this should probably be in the salt forum but holy crap i hate galakrond rogue. it wasn't even the zero cost cards that were a problem in this game it was the endless draconic lackeys that gave him 3 x Nozari. he also needed zilliax to save him so he did me a favor by top decking it and also used Kronx to heal twice with shadowstep.
If you're playing a deck where he was able to spend 30 mana on healing you both to full, and the point of your deck was to aggro him down and not win a value war, you need to revisit your deck.
If you're playing a deck where he was able to spend 30 mana on healing you both to full, and the point of your deck was to aggro him down and not win a value war, you need to revisit your deck.
i was playing handlock and he cleared all of my big threats with a bunch of discovered spells. my deck is fine. next time you feel like posting something that pointless go revisit your life.
And posts like this remind me that even with all the new cards coming soon, if Galakrond Rogue remains this powerful, the meta may not change as much as we'd hope.
And posts like this remind me that even with all the new cards coming soon, if Galakrond Rogue remains this powerful, the meta may not change as much as we'd hope.
Depressing.
Rogues does really poor against pure aggro/face decks, so DH should keep them in check. It will be even worse as they loose their only true healing card, which was zilliax. Galakrond rogue ist not an oppressive deck (check their winrates at hsreplay), but with so many rnd lackeys the deck is able to win almost any matchup.
this should probably be in the salt forum but holy crap i hate galakrond rogue. it wasn't even the zero cost cards that were a problem in this game it was the endless draconic lackeys that gave him 3 x Nozari. he also needed zilliax to save him so he did me a favor by top decking it and also used Kronx to heal twice with shadowstep.
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
If you're playing a deck where he was able to spend 30 mana on healing you both to full, and the point of your deck was to aggro him down and not win a value war, you need to revisit your deck.
You're right, this should be in the salt thread, that sucks, darn, case closed.
i was playing handlock and he cleared all of my big threats with a bunch of discovered spells. my deck is fine. next time you feel like posting something that pointless go revisit your life.
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
How can draconic lackey discover Nozari (paladin card) as ROGUE?
sorry more tiers to the rng. 3 zero cost nozari off 3 dragonqueen alexstraza.
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?
lol man, i am sorry, you got rekt
I feel your pain.
And posts like this remind me that even with all the new cards coming soon, if Galakrond Rogue remains this powerful, the meta may not change as much as we'd hope.
Depressing.
So, you say that the problem is this rogue healed too much from Nozari generated by Dragonqueen Alextrasza generated by Draconic Lackey.
In other words, it is not Galakrond Rogue that defeated you. It was RNG.
Rogues does really poor against pure aggro/face decks, so DH should keep them in check. It will be even worse as they loose their only true healing card, which was zilliax. Galakrond rogue ist not an oppressive deck (check their winrates at hsreplay), but with so many rnd lackeys the deck is able to win almost any matchup.
RNG
Keymaster Alabaster come faster
no other rogue deck can generate as many lackey's or zero cost cards they just happened to almost all be etheral and draconic lackeys
Google search: Is Hearthstone free to play?