I lost twice for them and I'm running a Midrange Hunter just 4fun (rank 11 atm). It's just funny how people tend to use w/e deck some famous YT says, lol.
I lost twice for them and I'm running a Midrange Hunter just 4fun (rank 11 atm). It's just funny how people tend to use w/e deck some famous YT says, lol.
Yeah, it is funny, but shouldn't be a surprise to anyone at this point. Just leave them, you really have no other alternative. This is something that will never change, NEVER.
Holy crap, so I assume that means 80% of the Metagame are Odd Mages.
I mean, if you played 10 games and 8 were these Mages, that means the whole Metagame is exactly the same.
It's totally not because you took an extremely low sample size of games and took a conclusion from that low sample, it is definitely because that 10 game sample size is statistically relevant.
I'll be right back, I just tossed a Coin 10 times, it came Heads 8 times, I gotta rewrite everything in Statistics because my clearly relevant sample size just proved Heads has more than 50% probability!
I agree the sample size of games is very low this time, but I also faced a considerable amount of Odd Mages recently (although I didn't count exactly how many :P). Let's wait a little longer to see what happens...
The deck is just fine, it's not insanely powerful but it's fairly decent and it has solid match-ups against 2 decks that people are playing after the nerfs which are midrange hunter and secret paladin and it's honestly a cool deck to play, it definitely feels fun. The only reason you don't see more of this deck is cause the priest match-up is absolutely miserable, the clone priest one is very unfavorable and the new Wall priest is borderline unwinnable.
Relax Diamond, that's not what the OP was saying at all, and your sarcasm is old, stale, and not at all productive.
Last thing this site needs is more of that garbage.
I'm using sarcasm to tell him he didn't take an appropriate sample to come to any conclusion. The sarcasm might be unproductive in your eyes, but is the message behind the sarcasm unproductive?
Comparing a coin toss probability with decks that might come up against thousand ones on the ladder isn't any smart. I'm just comparing the fact that people kept complaining about Spell Hunter and now Odd Mage (imo) has taken it's place. Just you wait.
Relax Diamond, that's not what the OP was saying at all, and your sarcasm is old, stale, and not at all productive.
Last thing this site needs is more of that garbage.
I'm using sarcasm to tell him he didn't take an appropriate sample to come to any conclusion. The sarcasm might be unproductive in your eyes, but is the message behind the sarcasm unproductive?
The point is not to prevent you from getting your point across, it's to prevent you from doing it in a way that is unnecessary and just outright rude. Sarcasm isn't necessarily a bad thing but it is very hostile to use it in this way.
It would be far more accurate to say that Odd Mage is the new Odd Rogue. At least if we are talking about the Secrets based Odd Mage. It has the same general game plan of Odd Rogue. And loses to the same decks, such as Odd Paladin.
Regardless, Diamond’s “sarcasm” is appropriate. Basing a statement on a cherry picked sample of 10 does not deserve a dignified response.
Relax Diamond, that's not what the OP was saying at all, and your sarcasm is old, stale, and not at all productive.
Last thing this site needs is more of that garbage.
I'm using sarcasm to tell him he didn't take an appropriate sample to come to any conclusion. The sarcasm might be unproductive in your eyes, but is the message behind the sarcasm unproductive?
The point is not to prevent you from getting your point across, it's to prevent you from doing it in a way that is unnecessary and just outright rude. Sarcasm isn't necessarily a bad thing but it is very hostile to use it in this way.
We live in a very hostile world, dude (it has always been like that, and always will be). DiamondDM13 post is a joke in comparison to the rudeness most people have to face every day in real life. So please, stop pretending it is not just to get the moderators' attention. Thank you. :)
Back on topic, and as I said before, let's wait some days to see what happens. It's too early to draw any conclusions or affirm anything...
It's just a good aggro deck. It's particularly good at punishing combo decks with it's secrets by wasting their limited resources.
I don't think it has any broken swingy cards like spellstone on 5. the deck is kind of like odd rogue in that if you can stop them from getting the early board and tempo advantage, they have to spend all their cards fighting to get it back only to get out valued in the late game.
I lost twice for them and I'm running a Midrange Hunter just 4fun (rank 11 atm). It's just funny how people tend to use w/e deck some famous YT says, lol.
The deck is just fine, it's not insanely powerful but it's fairly decent and it has solid match-ups against 2 decks that people are playing after the nerfs which are midrange hunter and secret paladin and it's honestly a cool deck to play, it definitely feels fun. The only reason you don't see more of this deck is cause the priest match-up is absolutely miserable, the clone priest one is very unfavorable and the new Wall priest is borderline unwinnable.
The secret version is pretty evenly matched with priest.
I mean, 10 matches today and I faced 8 Odd Mages with the SAME deck. What is Blizzard going to do now? Nerf Ragnaros? lmao.
One word -> NOOBIES
I lost twice for them and I'm running a Midrange Hunter just 4fun (rank 11 atm). It's just funny how people tend to use w/e deck some famous YT says, lol.
well guess what...... people want to win , and odd mage isn't even close to nerf worthy ,
3.2.1 kill shot
Wait up until the meta starts to shift and counter it. I count on to see more silence and Big Game Hunter maybe.
Yeah, it is funny, but shouldn't be a surprise to anyone at this point. Just leave them, you really have no other alternative. This is something that will never change, NEVER.
Relax Diamond, that's not what the OP was saying at all, and your sarcasm is old, stale, and not at all productive.
Last thing this site needs is more of that garbage.
I agree the sample size of games is very low this time, but I also faced a considerable amount of Odd Mages recently (although I didn't count exactly how many :P). Let's wait a little longer to see what happens...
Why is someone shocked by the fact that once a top tier deck has been nerfed, another one will just take its place?
For what profit is it to a man, if he gains the world and loses his own soul?
I've seen more "wall priest" lately than odd mages. So to answer your question: no.
The deck is just fine, it's not insanely powerful but it's fairly decent and it has solid match-ups against 2 decks that people are playing after the nerfs which are midrange hunter and secret paladin and it's honestly a cool deck to play, it definitely feels fun. The only reason you don't see more of this deck is cause the priest match-up is absolutely miserable, the clone priest one is very unfavorable and the new Wall priest is borderline unwinnable.
Comparing a coin toss probability with decks that might come up against thousand ones on the ladder isn't any smart. I'm just comparing the fact that people kept complaining about Spell Hunter and now Odd Mage (imo) has taken it's place. Just you wait.
The point is not to prevent you from getting your point across, it's to prevent you from doing it in a way that is unnecessary and just outright rude. Sarcasm isn't necessarily a bad thing but it is very hostile to use it in this way.
That's Incredible!
It would be far more accurate to say that Odd Mage is the new Odd Rogue. At least if we are talking about the Secrets based Odd Mage. It has the same general game plan of Odd Rogue. And loses to the same decks, such as Odd Paladin.
Regardless, Diamond’s “sarcasm” is appropriate. Basing a statement on a cherry picked sample of 10 does not deserve a dignified response.
Bu-bu-bu-but I thought, that when we nerf all tier 1 decks, there won't be tier 1 decks anymore!!!
Same old story, people will find something to whine about, because it's the internet after all.
We live in a very hostile world, dude (it has always been like that, and always will be). DiamondDM13 post is a joke in comparison to the rudeness most people have to face every day in real life. So please, stop pretending it is not just to get the moderators' attention. Thank you. :)
Back on topic, and as I said before, let's wait some days to see what happens. It's too early to draw any conclusions or affirm anything...
It's just a good aggro deck. It's particularly good at punishing combo decks with it's secrets by wasting their limited resources.
I don't think it has any broken swingy cards like spellstone on 5. the deck is kind of like odd rogue in that if you can stop them from getting the early board and tempo advantage, they have to spend all their cards fighting to get it back only to get out valued in the late game.
Yeah midrange hunter isn't common at all.
The secret version is pretty evenly matched with priest.
I take hunter over mage all day long. Boring mages...