⚙
Learn More
Cosmetics
Related Cards
Card Pools
✕
×
PopCard Settings
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Elements settings
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
Click on the buttons to change the PopCard background.
Click on the button to hide or unhide popcard elements.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Card Design Championdon't forget, that the void ripper also requires a space on the board, in order to be played
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Card Design ChampionOmg so much replies :O
I do agree that Cubelock is struggling atm, but I wouldn't call the deck bad. Meta shifted to midrange and Razakus is still the top deck to run around with, so Cube is having a hard time. I think it might stick though.
The problem is, what I've found out recently, that I'm capable of out-valueing Cubelock with Spiteful Dragon Priest, which is crazy... As much as I think this deck has potential, I do agree it's not the beast thing to ladder with, so +1 to you guys.
I've no clue what I'm doing...
the smartest thing to do would be to play what isn't popular. if everyone is playing cubelock, everyone else techs against it.. so play what they are not geared up to directly counter.
harder said than done, but this is how the meta is formed. People play one thing, others counter it, and so on.
I know that cubelock will remain strong, it will just evolve further. And besides it looks to be in a good place next meta if they do not purposely gimp it. It only stands to loose one possible card, and if it gets further support, it could become the next raza P.
Personally I'm not playing cubelock at the mment because it became too popular. I plan on coming back to it though at some point.
I mean I run other warlock decks that use cubes as well that are still doing great. it really throws people of when they are expecting a DG combo that never comes.. I really need some mountain giants though to help with priests before I delve back into warlock... I suggest you do the same if you plan on playing the class.
also the treachery+howlfiend+defile combo is popping up a lot right now, this deck doesn't run any of that handlock or cube stuff.
pardon me.... but how is Cube rubbish or struggling? It's one of the number ONE decks out there right now! yes it costs a shit-ton of dust to make but still. Its up there with OG miracle Rogue.. just because you cant pilot it doesn't mean it sucks.
Phant4sm#1722
Cube warlock is basically rubbish, so no.
Free to try and find a game, dealing cards for sorrow, cards for pain.
Umbra isn't run in all lists. It's not a mandatory craft.
Personally I like Zalae's version of Cubelock, and his current list does not run Umbra.
-
View User Profile
-
View Posts
-
Send Message
Card Design ChampionDannyJi
K, how about making the deck less greedy and excluding the giants?
Imho they are totally unnecessary, if some of the users here manage to get wins against Raza, then fine, but I personally prefer a less greedy approach (or better said less clumsy), so I don't bother adding them just for one MU.
you need to cube a DG, then taldaram the cube, then have 2 faceless the next turn to copy the taldaram one twice, and be able to pop them all that turn with a hellfire. This is very hard to pull off.
The umbra combo is much sinpler and I was doing it every 3 games on average as you have so much card draw.
I understand the handlock version probably has a ton more smaller combos that are fun to play, but I prefer the control variant that just has the umbra combo + taldaram as a tech card, then runs a rin control deck with void daddies for the other half.
I guess everyone has their own favourite version though, and I haven't actually played with the giants and the faceless. If I had those cards I'd just play a handlock control deck though, over using them in cubelock.