What do you think? Is Snipe a valid counter to the Quest Rogue? Yes, it just kills one of their minions, but they usually bank on bouncing that one multiple times.
U dont need any counter if u play Hunter.. just all in bang bang
Yeah - generally this. Unless Hunter opens badly and Rogue opens really well, the Hunter player should often have the upper hand. That said, Snipe does totally work. It's screwed me up a few times in the match up. The question is, "Is the secret hunter deck better than the best-focused Midrange Hunter?"
U dont need any counter if u play Hunter.. just all in bang bang
Yeah - generally this. Unless Hunter opens badly and Rogue opens really well, the Hunter player should often have the upper hand. That said, Snipe does totally work. It's screwed me up a few times in the match up. The question is, "Is the secret hunter deck better than the best-focused Midrange Hunter?"
That is the question, and I think not. Midrange is pretty solid right now, and secret is probably in a tier below it.
It's a fine counter that is completely unnecessary since mid-range can generate enough of an advantage against a deck that skips t1-3 that it's irrelevant.
Could be good, but imo counterspell is just flat out better.
Counterspell would be baited out with Backstab, Eviscerate, or Coin by any rogue with half a brain. It shouldn't ever catch their quest and at most will get a Shadowstep which only sets them back slightly. Snipe removing the minion completely could be somewhat handy if hunter weren't already so boss at killing rogues.
What do you think? Is Snipe a valid counter to the Quest Rogue? Yes, it just kills one of their minions, but they usually bank on bouncing that one multiple times.
It could slow them down enough. What do we think?
Could be good, but imo counterspell is just flat out better.
Always Hunters. Always Huffers.
Sounds like it will work well, except in certain moments they use Igneous Elemental, which might actually help them.
It's a fine counter that is completely unnecessary since mid-range can generate enough of an advantage against a deck that skips t1-3 that it's irrelevant.
Do you know what win more means?