It's one of the most toxic cards I have ever seen (even with 7/7 4 mana).It's not only the fact that Tiger + this is just beyond broken but the fact druids are now lords of the curve stone (1,2,3,4,5,6)
Beast druid is already playable. It isn't quite a top tier deck, but it has serious blowout potential, and if it gets ahead on board, it usually wins. This card following up on tiger, which is already played in Beast druid, will be broken.
As I said before, Faceless Summoner is most of the time the better card. Is mage broken...is it the age of mage right now? No.
Unlike faceless, Menagerie warden has a requirement to bring any good value....having a beast on board. In addition to this requirement (unless you are zoo you aren't guaranteed you can keep creatures on the board through the next turn), it is only better than Faceless if it hits an undamaged 4 mana cost creature or higher.
Beast druid, the class with weak board clears, no good removal, and little card draw will suddenly be broken with this worse version of Faceless summoner. Sure thing.
As I said before, Faceless Summoner is most of the time the better card. Is mage broken...is it the age of mage right now? No.
I don't think so, with new card you can control what you get and a 5/5 stealth is much better than a random 3 mana minion.
Is very hard to remove a 5/5 stealth in turn 5, you can say there is a chance of you draw 2 of the new card and none of tiger, but is not that hard you have a beast 4/4 in board when use this and 4/4 is better than a random 3 mana minion.
Faceless Summoner don't have much use because mage is a spell base class and not a minion base class like beast druid.
Does "Summon a copy of it" mean that it also copies buffs/health? So let's say a 7/7 tiger (Mark of Y'Shaarj) without stealth would become a 7/7 without stealth, a 7/7 with stealth or a 5/5 with/without?
Tha's actually a pretty good question, that strangely, I haven't seen anybody asking. But IMO, I think it will be the same effect than Faceless Manipulator. In other words; 6 mana = 5 mana Faceless Manipulator that can only copy friendly beasts + 1 mana 5/5 body.
Overhyped as shit, just like cloaked huntress, no one plays that in any serious deck. Beast druid has no card draw, no good clears, the few amount of beasts you do have won t survive to combo or wont even be in your hand in the first place. Good card, would have broken the game in hunter, beast druid ? Meh
Beast druid has as much card draw/clears as you put into it. I'll be running Fandral + Raven Idol/Wrath in mine (not to mention Mark of Y'shaarj). Also, since beast druid will be a mid-range deck, all they have to do is play minions on curve. It's hard to run out of cards when you just draw-one-play-one each turn.
As a comparison; midrange shaman runs very few card draw/clears, and they do just fine.
Beast druid has as much card draw as you put into it. I'll be running Fandral + Raven Idol/Wrath in mine (not to mention Mark of Y'shaarj). Also, since beast druid will be a mid-range deck, all they have to do is play minions on curve. It's hard to run out of cards when you just draw-one-play-one each turn.
Ya let me know how those living roots, innervate and potw topdecks on turn 10+ work out for you. Ive played beast druid a lot, this happens on a regular basis, it s inconsistent af, it can steamroll you on turn 5 but most of the time it feels like a crappy face hunter that runs out of steam on turn 6 or less, 1 card wont make it top tier or cancer like 99% of this thread keeps saying, but hey i might be wrong,
Ran into a few beast druids so far and man are they annoying. Warden is just ridiculous if you can combo it. I had two different beast druids innervate to copy a Mounted Raptor on turn 4, and one of them followed up with stranglethorn into warden turn 5 and 6. I know this kind of stuff won't happen every game (and who knows how consistent it will be), but I felt really helpless really quickly. Beast druid can REALLY snowball between Warden and the new 1 mana 2/2.
Ran into a few beast druids so far and man are they annoying. Warden is just ridiculous if you can combo it. I had two different beast druids innervate to copy a Mounted Raptor on turn 4, and one of them followed up with stranglethorn into warden turn 5 and 6. I know this kind of stuff won't happen every game (and who knows how consistent it will be), but I felt really helpless really quickly. Beast druid can REALLY snowball between Warden and the new 1 mana 2/2.
well its pretty hard to stol tiger into warden if they have it. its just interesting that this comes after stranglethorn actually saw high end play in a lot of hunter decks.
I don't think the card is bad (actually, I think it is pretty good), but sorry, I don't want to sound like a jerk, but a game at rank 16 proves nothing, especially during the last days of a season.
Brawl or Foul Bane turn 5 Corrupted Seer turn 6 can takecare of the tiger combo . But if they can snowball from turn1 with the raven then brawl maybe the only answer
I don't think the card is bad (actually, I think it is pretty good), but sorry, I don't want to sound like a jerk, but a game at rank 16 proves nothing, especially during the last days of a season.
In a world with Emperor Thaurissan.
It's one of the most toxic cards I have ever seen (even with 7/7 4 mana).It's not only the fact that Tiger + this is just beyond broken but the fact druids are now lords of the curve stone (1,2,3,4,5,6)
Less than a week 'till the "Warden Druid" cancer meta, boys. Prepare your anus.
Release the Kraken!
Beast druid is already playable. It isn't quite a top tier deck, but it has serious blowout potential, and if it gets ahead on board, it usually wins. This card following up on tiger, which is already played in Beast druid, will be broken.
As I said before, Faceless Summoner is most of the time the better card. Is mage broken...is it the age of mage right now? No.
Unlike faceless, Menagerie warden has a requirement to bring any good value....having a beast on board. In addition to this requirement (unless you are zoo you aren't guaranteed you can keep creatures on the board through the next turn), it is only better than Faceless if it hits an undamaged 4 mana cost creature or higher.
Beast druid, the class with weak board clears, no good removal, and little card draw will suddenly be broken with this worse version of Faceless summoner. Sure thing.
Brace for impact.
Overhyped as shit, just like cloaked huntress, no one plays that in any serious deck. Beast druid has no card draw, no good clears, the few amount of beasts you do have won t survive to combo or wont even be in your hand in the first place. Good card, would have broken the game in hunter, beast druid ? Meh
Beast druid has as much card draw/clears as you put into it. I'll be running Fandral + Raven Idol/Wrath in mine (not to mention Mark of Y'shaarj). Also, since beast druid will be a mid-range deck, all they have to do is play minions on curve. It's hard to run out of cards when you just draw-one-play-one each turn.
As a comparison; midrange shaman runs very few card draw/clears, and they do just fine.
Ran into a few beast druids so far and man are they annoying. Warden is just ridiculous if you can combo it. I had two different beast druids innervate to copy a Mounted Raptor on turn 4, and one of them followed up with stranglethorn into warden turn 5 and 6. I know this kind of stuff won't happen every game (and who knows how consistent it will be), but I felt really helpless really quickly. Beast druid can REALLY snowball between Warden and the new 1 mana 2/2.
Is this card good?
Yes... it's pretttyyyy goood.
Brawl or Foul Bane turn 5 Corrupted Seer turn 6 can takecare of the tiger combo . But if they can snowball from turn1 with the raven then brawl maybe the only answer
It proves I have a full time job. Legend? Been there, done that. That shit is a grind and not fun at all.
Should I report you for trolling... as you have done numerous times to me?