I agree and disagree, I just did 26 dmg in 1 turn with a stealth rogue, but I agree Paladin is broken and im really tired of playing always paladins, please nerf it to be the same as other classes, Win% right now is 62% paladin, and the other classes after that starts at 57%.....
Nice try for balance but you failed.Lunacy nerf was good.Paladin always dominating the meta.Not enough nerf for that class.A disgusting deck right now on the meta (Face Hunter).Every matchup face hunter-secret paladin-control warlock bla bla bla.Pen flinger nerf killed only Rogue class(Paladin got a lot of win condition every card is strong).Jandice nerf unnecessary btw.I can't play my rogue decks right now.
Rogue can't heal himself so bad matchup against aggro decks.
Rogue can't hit face hard and can't play for board(bcs haven't strong value cards) then bad matchup against control decks.
What is good with that class i really want to know ? :):)
Do you people even like, research anything before you spew garbage? There were a metric crap ton of rogues at grandmasters, and are a ton at high legend. Classes like shaman need far more love than rogue, which needs none.
I agree and disagree, I just did 26 dmg in 1 turn with a stealth rogue, but I agree Paladin is broken and im really tired of playing always paladins, please nerf it to be the same as other classes, Win% right now is 62% paladin, and the other classes after that starts at 57%.....
You lot can't seem to make your mind up about Paladin's win rate, this afternoon alone I've seen 62, 75 and 'over 70' touted as win %. What rank? What deck? What sample size?
It's so frustrating to try and communicate with people who only post snippets of what the actual story is. You just think it's fine to assert stuff but you need to provide evidence and context. This is a big part of why so many people just get directed at the salt thread. There's a huge difference between just whining and then actually posting constructive, data driven discussions.
It blows my mind that SO many people are just so damn bad at communicating.
You can't just say stuff and expect everyone to assume it's correct. Yet you do and a whole ton of people seem to think that's just fine as well. Do you work and stuff? If your boss said they were dismissing you because 'you're bad', would you not expect more context? A proper explanation? Rationale? Or would you literally just go "yeah, OK then, you say it so it must be facts".
That's another thing I see more and more and more - "speaking facts bro". No, that's not how facts work. I've seen an incredible amount of utter nonsense referred to as 'facts'. Demonstrably false things or clearly subjective things. I think there's an entire generation of people who don't actually know what a fact is. Probably the same sort of utter morons who say things like "but evolution, it's just a 'theory' though"...
Sorry for the rant, not all directed at you personally it's just an ever increasing frustration that comes about from seeing the same sort of thing day after day, week after week, month after month.
Where is the 62% from? Have you literally just gone to the hsreplay homepage or something? Because to my knowledge that provides zero context, it just takes data across all different ranks and classes some decks as 'secret paladin' that are arguably something else. If you go into the data you see different win rates for things like most popular deck, best performing deck etc but some of these sample sizes are tiny and as I said, I don't believe they account for rank etc. In fact, I just checked for the sake fo this argument and yes, you've just gone to the homepage. Click on paladin at tier one and you'll instantly see new data, the best performing is 59% but again, it's actually a small sample size and that will be made up of data built from different decklists but housed under what Hsreplay class as 'secret paladin'. Best performing is in the 70s but we all know that isn't a true reflection of the decks actual power level.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
hello
im a stupid player
i cant play rogue
so i whine
psalm 69:24
I agree and disagree, I just did 26 dmg in 1 turn with a stealth rogue, but I agree Paladin is broken and im really tired of playing always paladins, please nerf it to be the same as other classes, Win% right now is 62% paladin, and the other classes after that starts at 57%.....
Do you people even like, research anything before you spew garbage? There were a metric crap ton of rogues at grandmasters, and are a ton at high legend. Classes like shaman need far more love than rogue, which needs none.
You lot can't seem to make your mind up about Paladin's win rate, this afternoon alone I've seen 62, 75 and 'over 70' touted as win %. What rank? What deck? What sample size?
It's so frustrating to try and communicate with people who only post snippets of what the actual story is. You just think it's fine to assert stuff but you need to provide evidence and context. This is a big part of why so many people just get directed at the salt thread. There's a huge difference between just whining and then actually posting constructive, data driven discussions.
It blows my mind that SO many people are just so damn bad at communicating.
You can't just say stuff and expect everyone to assume it's correct. Yet you do and a whole ton of people seem to think that's just fine as well. Do you work and stuff? If your boss said they were dismissing you because 'you're bad', would you not expect more context? A proper explanation? Rationale? Or would you literally just go "yeah, OK then, you say it so it must be facts".
That's another thing I see more and more and more - "speaking facts bro". No, that's not how facts work. I've seen an incredible amount of utter nonsense referred to as 'facts'. Demonstrably false things or clearly subjective things. I think there's an entire generation of people who don't actually know what a fact is. Probably the same sort of utter morons who say things like "but evolution, it's just a 'theory' though"...
Sorry for the rant, not all directed at you personally it's just an ever increasing frustration that comes about from seeing the same sort of thing day after day, week after week, month after month.
Where is the 62% from? Have you literally just gone to the hsreplay homepage or something? Because to my knowledge that provides zero context, it just takes data across all different ranks and classes some decks as 'secret paladin' that are arguably something else. If you go into the data you see different win rates for things like most popular deck, best performing deck etc but some of these sample sizes are tiny and as I said, I don't believe they account for rank etc. In fact, I just checked for the sake fo this argument and yes, you've just gone to the homepage. Click on paladin at tier one and you'll instantly see new data, the best performing is 59% but again, it's actually a small sample size and that will be made up of data built from different decklists but housed under what Hsreplay class as 'secret paladin'. Best performing is in the 70s but we all know that isn't a true reflection of the decks actual power level.