Hearthpwn

This card is a joke, whoever thinks that is even slightly playable, they have no idea about this game.

does the vague text leave open the possibility that it could buff all your demons, whether on the board or in your hand?

I mean...

Voidcaller > Flame Imp > Imp Gang Boss > Trade Imp Gang Boss + Crystalweaver

Seems decent depending what sticks on the board. Note for Wild: Good with Imp-losion!

Quote from DMaster2 >>

Quote from Bilibilou >>

Quote from DMaster2 >>

Quote from Bilibilou >>

Quote from DMaster2 >>

Quote from BrokenCycle >>

Quote from Maximal18 >>

Bad, really bad, dissapointing

 WHAT????

 Too slow for zoolock, useless for renolock.

Dark Iron Dwarf

Dark Iron Dwarf in zoo? That isn't a thing since a long time man.

 Oh, a netdecker. I don't talk with your people.

 I'm currently maining a Yogg Priest. If that's netdecking for you, then so be it. Btw it doesn't take a netdecker to know if a card is underpowered but interesting from another that is simply bad from every point of view.

Tunnel Weasel is bad but at least it's an interesting card. It's worth trying it. This card is bad and uninteresting and don't have a place whatever warlock deck you play. Simply because Defender of Argus is strictly superior

Well built Wild Demonlock was about the power level of Deathrattle Rogue before MSG. Not t1, but definitely underrated and capable of reaching legend, and also excellent against aggro: Mistress of Pain, Demonfire, Demonheart, Antique Healbot, Lord Jaraxxus, Mal'Ganis for minimum of 7 health, MoP synergy, more health to your taunts. After Crystalweaver (and Abyssal Enforcer) there is no doubt that Demonlock is a good deck. Still probably underrated and not very much played.

Quote from DMaster2 >>

Quote from Blue_Banana_whotookthisname >>

Here, have a bad card.

 Wow +1/+1 on a couple of (tiny) demons. What is that picture supposed to prove exactly?

Quote from DMaster2 >>

Quote from Blue_Banana_whotookthisname >>

Quote from DMaster2 >>

Quote from Blue_Banana_whotookthisname >>

Here, have a bad card.

 Wow +1/+1 on a couple of (tiny) demons. What is that picture supposed to prove exactly?

3 minions is a couple? That's not a bad board for a midrange/control deck. The minions' size is irrelevant. That's total of 8/7 stats for 4 mana. You made a comparison to Defender of Argus, is that a bad card? Crystalweaver has +3/+1 and potential to buff more minions.

 Defender of Argus is good (in certain decks mind you) because it hits anything AND give TAUNT (caps needed). This is just a winmoar card. Your picture just show that. You at 28 with a board, your opponent at 6 with no board. But if your opponent have the board and you have nothing? It's just a 4 mana 5/4.

Btw i've won with a grim hunter dropping an 8/8 Angry Chicken (that i pinged for the enrage). Angry chicken is good then? Nope it's garbage.

Hungry Crab can win you a game if you drop it t1 after your opponent played Murloc Tidecaller t1. Does that make hungry crab a good card? Nope. Bad cards can be good in the right spot. That doesn't make them good cards.

Good cards for example don't need a board to do something, and if they do they should impact said board in a meaningful way (ex. defender give taunt to creatures).

Quote from Boethion >>

This is amazing in Zoo, because you run 6 1-cost Demons aswell as Imp Gang Boss who also spawns more Demons himself. It is way better than Defender of Argus in most cases, unless you really need to Taunt up. The 5/4 body is still strong enough that its always playable unlike Defender of Argus.

If we get a couple more earlygame Demons (which is likely since we lose 3 cheap Demons with the next rotation), then this card only becomes stronger and stronger. Zoo always played Defender of Argus or at least Dire Wolf Alpha, so this is a natural fit for any Zoo-deck and even got potential in a future Midrange-Demonlock.