Consider the following: Would a 6 mana 5/5 that gives you spare parts see any play? Probably yes, in a deck or two. Then consider that this is more reliable, and arguably better value on average. This is pretty good card overall, nice job to Team 5 on this one.
There is Toshley which is a 5/7, it doesn't see much play.
Consider the following: Would a 6 mana 5/5 that gives you spare parts see any play? Probably yes, in a deck or two. Then consider that this is more reliable, and arguably better value on average. This is pretty good card overall, nice job to Team 5 on this one.
You mean Toshley ? The card that is without a doubt better than this piece of junk and didn't see any play when it came out? This card is nothing more than a filler legendary.
Toshley [/card]was released along [card]dr.boom,Piloted Shredder and in a fast meta since naxxramas if the meta would allow it Toshley would be a stample in tempo mage, it was played sometimes in the deck an was ok.. now in standard the meta is expected to slow down.. this card can make the 2 bananas into fireballs or something it's quite good..
I really really hope I don't open this card in a pack. Toshley hardly saw play though I liked him. Nobody plays Grand Crusader. This is worse than both.
Maybe...just maybe....he adds tavern brawl style bananas to your hand? Like Big Banana? Then maybe he would be almost playable?
dont be to quick to judge,this card could be really good,remember dr.boom people said its bad when it was first reviled ,in my opinion this can be OP card in tempo mage,it could replace dr.boom since its going away in standard
May be used, or not. But it's pretty boring and unoriginal for a legendary and the "corrupted" version of other cards is getting old pretty fast. They could easily fill the expansion with stuff from Ahn'Qiraj, Vashj'ir, Ulduar, Hearth of Fear, elementals, the Twilight Hammer, and other Old God related content but I guess they like this "funny" rehash of old cards.
Consider the following: Would a 6 mana 5/5 that gives you spare parts see any play? Probably yes, in a deck or two. Then consider that this is more reliable, and arguably better value on average. This is pretty good card overall, nice job to Team 5 on this one.
You mean Toshley ? The card that is without a doubt better than this piece of junk and didn't see any play when it came out? This card is nothing more than a filler legendary.
not really thosly will only give you one spell from his battlecry which does matter when you play with mage also this is a beast so hunter synarge with lock and load (that is more for fun)
But Mukla is the same as getting two of each Whirling Blades and Armor Plating, except it would cost 4 mana. Toshley also only has a 14% chance of giving you a specific spare part, and he has to die for you to get the other one. Mukla immediately gives you the equivalent of all four, but for two less mana and two less cards. The two aren't even comparable in that regard.
Furthermore, a priest could theoretically run this card and turn a 4 attack minion into a 5 attack to kill it with Shadow Word: Death.
So normal Mukkla: 3 Mana, give your opponent the 2 bananas
This Mukkla: 6 mana give yourself the 2 bananas.
The 2 bananas are worth 3 mana.
Every banana is worth 1,5 mana.
Hmm, seems ok, could be better;)
It's actually a 4-banana swing. With mukla your opponent gets 2 bananas and you get a 5/5 for 3 mana. At this point you are -2 bananas compared to your opponent. With corrupted mukla you pay 6 mana, get a 5/5 and gain 2 bananas. You now have 2 bananas, your opponent has none, so you are +2 bananas. The difference between a -2 and +2 position is 4 bananas. 3 mana/4 bananas= .75 mana per banana.
I don't think, you put a card like this in a deck with spell trigers, the next turn you can play Flamewaker and two bananas, Toshley need to die first for you have the second spell, and sometimes you get a useless part don't have a target.
Card for card, no combinations,, I agree with you.
Serious failure of design, logic and imagination on Blizzard's part.
The idea that the Old Gods corrupt characters that are already bad into being good is simply stupid. When new evil guys show up the existing evil guys don't say "hey, I think I'll be a good guy now".
Nobody was asking for new variants on existing named character cards. Old Mukla gave bananas to your opponent. But new Mukla gives bananas to YOU! Does anybody find this clever?
I used Toshley for long time in tempo mage and was very nice. Maybe it will see play but I'm guess not.
For sure I will try to play this with Brann just to fill my hand with bananas, maybe in Shaman, to see buffed totems. What I will do next I have no idea, probably concede...
Would be much better if creeper and muster weren't rotating out. It will see some play in Miracle rogue, djinni priest needs at least 1 more good buff card to be a thing, even with that it probably wont get its own archetype. Maybe a djinni flavoured dragon priest.
I would rather play Mukla for 3 mana than this corrupted version of Mukla for 6 mana.
I really really hope I don't open this card in a pack. Toshley hardly saw play though I liked him. Nobody plays Grand Crusader. This is worse than both.
Maybe...just maybe....he adds tavern brawl style bananas to your hand? Like Big Banana? Then maybe he would be almost playable?
dont be to quick to judge,this card could be really good,remember dr.boom people said its bad when it was first reviled ,in my opinion this can be OP card in tempo mage,it could replace dr.boom since its going away in standard
really like this card ;) wonder if bananas are +1/1 or +2/2 ?!
May be used, or not.
But it's pretty boring and unoriginal for a legendary and the "corrupted" version of other cards is getting old pretty fast.
They could easily fill the expansion with stuff from Ahn'Qiraj, Vashj'ir, Ulduar, Hearth of Fear, elementals, the Twilight Hammer, and other Old God related content but I guess they like this "funny" rehash of old cards.
Imma shove those bananas up ben brode
"Hey Pal, Trade Prince Gallywix here!"
All Classes Golden - 11/5/2016
Serious failure of design, logic and imagination on Blizzard's part.
The idea that the Old Gods corrupt characters that are already bad into being good is simply stupid. When new evil guys show up the existing evil guys don't say "hey, I think I'll be a good guy now".
Nobody was asking for new variants on existing named character cards. Old Mukla gave bananas to your opponent. But new Mukla gives bananas to YOU! Does anybody find this clever?
I used Toshley for long time in tempo mage and was very nice. Maybe it will see play but I'm guess not.
For sure I will try to play this with Brann just to fill my hand with bananas, maybe in Shaman, to see buffed totems. What I will do next I have no idea, probably concede...
Well, this one is somewhat playable. Quite underwhelming, but playable. Not as bad as Boogeymonster, of course.
Click to see my Hearthstone projects:
Boring but reliable. It will find a place in several decks, I think.
Could fit miracle rogue with Brann Bronzebeard, four bananas ka-ching.
Hope I open this beast in a pack, want him for my tempo maging!
-let´s negotiate: you concede and I let you live...
Would be much better if creeper and muster weren't rotating out. It will see some play in Miracle rogue, djinni priest needs at least 1 more good buff card to be a thing, even with that it probably wont get its own archetype. Maybe a djinni flavoured dragon priest.
[url=http://signaturecraft.us/][img]http://signaturecraft.us/signatures/eJxzyyxKVUgqLcorVkgqykzPKFHIzFMoyUhVSEksyubyLIHKpZal5kEVpBYplGekghUVpRYrJCoUF4CUBmTkp-ZlVphbGnO556co-KcphCcWcbkApRR0FZyA6n1Ti5IzUnO4jExN4dgQABU6KQY~.png[/img][/url]
He has good synergy with Archmage Antonidas