I think it is completely unreasonable for Archivist Elysiana to be in the pool of cards that you can select from after playing her. Hex Lord Malacrass does not include himself in his hand reload, so there is precedent for the exclusion. It feels extremely unfair to play against. Is her whole pool all standard class and neutral cards? If so, blizzard should probably restrict it a bit and remove, at least, Elysiana and Malacrass from the card possibilities.
Lol, I didn't know that. Sounds like a bug. If not, Team5 should really look in to that - she should behave like Malacrass, as you said, not create an infinite value loop.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
The warrior mirror is getting so absurd. First, it was
Do I run Archivist in my deck?
Now the question is
Do I run Baleful Banker to get a second Archivist effect?
Soon it will be
Do I run 2 baleful bankers and 2 brewmasters in order to get 80 cards drawn in one game?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I think it is completely unreasonable for Archivist Elysiana to be in the pool of cards that you can select from after playing her. Hex Lord Malacrass does not include himself in his hand reload, so there is precedent for the exclusion. It feels extremely unfair to play against. Is her whole pool all standard class and neutral cards? If so, blizzard should probably restrict it a bit and remove, at least, Elysiana and Malacrass from the card possibilities.
Yeah, and every other card that doesn't let you win the game!
Lol, I didn't know that. Sounds like a bug. If not, Team5 should really look in to that - she should behave like Malacrass, as you said, not create an infinite value loop.
“If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exchange these apples then you and I will still each have one apple. But if you have an idea and I have an idea and we exchange these ideas, then each of us will have two ideas.” ― George Bernard Shaw
EU Legend: S52 (ZooHeal Lock); S76 (Highlander Hunter);
The warrior mirror is getting so absurd. First, it was
Do I run Archivist in my deck?
Now the question is
Do I run Baleful Banker to get a second Archivist effect?
Soon it will be
Do I run 2 baleful bankers and 2 brewmasters in order to get 80 cards drawn in one game?
Helpful Clarification on Forbidden Topics for Hearthstone Forums:
Enjoying Americans winning in the Olympics is forbidden because it is political. A 14 plus page discussion of state-sponsored lawsuits against a multi-national corporation based on harassment, discrimination, and wrongful death allegations is apparently not political enough to raise an issue.