Hearthpwn

Card seems pretty bad to me especially when you compare it to Arcanologist, now yes it is nice to draw Tirion to your hand but it is at the cost of losing tempo on board with this card. Card seems to be bad at best IMO.

This just shows how stupid arcanologist really is.If that card didnt exist the reactions to this cards would be way more positive.

Arena...lower than average where it will just be a 3 mana 2/2, unless you have a strong (or even any) divine shield minion already drafted in your deck. If you only have Tirion in your deck with no other divine shield minions. Great card to pick.

Constructed. Maybe decent as long as you have solid divine shield minions. This bringing out an Argent Squire not so good...

With a card like Arcanologist around why would this have to be so poorly stated? It could easily be 3 mana 2/3 atleast.

Too many people comparing this to Arcanologist. Secrets are overall weak cards so their tech cards need to be comparatively powerful. It says something when secrets decks still aren't a thing despite how many great secret tech cards there are.

Quote from Dai >>

Too many people comparing this to Arcanologist. Secrets are overall weak cards so their tech cards need to be comparatively powerful. It says something when secrets decks still aren't a thing despite how many great secret tech cards there are.

No room. And you don't need a bad low impact card for value. You already have mega value from Stonehill and Hydrologist. (Not to mention your Pali Legendaries are value too (which Stonehill can self generate)).

Not to mention Stonehill is creating a free card -- meaning, it's an additional card your opponent has to deal with. While drawing the card you need is great, making more threats is MUCH, MUCH better.

This card is just far too low impact to include with so many other better options.

Meh, since it just draws the card and does not let you discover it.

Quote from Brads_Gaming >>

Quote from Dai >>

Too many people comparing this to Arcanologist. Secrets are overall weak cards so their tech cards need to be comparatively powerful. It says something when secrets decks still aren't a thing despite how many great secret tech cards there are.

 Last time I checked I wouldn't exactly say secret mage was weak. I think Arcanologist is so insanely better in numerous way. One of the main reasons is the card you draw can be played the next turn if needed. If this card had divine shield itself I think it would be a decent card then.

With 3 mana and 2 hp this card makes no sense in a world, where Arcanologist exists.

Quote from Dai >>

Too many people comparing this to Arcanologist. Secrets are overall weak cards so their tech cards need to be comparatively powerful. It says something when secrets decks still aren't a thing despite how many great secret tech cards there are.

Voted bad.

Paladin has better three-drops, and the value isn't great.

Pretty funny. With this card, Blizzard clearly shows they understand the power of draw on a card, even if it draws a specific type of card. So why did they apply proper balancing to this card, but not to Arcanologist?