Hearthpwn

Is there tier list updated with LoE cards?

The LoE Adventure cards will be added later today. Making last minute rank adjustments before releasing them.

Fjola Lightbane is Rank D the same as Elise Starseeker?

Spider Tank is 3 cost 3/4 and is Rank S in every class, I wouldn't count on mech synergies so highly.

Reno Jackson Rank S in Warrior?

Why is Golden Monkey in the list? can you draft it?

Quote from Madars >>

Why is Golden Monkey in the list? can you draft it?

In a few minutes I'll be updating the lists to fix some of the LoE mistakes that were made went I first released the rankings. As always if there are any mistakes that I might have missed from the LoE portion or in general feel free to let me know.

Also, I've been working on doing a complete run through of the entire list from Classic - LoE for some time now. I originally had a bit of an overhaul for entire thread scheduled to be released some time next month. However with the announcement of the Standard & Wild Mode along with new expansion and a rework of some of the basic/classic cards I feel its best to hold on for both of these things to be  implemented before proceeding with the overhaul.

So stay tuned, and as always keep giving feedback, suggestions, and thoughts. Goes along way to helping this list be better, after all this list is for the community.

Quote from barradepan >>

How is the Class tier list after WotOG expansion?

Quote from barradepan >>

yes, sorry 4 the bad english xD

I don't usually look at tier lists, but looking at these almost makes me feel like I'm playing a whole different game. I wonder how many players really actually benefit from tier lists and how many players do worse after looking at tier lists due to a clash in playstyle. Seriously so many cards with a 3 tier difference from how I would classify them. My opinion already clashes with HearthArena's opinion from time to time, but some of these are much further off.

I don't want to say the tier lists are necessarily wrong, but it would involve playing so incredibly different from how I'd normally play that I wonder if most players actually fall under such a playstyle. An interesting read nonetheless. 

For Druid, I believe that Eydis Darkbane and Fjola Lightbane should be in the same tier.

Shaman rare section is missing Master of Evolution

Quote from Emanon >>

Quote from TianZi >>

I don't want to say the tier lists are necessarily wrong, but it would involve playing so incredibly different from how I'd normally play that I wonder if most players actually fall under such a playstyle. An interesting read nonetheless. 

Well, unfortunately they are. I don't want to come across as offensive, but whoever created these tierlists does not seem to have a good understanding of arena at all. There are so many cards which are simply evaluated wrong. Looking at the Druid class alone, why are Burly Rockjaw Trogg, Clockwork Knight and Tinkertown Technician considered A-Rank while Bog Creeper, Haunted Creeper or Druid of the Saber are a B!? Or in the Rare category: Corrupted Healbot, Corrupted Seer and Emperor Cobra are D-Rank...those are in fact above average/very good cards and putting them in the same category as an Ancient Watcher is quite ridiculous.

I could go on with this but there seems to be something fundamentally wrong about the evaluation of cards in these tierlists or am I overlooking something here? Newbies should better rely on Heartharena or The Lightforge - tierlists instead (sometimes I also disagree with some of the evaluations there but at least the evaluations are a lot more consistent than the hearthpwn lists).

Quote from SvizacCRO >>

Shaman rare section is missing Master of Evolution

You don't have Mark of Y'Shaarj in the Druid tier list. No big deal, just FYI.

Quote from TheHiddenNinja >>

In your druid list, in the 'epic' section, under 'S' rank, you have put 'Big Wisps', which is an uncollectible card. Also, the 'wisps of the old gods' choose one card is a 'D'rank card. Does this mean that these Wisps of the Old Gods are good? Please fix; you can't draft big wisps in any deck.

Quote from Mundus6 >>

Mc tech is only good vs paladin shaman or opponents that doesn't play around it. I would rate it B at best. Since it should 9 times out of 10 be 3/3 for 3 unless you fight bad opponents.

love it thanks for the help !!!

Quote from Nicholasjh >>

Although agaisnt mage it comes up less because you may already be playing around flamestrike.'

The Gadgetzan Update should be released fairly soon, currently resolving some technical issues which is slowing the process I hope to have it resolved by later to day and send out the update sometime after that tonight or early tomorrow.

I apologize for the delay but working diligently to get it to the community as quickly as I can..., Thank you.

Quote from Madars >>

Quote from Nicholasjh >>

Although agaisnt mage it comes up less because you may already be playing around flamestrike.'

 I agree for mage Mind Control Tech is not good for mage, since most players will try to not put on board many minions. Tho you wrote "against" mage