Just play a Secret Mage or an Aggro Paladin and pretend you're good at the game like everyone else that used those decks to reach Legend. Those decks are literally 95% auto-pilot, no brain decks, you literally can't go wrong.
The issue with this strategy is it punishes people like me who are better than most ppl they play against, but much less lucky. Those braindead decks require luck, whereas a higher skillcap deck such as combo priest or big mage may net more wins due to skill.
yes blizzard specifically put a line into their code to make you less lucky than other players. also how is playing a removal as big mage every turn until 9 not braindead..? sigh.
You haven't seen my games. Decided to start writing it down for documentation. 20 games last week as dude vs priest, and I faced 26 netherspite historians. Of the dragons I saw specifically from historian, 22 of those were duskbreakers. That is 84.61%. That is WELL above the average of 40% for class specific dragons. So please fucking tell me how I am making bad decisions, or playing so badly, when in a large sample size such as this, on average, I'd face that third duskbreaker 40% of the time only. https://www.reddit.com/r/CompetitiveHS/comments/7pqnan/analysis_on_netherspite_historian_on_dragon_priest/?st=jfbmjh4s&sh=3ebc31ff Is the math for dragons off netherspite historian. Please people try to understand not everyone has the same luck on their way to legend. As I said, 0-9 vs final boss facing mostly dumpster legend players, and even if I was the worst player ever as you guys suggest, I would win one of those games based off "average" RNG. Losing to barnes+Y'saaarj on 4 is not "fun" or interactive, nether is losing to three or four duskbreakers.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
"Blizzard is just a small indie game company" -Mathmachine
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
"Blizzard is just a small indie game company" -Mathmachine