So demon hunter for what i undestand is getting 5 extra card per expansion this year are they just gonna have 15 extra class card next year? Seems kinda unfair if thats the case and if not which cards are they keeping?
So demon hunter for what i undestand is getting 5 extra card per expansion this year are they just gonna have 15 extra class card next year? Seems kinda unfair if thats the case and if not which cards are they keeping?
The Initiate Set (Cards like Altruis, Twin Slice etc.) are leaving with the Year of the Dragon Sets (RoS, SoU, and DoD), whereas any cards they get this year are leaving a year later.
So demon hunter for what i undestand is getting 5 extra card per expansion this year are they just gonna have 15 extra class card next year? Seems kinda unfair if thats the case and if not which cards are they keeping?
The Initiate Set (Cards like Altruis, Twin Slice etc.) are leaving with the Year of the Dragon Sets (RoS, SoU, and DoD), whereas any cards they get this year are leaving a year later.
Just to add, I think they will also cherry pick certain cards from the initiate set (and possibly other cards from the current and future expansions this year), to build the DH classic set. So some may become evergreen cards.
So demon hunter for what i undestand is getting 5 extra card per expansion this year are they just gonna have 15 extra class card next year? Seems kinda unfair if thats the case and if not which cards are they keeping?
The Initiate Set (Cards like Altruis, Twin Slice etc.) are leaving with the Year of the Dragon Sets (RoS, SoU, and DoD), whereas any cards they get this year are leaving a year later.
Just to add, I think they will also cherry pick certain cards from the initiate set (and possibly other cards from the current and future expansions this year), to build the DH classic set. So some may become evergreen cards.
Oh yeah. They said that was absolutely possible.
But I do wonder how many cards in their Classic Set will be cards we already have, and how many will be brand new DH cards?
The cards from the Initiate set are just fine to serve as the Basic / Classic set imo.
I don't think it is. The "problem" with Demon Hunter is not that it is strong. It is if this is their classic set they will have a deck that will keep them in tier 1 or 2 just by using them, no matter the meta. That would not be good. They should make the classic set weak like the rest of the classes so we don't have the same class in tier 1 forever
The cards from the Initiate set are just fine to serve as the Basic / Classic set imo.
I don't think it is. The "problem" with Demon Hunter is not that it is strong. It is if this is their classic set they will have a deck that will keep them in tier 1 or 2 just by using them, no matter the meta.
Hmm sound familiar, I know another class where your statement perfectly applys to....
The cards from the Initiate set are just fine to serve as the Basic / Classic set imo.
I don't think it is. The "problem" with Demon Hunter is not that it is strong. It is if this is their classic set they will have a deck that will keep them in tier 1 or 2 just by using them, no matter the meta. That would not be good. They should make the classic set weak like the rest of the classes so we don't have the same class in tier 1 forever
You mean like how Druids were forever? Hell they used to say that about Rogues and Mages.
They hall of famed/nerfed mage and Druid. Their classic set is not that strong and most of all their decks is not classic cards.
And Rouges classic set is not as strong as people claim. It is debatebly the best, but all the problematic Rouge cards are not in the classic set.
Just think if the Demon Hunters you see now is the classic set Demon Hunter. That would mean this Demon Hunter is the worst Demon Hunter will ever be. I don't think Demon Hunter is too strong atm, but it can not be a lot stronger than it is now
They hall of famed/nerfed mage and Druid. Their classic set is not that strong and most of all their decks is not classic cards.
And Rouges classic set is not as strong as people claim. It is debatebly the best, but all the problematic Rouge cards are not in the classic set.
Edwin VanCleef is easily and inarguably the best classic class legendary, Shadowstep is still around and Sap is STILL the strongest (because most cost efficient) Spell Hard removal, which Tempo wise only got surpassed by the best 1 Drop EVER printed since pre-nerfed Undertaker, which of course is Blackjack Stunner, probably the most ridicolous card in all of Standart right now.
They hall of famed/nerfed mage and Druid. Their classic set is not that strong and most of all their decks is not classic cards.
And Rouges classic set is not as strong as people claim. It is debatebly the best, but all the problematic Rouge cards are not in the classic set.
Edwin VanCleef is easily and inarguably the best classic class legendary, Shadowstep is still around and Sap is STILL the strongest (because most cost efficient) Spell Hard removal, which Tempo wise only got surpassed by the best 1 Drop EVER printed since pre-nerfed Undertaker, which of course is Blackjack Stunner, probably the most ridicolous card in all of Standart right now.
First of all Sap is a basic card and not in the classic set. Edwin is strong yes, and Shadowstep too, but Rouges play 3-4 classic set cards a most. And Blackjack is not a classic card or a basic card, so I dont see the relavance in this discussions.
If you see just the initaite set for Demon Hunter there are way more really strong cards. And there are more cards. You can pick the worst cards from that set and the powerlevel is still stronger than most classes. You even have a stronger legendary than Edwin.
Your argument so far is that Rouge is strong, I think you think they are too strong, so why would you ever want to make Demon Hunter stronger?
So demon hunter for what i undestand is getting 5 extra card per expansion this year are they just gonna have 15 extra class card next year? Seems kinda unfair if thats the case and if not which cards are they keeping?
The Initiate Set (Cards like Altruis, Twin Slice etc.) are leaving with the Year of the Dragon Sets (RoS, SoU, and DoD), whereas any cards they get this year are leaving a year later.
Ok i tought it would be like that but hoped that somehow blizz had thing planned out for next year, thanks anyway man.
Just to add, I think they will also cherry pick certain cards from the initiate set (and possibly other cards from the current and future expansions this year), to build the DH classic set. So some may become evergreen cards.
Oh yeah. They said that was absolutely possible.
But I do wonder how many cards in their Classic Set will be cards we already have, and how many will be brand new DH cards?
I personally don't think any will be new. Just cards released from the initiate set and the 3 expansion sets this year.
The cards from the Initiate set are just fine to serve as the Basic / Classic set imo.
I don't think it is. The "problem" with Demon Hunter is not that it is strong. It is if this is their classic set they will have a deck that will keep them in tier 1 or 2 just by using them, no matter the meta. That would not be good. They should make the classic set weak like the rest of the classes so we don't have the same class in tier 1 forever
Silver Hand Recruit
Hmm sound familiar, I know another class where your statement perfectly applys to....
Yes, EXCEPT that oh so familiar class, which of course is fvcking Rogue, the un-nerfable.
You mean like how Druids were forever? Hell they used to say that about Rogues and Mages.
They hall of famed/nerfed mage and Druid. Their classic set is not that strong and most of all their decks is not classic cards.
And Rouges classic set is not as strong as people claim. It is debatebly the best, but all the problematic Rouge cards are not in the classic set.
Just think if the Demon Hunters you see now is the classic set Demon Hunter. That would mean this Demon Hunter is the worst Demon Hunter will ever be. I don't think Demon Hunter is too strong atm, but it can not be a lot stronger than it is now
Silver Hand Recruit
Edwin VanCleef is easily and inarguably the best classic class legendary, Shadowstep is still around and Sap is STILL the strongest (because most cost efficient) Spell Hard removal, which Tempo wise only got surpassed by the best 1 Drop EVER printed since pre-nerfed Undertaker, which of course is Blackjack Stunner, probably the most ridicolous card in all of Standart right now.
First of all Sap is a basic card and not in the classic set. Edwin is strong yes, and Shadowstep too, but Rouges play 3-4 classic set cards a most. And Blackjack is not a classic card or a basic card, so I dont see the relavance in this discussions.
If you see just the initaite set for Demon Hunter there are way more really strong cards. And there are more cards. You can pick the worst cards from that set and the powerlevel is still stronger than most classes. You even have a stronger legendary than Edwin.
Your argument so far is that Rouge is strong, I think you think they are too strong, so why would you ever want to make Demon Hunter stronger?
Silver Hand Recruit
In every post I see of you, you actively insult rogues.
But your signature says you love them?
Oh the irony.... xD