Hearthpwn

Quote from SchruteBucks >>

Arcane Nullifier X-21 with a bigger body.  Probably not game changing but I could see it being pretty strong in slower control decks. 

Quote from Shokusher >>

I don't think the effect is worth 9 mana. For 9 mana I don't want just a taunt, I want a finisher. I need to stabilizers early and finishers later.

It's not unplayable if you manage to pull this in a cheaper way with cards like Aviana, Naga Sea Witch or Y'Shaarj, Rage Unbound.

The Black Knight rises.

I kinda like the card. Nine mana, though...

Playing this costs 9 mana but its very hard to deal with. Its ok for a deck that is prepared for a long game, but control warrior is sad because you cant tank up the same turn you play this.

DOUBLE OWL EVERY DECK

I suppose if I absolutely, positively, have to make sure my opponent isn't swinging at my face, this would be nice.  The issue is that that might happen at turn 6 or 7, maybe even turn 5, while I have to wait until turn 9 to play this.  Even so, silence is a thing (Tangent Alert!!  It really shouldn't.  I mean, its possibly the least fun mechanic in the game, mostly because off how it can simply reduce games to a stat battle, without all of the zany effects that make Hearthstone fun.  It almost always from the 2 mana Ironbeak Owl, making it nearly always worth the subpar 2/1, and just one of them usually hits something important, making playing Legendary cards feel like a waste since they are usually costed around their effects.  Silence, in my opinion, actually pushes the game towards a solely aggressive meta more than charge does.  And thats's just terrible.  This conclude this tangent.) so, it could lose a lot of its value quickly.  Either way, if you think you truly need a gigantic taunt, this is your guy , and quite handy if you ever get it out of The Golden Monkey.

Y'sharrj control? 

They aren't going to nerf silence.  Also I guess all cards suck unless they are invincible and uncounterable according to logic of many in this thread.

Printing a neutral Ancient of War would be too disruptive, I think it makes sense as a legendary (1 per deck), but it would make more sense at 8 mana.

Finally a neutral legendary that I want to craft in this game other than the Old Gods.

Can't wait to play this after playing Naga Sea Witch.

its interesting as Eldrazi become a huge thing in MTG with BFZ and Oath, hearthstone is releasing there own big "monsters". not saying Blizzard is copying Wizards, just a comparison. whatever the case is im very excited for this new set.

it should read:

Taunt

Can't be target by hero powers/spells

Your hero is Immune

8 mana, 6/9

Now this would make it playable, even meta defining, but as everybody(me include) said it's too slow against decks that are trying to kill you fast and weak stats against decks that are not in a hurry to kill you, 

If they nerf Owl, this card will be a pretty big pain in the butt to get through.

Id rather Ysera

When I saw this card I was like wow nice stats and effect, I'd like to play it, BUT THEN 9 MANA WHY BLIZZARD !

Probably not as bad as it looks. Still not good. I mean, it could do fine by stabilizing that last aggro push, as it will kill anything that attacks into it and absorb 9 damage. But probably too expensive to be effective on a level you'd actually want this in your deck. Maybe if we get some serious incentive to play big minions... maybe joust? So iffy.

It's weak to silence and the stats are pretty poor for 9 mana. I don't think it will see play. It would eat a couple of 5-6 drops so it can gain value that way, but anything even close to its own mana cost will eat it right up. If no one has dead and no one has spell lethal on turn 9 then you're likely not playing against aggro and that's really the only thing I think this card will do really good against.

This will be a useful tool for a number of slower decks.  Not too exciting, but very solid and balanced.