I'd say it would simply depend on the deck I'm playing. For the past week I've been playing a lot of Pure Paladin and the most annoying enemy is priest, since it's easy for them to drag me into a long fight and to out-value me in the end. However, I think an addition of something like you suggested is not healthy for the game, because the biggest fun is in the variety and basically by banning something like DH, you're not gonna have the chance to get satisfacton from beating them. These are just my thoughts, but since the majority of the community thinks in rather simplier terms, like "DH is too op, so I would always ban it" I think an opinion like mine is not really popular. However, if you've ever played League of Legends (for example), you have probably experienced something similiar. On low levels some champions, let's take Yasuo for example, are considered opressive and therefore they are banned in almost every single game. If you play on high level (lke Plat+) you should see that Yasuo is not really that strong, because other champions are much better, if you master them. Similiar to DH, Yasuo is just easy to learn, but that doesn't mean that he can't be beaten by other champs. If you look at meta statistics on HSreplay, you can see that there is great difference between the winrates of DH in low ranks and in high ranks. Therefore, sentences like "DH is stupid, just delete him" are pointless.
I'd say it would simply depend on the deck I'm playing. For the past week I've been playing a lot of Pure Paladin and the most annoying enemy is priest, since it's easy for them to drag me into a long fight and to out-value me in the end. However, I think an addition of something like you suggested is not healthy for the game, because the biggest fun is in the variety and basically by banning something like DH, you're not gonna have the chance to get satisfacton from beating them. These are just my thoughts, but since the majority of the community thinks in rather simplier terms, like "DH is too op, so I would always ban it" I think an opinion like mine is not really popular. However, if you've ever played League of Legends (for example), you have probably experienced something similiar. On low levels some champions, let's take Yasuo for example, are considered opressive and therefore they are banned in almost every single game. If you play on high level (lke Plat+) you should see that Yasuo is not really that strong, because other champions are much better, if you master them. Similiar to DH, Yasuo is just easy to learn, but that doesn't mean that he can't be beaten by other champs. If you look at meta statistics on HSreplay, you can see that there is great difference between the winrates of DH in low ranks and in high ranks. Therefore, sentences like "DH is stupid, just delete him" are pointless.
I definitely agree!!beating DH is so great lol. I always look forward to DH now. Only good card they’ve got is the 4/2 legendary and once that’s gone the game is over. It’s just an easy win imo. And hell, if I do lose then the games over in like 3minutes haha.
I don't really care about standard priest, it's just the most annoying of the current standard stuff imo, but I really hate all the different stupid uninteractive OTK bullshit druid works with in wild.
Priest for standard is simply because it's shit to play against them. Even when winning, it's an excruciatingly infuriating experience because they have no single win condition other than stealing your own and that's just not fun gameplay so far as I'm concerned.
Dh for wild because odd dh is pure cancer. Possibly I'd argue about banning all mages instead, because quest is also cancer.
Standard: Either Rogue or Priest Wild: Either Priest or Warlock
Fairly sure the only reason people aren't saying DH, me included, is because it's a new class and other classes have been bothering us meta after meta.
Hunter, face hunter can make me irrationally angry with the game and is the only deck that will cause me to say 'yep, that's it for today'. The gnomes are incredibly oppressive and I dislike the fact that the game is on an immediate timer. Unless I'm running a deck to specifically try and counter it and they draw badly then I know I'm likely to lose.
Each to their own, I just don't see where the fun in that deck is at all. It's effective but the cards are boring and playing 50 games with it must feel so monotonous. I'm not a fan of not having much control over my input into the game and with the lack of healing about for a lot of classes, there can just be very few ways to handle it.
Interesting. When it comes to hunter I despise highlander but look forward to the face hunter one with the gnomes. Highlander just never has a weak point in the game imo.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
If you weren’t aware, in tournaments players get to ban another hero and can try and strategize with that ban.
if you could ban a hero before every match on ranked ladder who would you ban?
id ban hunter every time, regardless of my deck. I just find Hunter incredibly mindless lol. Would make the climb much more enjoyable.
my second van would be Mage. Just to much luck involved in that class.
Standard - Rogue
Wild - Priest
Wild : Warlock
Standard: Warrior
Always expect the unexpectable!
Standard : Warrior. bombs and pirates
I'd probably pick any deck that only has one real tough matchup and just ban that matchup tbh
That's Incredible!
Standard: Demon Hunter
Wild: Demon Hunter
Fully agree.
I expected to see a lot of DH and Priest. Surprised to see more warriors.
Noobs are yet to join the thread.
I'd say it would simply depend on the deck I'm playing. For the past week I've been playing a lot of Pure Paladin and the most annoying enemy is priest, since it's easy for them to drag me into a long fight and to out-value me in the end. However, I think an addition of something like you suggested is not healthy for the game, because the biggest fun is in the variety and basically by banning something like DH, you're not gonna have the chance to get satisfacton from beating them. These are just my thoughts, but since the majority of the community thinks in rather simplier terms, like "DH is too op, so I would always ban it" I think an opinion like mine is not really popular. However, if you've ever played League of Legends (for example), you have probably experienced something similiar. On low levels some champions, let's take Yasuo for example, are considered opressive and therefore they are banned in almost every single game. If you play on high level (lke Plat+) you should see that Yasuo is not really that strong, because other champions are much better, if you master them. Similiar to DH, Yasuo is just easy to learn, but that doesn't mean that he can't be beaten by other champs. If you look at meta statistics on HSreplay, you can see that there is great difference between the winrates of DH in low ranks and in high ranks. Therefore, sentences like "DH is stupid, just delete him" are pointless.
I definitely agree!!beating DH is so great lol. I always look forward to DH now. Only good card they’ve got is the 4/2 legendary and once that’s gone the game is over. It’s just an easy win imo. And hell, if I do lose then the games over in like 3minutes haha.
Standard: Priest
Wild: Druid
I don't really care about standard priest, it's just the most annoying of the current standard stuff imo, but I really hate all the different stupid uninteractive OTK bullshit druid works with in wild.
Haha that may be the case. Definitely saw more warriors the lower in diamond I got.
Standard: priest
Wild: dh
Priest for standard is simply because it's shit to play against them. Even when winning, it's an excruciatingly infuriating experience because they have no single win condition other than stealing your own and that's just not fun gameplay so far as I'm concerned.
Dh for wild because odd dh is pure cancer. Possibly I'd argue about banning all mages instead, because quest is also cancer.
Standard only - rogue.
I don't care mage is casino class, it's a rollercoaster game. Rogue is uncontested in mana cheating and value generation. HoF shadowstep
The class your deck has the worst match up against. Is that even a question?
Definitely Rogue right now. Having to play around six Dragonquen Alexstraszas is the largest impediment to being able to run a value control deck.
Standard: Either Rogue or Priest
Wild: Either Priest or Warlock
Fairly sure the only reason people aren't saying DH, me included, is because it's a new class and other classes have been bothering us meta after meta.
Hunter, face hunter can make me irrationally angry with the game and is the only deck that will cause me to say 'yep, that's it for today'. The gnomes are incredibly oppressive and I dislike the fact that the game is on an immediate timer. Unless I'm running a deck to specifically try and counter it and they draw badly then I know I'm likely to lose.
Each to their own, I just don't see where the fun in that deck is at all. It's effective but the cards are boring and playing 50 games with it must feel so monotonous. I'm not a fan of not having much control over my input into the game and with the lack of healing about for a lot of classes, there can just be very few ways to handle it.
I'd personally much rather play against priest.
Interesting. When it comes to hunter I despise highlander but look forward to the face hunter one with the gnomes. Highlander just never has a weak point in the game imo.