Why is a Gorilla a beast but a Gnoll is not?! That's not cool. :'(
Gnolls are classified as humanoids according to WoW biology.
Gorillas are classified as humanoids according to real-life biology. I don't think being Humanoid is the seperator for whether something is a beast or not.
Just tell me you are joking, please... Gorillas are hominids like humans, but they aren't humanoids, it's not the same thing, lmao.
Why is a Gorilla a beast but a Gnoll is not?! That's not cool. :'(
Gnolls are classified as humanoids according to WoW biology.
Gorillas are classified as humanoids according to real-life biology. I don't think being Humanoid is the seperator for whether something is a beast or not.
Just tell me you are joking, please... Gorillas are hominids like humans, but they aren't humanoids, it's not the same thing, lmao.
I was refering to anatomical structure which is the only thing calling Gnolls "humanoids" could reasonably mean. Unless you mean to say that Gnolls evolved from humans which is unlikely.
hu·man·oid
ˈ(h)yo͞oməˌnoid/
adjective
1.
having an appearance or character resembling that of a human.
noun
1.
(especially in science fiction) a being resembling a human in its shape.
Why is a Gorilla a beast but a Gnoll is not?! That's not cool. :'(
Gnolls are classified as humanoids according to WoW biology.
Gorillas are classified as humanoids according to real-life biology. I don't think being Humanoid is the seperator for whether something is a beast or not.
Just tell me you are joking, please... Gorillas are hominids like humans, but they aren't humanoids, it's not the same thing, lmao.
I was refering to anatomical structure which is the only thing calling Gnolls "humanoids" could reasonably mean. Unless you mean to say that Gnolls evolved from humans which is unlikely.
having an appearance or character resembling that of a human.
noun
1.
(especially in science fiction) a being resembling a human in its shape.
You said in your previous post that Gorillas are considered humanoids according to real-life biology, which is totally ridiculous and obviously not true, and that is why I replied to it. I don't care why Blizzard classify Gnolls as humanoids, and I never said they evolved from humans or something like that.
Since they're creating legendary characters that do not appear in WoW they should have named this card "Winston" after the Overwatch Hero. I mean they already incorporated heroes of the storm lore with nexus champ saraad. I think it would have been a nice way to make the card more interesting to fans of both games.
Since they're creating legendary characters that do not appear in WoW they should have named this card "Winston" after the Overwatch Hero. I mean they already incorporated heroes of the storm lore with nexus champ saraad. I think it would have been a nice way to make the card more interesting to fans of both games.
Nexus-Champion Saraad is an ethereal. Ethereals are from Warcraft. Besides, Winston is an intelligent gorilla. Knuckles is the slobbering, slack-jawed embodiment of SMOrc.
Unplayable bad. Stats are total shit a Turtle for +1 mana gain +1 attack is a terrible trade and the effekt is hardly relevant. One of the worst cards of the set sofar.
Are you serious? Have you been sleeping this whole week? From Monday all the way until today it's been the Grimy Goons week and the Grimy Goons are all about buffing minions in hand. This minion is also meant to be buffed for maximum value. Seriously think about the synergies a card has before calling it crap.
Also this is not like the dam Oasis Snapjaw, it also has the power to ignore Taunt and is a good control card and it fits well into the 5 mana slot which is a little bit weak at the moment.
No i havent that why I know there are cards like doppelgangster or Kodo were i want my buffs wayway more on than on this and those are even decent stand alone so no this wont see play.
Considering the theme of the goons is to buff minions in your hand, odds are good it will be fairly beefy by the time you actually play him. And now Taunters can't save you from this gorilla.
Why is a Gorilla a beast but a Gnoll is not?! That's not cool. :'(
Gnolls are classified as humanoids according to WoW biology.
Gorillas are classified as humanoids according to real-life biology. I don't think being Humanoid is the seperator for whether something is a beast or not.
Just tell me you are joking, please... Gorillas are hominids like humans, but they aren't humanoids, it's not the same thing, lmao.
in wow a hunter can tame a gorilla for a pet. He cant tame a gnoll. this is based on wow lore anyway not real life
Yeah, thus returning to my original point. Gorillas = Beasts, Gnolls = Humanoids in WoW. Forget what real life tells you.
If its get buffed its realy nice
this card was designed for the sole purpose of mocking smorc on forums.
Cool card. It fits the class really well.
A 5 mana 3/7 vanilla card is not bad. With beast tag it's almost playable and the effect is huge.
Since they're creating legendary characters that do not appear in WoW they should have named this card "Winston" after the Overwatch Hero. I mean they already incorporated heroes of the storm lore with nexus champ saraad. I think it would have been a nice way to make the card more interesting to fans of both games.
"Hey Pal, Trade Prince Gallywix here!"
All Classes Golden - 11/5/2016
fine
MTG kind trample
Not gonna lie, I kinda dig him.
Considering the theme of the goons is to buff minions in your hand, odds are good it will be fairly beefy by the time you actually play him. And now Taunters can't save you from this gorilla.
Now Hunters can trade and STILL go face.
Plus he's a beast, so the chain remains unbroken.
Cobra Shot in minion form with 7 health. Insane with buffs.
It's cool, but I don't think it will see play. We need more control cards for this to work out.
Could be a really good card in Midrange Hunter decks. It has crazy value if you buff it. Could potentially be a really good card. We'll see I guess.
Great card.