Yes they do. If they crafted it today for 1600, they lost 800 dust
No. They bought a thing for a price they deemed acceptable. They "lost" 1600 dust and "gained" a card. That card doesn't go away if the price changes. The only thing that changes - one who bought the card for the old price is now in a better situation because they can buy future cards for a lower price.
Would you think it is fair if Blizzard will decide to raise the price for legendaries to 3200 dust and charged you for 1600 "missing" dust? If no, how is it different from demanding a refund in case of the price reduction? Also, will you be happy if Blizzard will raise the price (without charging you) because your existing cards are "worth more" now?
Well, I hope the game gets cheaper, but when I read this posts here and the greed of the people arguing against refunds just because they know those will make it less likely for their idea to become reality, not because they think it’s unfair (which they still pretend to do) I really don’t care if you are able to play wild. also: why should the opinions of people not possessing wild cards even play a role in the discussion about refunds? And where is the discussion about making standard cheaper for wild players to get in? Because that’s expensive, lots of cards that will be useless in two years and that you don’t own because they are too bad to play in wild?
And lastly: this discussion is completely senseless, even without refunds it will not happen, because why should anyone play standard (where blizz makes the most money) when it’s double the price?
here is just a group of people wanting free stuff because they made the mistake to play standard when the rotations started.
why don’t complain about the overall price of the game? Why is it that dusting a card only grants a quarter of the dust regardless of the format? and lastly: when they half the cost of wild cards, they will for sure also half the amount of dust you get from dusting them. Which will make it even more unfair.
nice whataboutism with the price increase idea, which is completely different and not possible, because people with 0 dust would be rewarded.
Yes they do. If they crafted it today for 1600, they lost 800 dust
Okey, but what if, hypothetically, if the cards of "old players" still dust for 1600. So old players do not get dust, but their cards keep their dust value, would that feel better?
One thing that confuses me is that I have seen some wild players in the chat that says that it is unfeasible to get all cards, it is too expensive and takes too much work. Does that not mean that a lowered cost would benefit a lot of wild players as well? Like most wild players still want to get more cards right? (not all of course)
Well, I hope the game gets cheaper, but when I read this posts here and the greed of the people arguing against refunds just because they know those will make it less likely for their idea to become reality, not because they think it’s unfair (which they still pretend to do) I really don’t care if you are able to play wild. also: why should the opinions of people not possessing wild cards even play a role in the discussion about refunds? And where is the discussion about making standard cheaper for wild players to get in? Because that’s expensive, lots of cards that will be useless in two years and that you don’t own because they are too bad to play in wild?
And lastly: this discussion is completely senseless, even without refunds it will not happen, because why should anyone play standard (where blizz makes the most money) when it’s double the price?
here is just a group of people wanting free stuff because they made the mistake to play standard when the rotations started.
why don’t complain about the overall price of the game? Why is it that dusting a card only grants a quarter of the dust regardless of the format? and lastly: when they half the cost of wild cards, they will for sure also half the amount of dust you get from dusting them. Which will make it even more unfair.
nice whataboutism with the price increase idea, which is completely different and not possible, because people with 0 dust would be rewarded.
Yea nothing will most likely happen, but it can still be interesting to have the discussion and see if it exists interest. If everyone had your attitude nothing would ever change in the world.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
No. They bought a thing for a price they deemed acceptable. They "lost" 1600 dust and "gained" a card. That card doesn't go away if the price changes. The only thing that changes - one who bought the card for the old price is now in a better situation because they can buy future cards for a lower price.
Would you think it is fair if Blizzard will decide to raise the price for legendaries to 3200 dust and charged you for 1600 "missing" dust? If no, how is it different from demanding a refund in case of the price reduction? Also, will you be happy if Blizzard will raise the price (without charging you) because your existing cards are "worth more" now?
It would be amazing! As a F2P player who only plays wild it would be the best thing that could ever happen to me :D
Well, I hope the game gets cheaper, but when I read this posts here and the greed of the people arguing against refunds just because they know those will make it less likely for their idea to become reality, not because they think it’s unfair (which they still pretend to do) I really don’t care if you are able to play wild.
also: why should the opinions of people not possessing wild cards even play a role in the discussion about refunds? And where is the discussion about making standard cheaper for wild players to get in? Because that’s expensive, lots of cards that will be useless in two years and that you don’t own because they are too bad to play in wild?
And lastly: this discussion is completely senseless, even without refunds it will not happen, because why should anyone play standard (where blizz makes the most money) when it’s double the price?
here is just a group of people wanting free stuff because they made the mistake to play standard when the rotations started.
why don’t complain about the overall price of the game? Why is it that dusting a card only grants a quarter of the dust regardless of the format?
and lastly: when they half the cost of wild cards, they will for sure also half the amount of dust you get from dusting them. Which will make it even more unfair.
nice whataboutism with the price increase idea, which is completely different and not possible, because people with 0 dust would be rewarded.
Okey, but what if, hypothetically, if the cards of "old players" still dust for 1600. So old players do not get dust, but their cards keep their dust value, would that feel better?
One thing that confuses me is that I have seen some wild players in the chat that says that it is unfeasible to get all cards, it is too expensive and takes too much work. Does that not mean that a lowered cost would benefit a lot of wild players as well? Like most wild players still want to get more cards right? (not all of course)
Yea nothing will most likely happen, but it can still be interesting to have the discussion and see if it exists interest. If everyone had your attitude nothing would ever change in the world.