Just thought I'd start a thread for people to collect their thoughts on Hero rankings of the day. I am still on the learning curve (6,500ish) and looking for experience and advice to better learn/prioritize the Heros.
This is basically the ranking of which ones I would chose over others. There are still a couple Heros I have never used that I didn't include. What the heck is a recruitment map anyway?
According to ol' HSReplay, Zeph isn't that strong. But I agree with you that he's better than his stats at the moment suggest.
I personally think Barov is very bad, but some of that is because I'm mostly a mobile player and he's much more difficult to play without tracking and such.
Other than that, I think Cat and Deathwing are far better than you have them ranked, and some heroes like Alex and Jaraxxus are much worse.
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
Your title said roast. Don't talk to me about constructive criticism.
I guess I haven't figured out the magic of Curator yet. He seems to be an immediate bump to early game, meh midgame and long gone late game. Guess I need to look into how to use him better.
I have recently started playing Barov and have found him fairly easy to do better then 50% on. First you simply base it on the Hero then it switches to a matter of the Hero, rank and what cards you remember (I play on mobile too). So a decent win rate gets me excited to play him. Now the question still remains... do the extra coins make a significant difference. I think I need some more time with him to know. I think he is rate low because it takes someone who knows the advantages of the heros well to win more than you lose and the general pool may not.
Zeph is probably a bit high because he is new and I just want to play him to get to know him.
I think Tess is still getting an effectiveness boost from Elementals. I think even Edwin is too, since when cycling Elementals it becomes easy to throw some decent stats per turn for 1 on top of the other buffs.
Cat, Deathwing, Jaraxxus and Alex I barely play, guess I need to do so for better judgement.
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
Your title said roast. Don't talk to me about constructive criticism.
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
Your title said roast. Don't talk to me about constructive criticism.
Boy, do you really have to contaminate every thread with your negativity? You seem to have an unfulfilled life, don't you?
On the subject: barov is good when you can play with foresight.
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
Your title said roast. Don't talk to me about constructive criticism.
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
Your title said roast. Don't talk to me about constructive criticism.
Wasn't much of a roast either.
Wasn't trying to roast. It's a pointless post.
Halt doch einfach die Kokosnuss du verdammter Immelmann!
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
Your title said roast. Don't talk to me about constructive criticism.
Wasn't much of a roast either.
Wasn't trying to roast. It's a pointless post.
Halt doch einfach die Kokosnuss du verdammter Immelmann!
Bad title if you ask me... wants to get roasted then complains when he is lol
On the topic (10k player here) - Chenvalla, Chenvalla... way too high, Deathwing, Kragg, Curator way too low. I would actually pick any of last 3 heroes mentioned over Chenvalla.
Just thought I'd start a thread for people to collect their thoughts on Hero rankings of the day. I am still on the learning curve (6,500ish) and looking for experience and advice to better learn/prioritize the Heros.
This is basically the ranking of which ones I would chose over others. There are still a couple Heros I have never used that I didn't include. What the heck is a recruitment map anyway?
Omg so cool bro
According to ol' HSReplay, Zeph isn't that strong. But I agree with you that he's better than his stats at the moment suggest.
I personally think Barov is very bad, but some of that is because I'm mostly a mobile player and he's much more difficult to play without tracking and such.
Other than that, I think Cat and Deathwing are far better than you have them ranked, and some heroes like Alex and Jaraxxus are much worse.
Omg, thanks for the constructive comment, bro.
But on topic: I would pretty much agree with the placement of everything in T1, T2 and T5. T3 and T4 is where I might personally change a few of them up or down... but honestly, more often than not, I feel like you are going to be offered at least one of the heroes from T1 and T2 so at that point it might not even be worth it to be too picky about placement.
Barov at tier 2? Curator at t5? switch those 2 around. Curator is really good and has always been really good. Barov sucks alot.
Your title said roast. Don't talk to me about constructive criticism.
I guess I haven't figured out the magic of Curator yet. He seems to be an immediate bump to early game, meh midgame and long gone late game. Guess I need to look into how to use him better.
I have recently started playing Barov and have found him fairly easy to do better then 50% on. First you simply base it on the Hero then it switches to a matter of the Hero, rank and what cards you remember (I play on mobile too). So a decent win rate gets me excited to play him. Now the question still remains... do the extra coins make a significant difference. I think I need some more time with him to know. I think he is rate low because it takes someone who knows the advantages of the heros well to win more than you lose and the general pool may not.
Zeph is probably a bit high because he is new and I just want to play him to get to know him.
I think Tess is still getting an effectiveness boost from Elementals. I think even Edwin is too, since when cycling Elementals it becomes easy to throw some decent stats per turn for 1 on top of the other buffs.
Cat, Deathwing, Jaraxxus and Alex I barely play, guess I need to do so for better judgement.
"Omg so cool bro" > I ain't ur bro, bruh.
Wasn't much of a roast either.
Boy, do you really have to contaminate every thread with your negativity? You seem to have an unfulfilled life, don't you?
On the subject: barov is good when you can play with foresight.
Wasn't trying to roast. It's a pointless post.
Halt doch einfach die Kokosnuss du verdammter Immelmann!
Ragnaros it is still tier 1, IMHO.
I don't speak short bus
Bad title if you ask me... wants to get roasted then complains when he is lol
On the topic (10k player here) - Chenvalla, Chenvalla... way too high, Deathwing, Kragg, Curator way too low. I would actually pick any of last 3 heroes mentioned over Chenvalla.
This is obviously going nowhere other than nonsensical back and forth. I'll lock this down here so we can move on.