck around this. Who needs little beasts when you can fill your deck with everything else. All the princes etc.
Hunter can definitely live to later turns without small beasts. Hunter has plenty of tools and spells. Secrets and Eaglehorn Bow just for starters. That must be why she has a bow. Everyone in hunter is going to have a bow.
On paper, the card is very strong,lots of value, thins your deck, and has immediate impact, It's just a really good late game card that can very easily fit into a mid-range hunter, The only problem is the class itself, when hunter loses the board they can't get it back, and by the time you get to play this, you might be dead on board already, We'll see.....
you COULD build a different hunter deck that only runs big beasts.. you know..
And I don't think this card will make it possible. How are you going to survive until the late game without early beasts? Hoping for your doomsayers and mistresses in the opening hand and then what? No card draw, no AoE, no heal, hound master taunts needs a small beast etc. We'll have to wait what the rest of the set brings, and I always hope I'm wrong with such statements, but yeah feels like a let down once again. We'll possible get another good 2 or 3 drop that will make mid-range hunter great again. That dragon however that Priest got, ugh.
you could try something like this more or less you don't have to be locked into something you can use the core early game of other decks, btw recruit works with keleseth :P
maybe a few less cards that are bad with barnes and some more deathrattle cards but generally I think such deck is very fun.
I know I am gonna try such a deck day one, and tweak it seeing how stuff go.
This is real, real bad.
Control hunter won't be a thing, because the core of hunter is playing stuff on core and going face.
Fuck cubelock
STOP DESTROYING HUNTER!!!!! HUNTER NEVER BE A CONTROL !!! CHANGE HERO POWER WITH PRIST OR WARRIOR!!!!!!!!! I JUST WANNA SEE ALL THIS PPL WHO GIVE VOTE PLAYABLE OR BETTER PLAYING CONTROL HUNTER EASY LEGEND ECH MONTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The thing in Hunter is atm. all early game besides maybe cracling razormaw kinda suck. This is pretty interesting with Charged Devilsaur and King Crush BUT its like 8 mana. However if your only beasts are Charged Devilsaur and Crush this is 8 mana Battlecry and Deathrattle summon a 7/7 charge.
Can be pretty interesting but im sceptic about control hunter still.
8 mana 6/6 summon Alleycat.
this is sick for a secret hunter - just don't run any beasts but the big formerly unplayable ones. I want my swamp king dust back!
I shall make the best deathrattle hunter deck out there!
wild reno control secret nzoth hunter
this card is good, there is a lot of deathrattle triggers now for hunter. and you can built some wierd hybrid with elementals and Devilsaur Egg's and Stitched Tracker to make it kinda work. (non beasts midrange creatures and huge beasts like highmane's and 2 legendary dinosaurs, etc)
maybe not Very good, but i kinda like to try this kind of stuff
One day hunters will get a decent legendary, but today is not this day.
If i get her in an booster my King crush will finally see some play.
Secret N'Zoth hunter in wild with only big beasts? I think its playable but not a great legendary.
Love the card, potentially very strong in the right situation....... But it doesn’t do anything vs aggro and it doesn’t help you survive late game vs Raza priest so I think this fits into the meme with/dust category.
Rated control hunter/10.
If control hunter is ever a thing, this is pretty great.
But when has control hunter ever been a thing.
Barnes Hunter is pretty close to a thing though....so I'd not laugh at this card too quickly.
I can see building a Secret hunter deck around this. Who needs little beasts when you can fill your deck with everything else. All the princes etc.
Hunter can definitely live to later turns without small beasts. Hunter has plenty of tools and spells. Secrets and Eaglehorn Bow just for starters. That must be why she has a bow. Everyone in hunter is going to have a bow.
On paper, the card is very strong,lots of value, thins your deck, and has immediate impact, It's just a really good late game card that can very easily fit into a mid-range hunter, The only problem is the class itself, when hunter loses the board they can't get it back, and by the time you get to play this, you might be dead on board already, We'll see.....
I really like the INTENTION of this card. Hunter needs another hero power tho.
A strong card that does not match the class strengths.
Kinda hit or miss, either meta-defining or randome trash.