Hearthpwn

People who think this is bad because of the drawback don't remember Fel Reaver. There is basically zero drawback on this card. The reason it's probably not good is that an aggro deck doesn't really want a 4 mana 5/5 vanilla, which is what this is.

Quote from Sadiii_ >>

Maybe if this were a 2 mana 5/5 with the same effect, it might see play. Hell, who am I kidding, even then it'd be Dust. 

Quote from Aestriel >>

This argument always fails since not every card is equal in terms of power. Removing the card you need for the situation your in makes you lose.

Quote from ScythePerson >>

I mean, I get where they are coming from but 5/5 for 4 isn't enough a bounus for it to be worth the affect. maybe if it was a 7/7 or 8/8 is would be more like Fel Reaver

Quote from ManiaCCC >>

Quote from ScythePerson >>

I mean, I get where they are coming from but 5/5 for 4 isn't enough a bounus for it to be worth the affect. maybe if it was a 7/7 or 8/8 is would be more like Fel Reaver

 Do you people even think?  Fel Reaver had to be so overstated, because your opponent could use drawbacks against you. With this card, you are in control. 

This card is not insane by any means, but it is really good in certain decks. Stats are fine.

Quote from greindes >>

Quote from ManiaCCC >>

Quote from ScythePerson >>

I mean, I get where they are coming from but 5/5 for 4 isn't enough a bounus for it to be worth the affect. maybe if it was a 7/7 or 8/8 is would be more like Fel Reaver

 Do you people even think?  Fel Reaver had to be so overstated, because your opponent could use drawbacks against you. With this card, you are in control. 

This card is not insane by any means, but it is really good in certain decks. Stats are fine.

 This effect is not worth +1 attack, it should be at least 5/6 or even 5/7 to be just good in arena and terrible in constructed.

This could actually be a decent card in aggro decks. You play it on turn 4 and it gets insta removed or you are very close to winning the game. And in a deck like pirate warrior, you don't really care about milling your deck. Could see some play in a budget aggro deck. It's better than the poll make it look like.

Quote from BuckyCZ >>

This could actually be a decent card in aggro decks. You play it on turn 4 and it gets insta removed or you are very close to winning the game. And in a deck like pirate warrior, you don't really care about milling your deck. Could see some play in a budget aggro deck. It's better than the poll make it look like.

Hungry Dragon is 5/6 for 4 mana and its drawback of giving the opponent a 1-cost minion is minimal compared to this.

Quote from BigFatMurloc >>

Lol @ hearthstone plebs thinking this is a bad effect, this will be in all aggro decks as 2 off staple. Its basically a 4 mana 5/5 without drawback.

Insanely strong card.

I got this in a ridiculous arena draft with two jade idols and a gadgetzan auctioneer, and immediately decided I would attempt to mill my deck in order to get infinite jade idols with auctioneer draw whenever I played one. I managed to hit the combo 3 times in 8 games, and milled my deck for infinite jade value, it was pretty cool. I don't know if I'd call it good (deck went 5-3 but that was more due to the lich king, two ultimate infestations, and a lot of good druid spells also being in the deck), but it was hilarious, certainly my most memorable recent arena run.