Well it's not just that. They don't update that meta snapshot like at all. Last one was from first week of un'goro and then hunter quest was good...
They never did a snapshot the first week of un'goro. They waited a whole week, quest hunter wasn't even on the list. This kind of stuff just proves people think it's cool now to bash the snapshot for no reason.
Well now I see most of you didn't even see meta snapshot on first week of un'goro because it was on their site. It seems you are that kind of people who just think they know and have seen everything but actually didn't. Sorry but I can't argue with you if you don't even know what are you talking about.
Well it's not just that. They don't update that meta snapshot like at all. Last one was from first week of un'goro and then hunter quest was good...
They never did a snapshot the first week of un'goro. They waited a whole week, quest hunter wasn't even on the list. This kind of stuff just proves people think it's cool now to bash the snapshot for no reason.
Well now I see most of you didn't even see meta snapshot on first week of un'goro because it was on their site. It seems you are that kind of people who just think they know and have seen everything but actually didn't. Sorry but I can't argue with you if you don't even know what are you talking about.
They did do a snap-shot for the first week of Un'Goro, but the Hunter Quest was never good - it wasn't even in their shapshot.
I prefer hughe data compilations like metastats which list a bigger variation of decks and can show me a shorter time periode like 4 days.
Tempo Storm always feels outdated at the time i read it and only lists the most common used deck lists, which are pretty limited. It is a nice tool but to limited for my preference.
I use both along with Disguised Toast's site. They all have their unique contributions as long as you know their flaws and value. If TS's meta report is dated or inaccurrate yet has a diamond in there to be found, not in the other site's, than it was worth a read. Just make sure you have a critical mind, not taking things as gospel, and don't limit yourself to limited sources of information.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I used to follow Tempostorm meta snapshot but after the whole Tempostorm/VS drama I realized VS is way better and more accurate.
I prefer hughe data compilations like metastats which list a bigger variation of decks and can show me a shorter time periode like 4 days.
Tempo Storm always feels outdated at the time i read it and only lists the most common used deck lists, which are pretty limited. It is a nice tool but to limited for my preference.
I use both along with Disguised Toast's site. They all have their unique contributions as long as you know their flaws and value. If TS's meta report is dated or inaccurrate yet has a diamond in there to be found, not in the other site's, than it was worth a read. Just make sure you have a critical mind, not taking things as gospel, and don't limit yourself to limited sources of information.