I'm thinking about making a handlock deck but does not have jarraxus atm. I feel like playing the deck for a while to see if I like it before throwing in 1600 dust, can anyone tell me if not having jarraxus is a big deal? Thanks
Jaraxxus is a win condition in control matchups. That being said, there are a lot of lists without him, so he's not mandatory. (Some lists run Ragnaros, if you have him)
I don't think Alex is really a win condition on her own, more of a setup. Rag is a good option as mentioned above, and Ysera is always a decent choice.
In my opinion Jaraxxus isn't necessary, but it does give a huge bump in power level, and you will definitely find him worth the investment if you enjoy Handlock even without him.
Hi,
I'm thinking about making a handlock deck but does not have jarraxus atm. I feel like playing the deck for a while to see if I like it before throwing in 1600 dust, can anyone tell me if not having jarraxus is a big deal? Thanks
edit: sorry for typo in title -____-
Find a list that doesn't use him, or simply sub in another big powerful legendary. Even rafaam would be good as it could catch people off-guard.
ง ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)ง This is our town, SCRUB! (ง ͠° ͟ʖ ͡°)ง
-(ง •̀_•́)ง Ready sir! (ง •̀_•́)ง
I don't think Alex is really a win condition on her own, more of a setup. Rag is a good option as mentioned above, and Ysera is always a decent choice.
In my opinion Jaraxxus isn't necessary, but it does give a huge bump in power level, and you will definitely find him worth the investment if you enjoy Handlock even without him.
Trying Real Hard To Keep Hunter Relevant
vely rerirant
I dont like Alex for handlock. I feel Jaraxxus brings a lot more to the deck. I know some list dont run it tho
I like having Jaraxxus, is a extremely fun card. Cant put a price on those emotes