I dont give them the satisfaction of having an easy game, even tho i hate, despise and i wanna shit on them ress priests๐๐๐i do my best to kill em'
I've been playing standard renolock, so that matchup's been pretty free so far. If I were playing any sort of low-value deck I would just concede and take the loss, though. Just too unfun for me to bother.
If I play against Priest, I make sure I save my Devolving Missiles/Hex/Revolve for their huge death rattle minions so they just resurrect a bunch of frogs or imps.
Um yes, I do play the games out against one of the most popular/powerful class in Wild.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
There's nothing quite like going up against another member of the Nobility, after a run of players who quit if they can't win by turn 6. :)
What, you mean that priest players don't quit if they don't get an untransformed top-end threat by turn 6? (okay, there's the odd Raza, but most are res).
unfortunately "the squeaky wheel gets the oil" is a valid maxim and so...these kinds of posts are necessary for the game to flourish.
I stopped playing priest when the resurrection mechanics PRODUCE more minions than the deck limit allows. Sadly, I'm done with mage class too and its broken ass Conjurer's Calling, I've seen 8 mana put something like 45+ stats on the board, and go figure--they were taunts. Rogue and Wand Thief might be next. It's so broken how rogue can just discover so many of the powerful mage spells. The entire notion of classes and exclusivity was disrespected, bound, gagged, and spit upon by that kind of card.
What I find interesting is the amount of people who relish playing broken decks and "frustrating" others; alarming how ineffectual and socially-impotent people are compelled to resort to grieving others to whet their appetite for influence. Needs to be said but lemme stop virtue signaling.
Game-swinging RNG is really ruining this game for a lot of its players. Obviously the sickos enjoy it but for people who crave a modicum of skill-defined outcomes--it flies in the face of reason.
I love playing against priest, but I’m a mill rogue player so...
Go on
Here is my mill rogue data from deck tracker since january. I haven't played a lot on my computer lately, I play a lot on mobile, so not as many games recorded as I've played. 87% win rate against priest. Obviously aggro rogue and secret mage are not great matchups, but not unwinnable. The rogue data is especially inaccurate since most of those losses were before I put glacial shards in the deck. Glacial shards improved rogue win rate a lot, but I've mostly just played with them on mobile.
There's nothing quite like going up against another member of the Nobility, after a run of players who quit if they can't win by turn 6. :)
What, you mean that priest players don't quit if they don't get an untransformed top-end threat by turn 6? (okay, there's the odd Raza, but most are res).
Not sure where you get the idea that most are res priest. Maybe at lower mmrs. Raza priest is tier 1 while big priest is tier 2.
There's nothing quite like going up against another member of the Nobility, after a run of players who quit if they can't win by turn 6. :)
What, you mean that priest players don't quit if they don't get an untransformed top-end threat by turn 6? (okay, there's the odd Raza, but most are res).
Not sure where you get the idea that most are res priest. Maybe at lower mmrs. Raza priest is tier 1 while big priest is tier 2.
Last season or two I've been more standard, honestly - primarily trying to get some actual levels on DH while there's a decent non-aggro deck - and, playing jank in WIld I've generally seen more Big than Raza. Nice to see that Big is going by the wayside, honestly, even if my deck doesn't mind any priest :)
Can you be bothered with priest matches or do you just give them to the player?
Depends on what I’m playing. If I can burn them out fast enough or last into late game then yes. If I’m playing something like token druid though, no.
I dont give them the satisfaction of having an easy game, even tho i hate, despise and i wanna shit on them ress priests๐๐๐i do my best to kill em'
I've been playing standard renolock, so that matchup's been pretty free so far. If I were playing any sort of low-value deck I would just concede and take the loss, though. Just too unfun for me to bother.
I love playing against priest, but I’m a mill rogue player so...
If I play against Priest, I make sure I save my Devolving Missiles/Hex/Revolve for their huge death rattle minions so they just resurrect a bunch of frogs or imps.
Um yes, I do play the games out against one of the most popular/powerful class in Wild.
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
Well, I main Priest so yes, 100%
There's nothing quite like going up against another member of the Nobility, after a run of players who quit if they can't win by turn 6. :)
depends on my starting hand and first few draws, i'll try but if things are not lining up fast im out
What, you mean that priest players don't quit if they don't get an untransformed top-end threat by turn 6? (okay, there's the odd Raza, but most are res).
Lololololololol. Posts like this very much promote future priest games for folks like me. Frustration freebies are the best
Go on
unfortunately "the squeaky wheel gets the oil" is a valid maxim and so...these kinds of posts are necessary for the game to flourish.
I stopped playing priest when the resurrection mechanics PRODUCE more minions than the deck limit allows. Sadly, I'm done with mage class too and its broken ass Conjurer's Calling, I've seen 8 mana put something like 45+ stats on the board, and go figure--they were taunts. Rogue and Wand Thief might be next. It's so broken how rogue can just discover so many of the powerful mage spells. The entire notion of classes and exclusivity was disrespected, bound, gagged, and spit upon by that kind of card.
What I find interesting is the amount of people who relish playing broken decks and "frustrating" others; alarming how ineffectual and socially-impotent people are compelled to resort to grieving others to whet their appetite for influence. Needs to be said but lemme stop virtue signaling.
Game-swinging RNG is really ruining this game for a lot of its players. Obviously the sickos enjoy it but for people who crave a modicum of skill-defined outcomes--it flies in the face of reason.
Here is my mill rogue data from deck tracker since january. I haven't played a lot on my computer lately, I play a lot on mobile, so not as many games recorded as I've played. 87% win rate against priest. Obviously aggro rogue and secret mage are not great matchups, but not unwinnable. The rogue data is especially inaccurate since most of those losses were before I put glacial shards in the deck. Glacial shards improved rogue win rate a lot, but I've mostly just played with them on mobile.
You mean the 10th ranked class in the game?
That's very submissive. You need to have some self-respect and confidence.
on standard 50/50 unless they are res priest then i play until i dont, in Arena once a day is enough for me
edit. yea its a wild question seems to be far worse in wild - glad i dont play wild anymore
This is the wild forum dude. Priest has a tier 1 deck and a high tier 2 deck. Hunter, on the other hand, has its best deck at tier 4.
Not sure where you get the idea that most are res priest. Maybe at lower mmrs. Raza priest is tier 1 while big priest is tier 2.
Last season or two I've been more standard, honestly - primarily trying to get some actual levels on DH while there's a decent non-aggro deck - and, playing jank in WIld I've generally seen more Big than Raza. Nice to see that Big is going by the wayside, honestly, even if my deck doesn't mind any priest :)
That's an upside of playing priest on ladder - some people, even priests, just concede.