Can't they just take away his battlecry? The infuse ability would stay the same, the whole card would stay the same just no battlecry. The only reason I lose to a denathrius now is because of Brann. As a control player I haven't been safe with over 100 hp (warrior) multiple times, that's just silly in standard.
Without the battlecry, the infuse effect does nothing. He doesn't get bigger when he infuses; only the battlecry damage increases.
Do you not see how broken it is that you are amassing more than 100 health? It is absolutely correct for the game to have a way to counter that. You are not entitled to crush every opponent just because you are playing control.
Can't they just take away his battlecry? The infuse ability would stay the same, the whole card would stay the same just no battlecry. The only reason I lose to a denathrius now is because of Brann. As a control player I haven't been safe with over 100 hp (warrior) multiple times, that's just silly in standard.
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
Without the battlecry, the infuse effect does nothing. He doesn't get bigger when he infuses; only the battlecry damage increases.
Do you not see how broken it is that you are amassing more than 100 health? It is absolutely correct for the game to have a way to counter that. You are not entitled to crush every opponent just because you are playing control.
"Why, you never expected justice from a company, did you? They have neither a soul to lose nor a body to kick." -- Lady Saba Holland