Hearthpwn

The most RNG heavy and swingy. You can be winning af the whole game, your opponent plays an alextrasza and you just lost. This game is bullshit, the same applies to battlegrounds - only RNG with eudora and hooktust being absolutely the best with no competition. You need to extremely highroll to beat them.

I think the post nerf meta is going to be much worse as highlander hunter dominates.

Worst? No. Very RNG based and low skill? Yes. 

I got to Diamond five playing nothing but pure paladin

Next expansion it is my turn to make "Worst meta ever" thread.

made easy legend with murloc pally

I’m not a big fan of this meta. It’s definitely not the worst but it is very... boring in my opinion. There are quite a lot of decks but not many of them are fun to play against. Lots of Aggro decks which are all pretty similar to play against and so many of the control decks seem completely RnG based like Highlander Mage, Gala Rogue and Gala Priest.

Worst ever was the meta when they bought Evolve and N’Zoth back into Standard for two months or so. The decks were so oppressive. Gadgetzhan was really bad too. Literally four playable decks in Pirate Warrior, Aggro Shaman, Renolock and Dragon Priest. 

Best was Ungoro after the Rogue Quest nerf.

I´m playing wild just because of the meta in standard. Imo Galakrond is the most boring thing ever in hs. Five classes playing nearly the same cards. The rest is playing highlander with also nearly the same cards. Nearly every deck is Galakrond or highlander. To boring for me. I really hope Blizz will never ever split up the ten classes in just two different types. Imo MSG was better at that point, cause there were tree different types. 

Warrior plays 3 archetypes, none of which is Galakrond. The most popular Warlock deck is the quest, also no Galakrond. Shaman is not very popular, but you might see a bit of everything: Galakrond, Highlander, Totem....So only Rogue (which is almost gone after the nerfs) and Priest actually play Galakrond consistently. And only Hunter and Mage play Highlander and for a good reason: they have a class-specific powerful highlander minion (Brann and Reno). Apart from that you see a couple of aggro decks like Face Hunter, Murloc Pally and so on. And of course Spell Druid is also super popular and has nothing to do with Highlander or Gala. So, I've no idea what you are talking about.

I am so sick of playing against priests. Last two days I've queued up against about 7 priests, two hunters, one rogue, one warlock while doing dailies. Makes me not even want to play on ladder.

Quote from Kathranis >>

I am so sick of playing against priests. Last two days I've queued up against about 7 priests, two hunters, one rogue, one warlock while doing dailies. Makes me not even want to play on ladder.

 Most of the decks I go up against are Priests as well; none of their decks are fun to play against. And if it isn't Priest it is Demon Hunter with their perfect mana curve.

IMO tier 1 and 2 is lacking consistency, but overall it's far from being the worst meta. MSG with highlanders and pirate, KaC with Cubelock, Odd and Even era were much worse.

The worst meta without a doubt was the Doom in the Catacombs or Undertaker Huntera