i'm glad a lot of people understand how strong this card is in control decks and in arena. as an arena player, having the ability to basically has a conecrate AND for 2 extra mana get a 2/3 out of it is very nice. is it gonna break the game? unless murloc paladin explodes, i doubt it, but it will be a strong card overall....as long as we can survive to turn 6 and not just get steamrolled by shamans
Well, this thread indicates how little people know about HS. Maybe this card will see a play, maybe not..but not because it is bad, card is actually pretty good (do you hear kripp voice?) but maybe it wont fit into many decks.
Blizzard, 6 mana deal 2 damage to all enemies - very playable
This guy, 6 mana deal 2 damage to all minions - 2-3 body - Trash?
right.
1.The freeze is quite relevant
2. it doesn't damage your board.
it's dependant on if murloc decks are a thing or if some decks run very little minions on classes with little AOE options.. (mainly rogue, post blade flurry nerf it's quite a big deal.)
Blizzard, 6 mana deal 2 damage to all enemies - very playable
This guy, 6 mana deal 2 damage to all minions - 2-3 body - Trash?
right.
1.The freeze is quite relevant
2. it doesn't damage your board.
it's dependant on if murloc decks are a thing or if some decks run very little minions on classes with little AOE options.. (mainly rogue, post blade flurry nerf it's quite a big deal.)
Actually, this is type of murloc, which doesn't need to be only in murloc decks ..it is solid card and if these little dudes and tokens will become an issue, this little guy may really help out...in murloc decks it's obviously super good to not include at least one.
It's like the murloc Knight, or, some times ago, Neptulon: some murloc cards do not necessarily need to be in a murloc deck. This is another great example.
Great card, will make the Paladin Murloc Flood list. Allows you to Consecrate while still playing Murlocs.
Which is great cause in old Murloc decks, anything other than playing Murlocs was pretty bad. Consecrate always felt on the edge of playability cause it just didn't do enough in this deck.
Now that you are playing a Murloc at the same time, it makes it so much better. And also in the new meta I feel Consec might be more valuable than last time I was playing Murlocs.
Rating should be based on how good the card is for it's intended deck, not just about how many decks it fits into. And in the Murloc deck, this card is great.
I. Just imagined this guy in mill rogue as a replacement for bladeflurry.
i'm glad a lot of people understand how strong this card is in control decks and in arena. as an arena player, having the ability to basically has a conecrate AND for 2 extra mana get a 2/3 out of it is very nice. is it gonna break the game? unless murloc paladin explodes, i doubt it, but it will be a strong card overall....as long as we can survive to turn 6 and not just get steamrolled by shamans
Another patron activator. Kappa.
Too much cost for murlock deck...
This is extremely
powerfulslow.I will crush you!
Well, this thread indicates how little people know about HS. Maybe this card will see a play, maybe not..but not because it is bad, card is actually pretty good (do you hear kripp voice?) but maybe it wont fit into many decks.
After reading the comments in this thread I would want this card to be top tier and murloc decks being the next big thing lol
shaman or paladin could use this WILL be tried it COULD work, murlocs are more likely to survive now with less sticky earlygame minions.
If murloc decks ever slow down, which they very well may, this guy will be a 1-of at least in most lists.
It's like the murloc Knight, or, some times ago, Neptulon: some murloc cards do not necessarily need to be in a murloc deck. This is another great example.
Hello.
Great card, will make the Paladin Murloc Flood list. Allows you to Consecrate while still playing Murlocs.
Which is great cause in old Murloc decks, anything other than playing Murlocs was pretty bad. Consecrate always felt on the edge of playability cause it just didn't do enough in this deck.
Now that you are playing a Murloc at the same time, it makes it so much better. And also in the new meta I feel Consec might be more valuable than last time I was playing Murlocs.
Rating should be based on how good the card is for it's intended deck, not just about how many decks it fits into. And in the Murloc deck, this card is great.
4/5 - Very good
no, just no
3/10
horrible stats, decent art, decent ability
If evolution is outlawed, only outlaws will evolve.
I've spent most of the day trying to compose possible paladin murloc lists.
The real trouble i've found is the lack of relevant 5 drops, which suggest that the curve should end at 4.
Therefore I think that this being 6 mana it will not see play.
If it were at 5 mana and less stats it would solve some inherent problems with midrange murloc pally in particular.
I like the card though.