I really like the idea. I do think that the deck has too many high cost minions. Try adding bloodbloom and violet illusionist. Im also not sure if thalnos is good enough to run in this deck.
Thalnos is so good right now. The high drops aren't too much of a problem because you're likely to make it that long with the new tools warlock got. I think that Bane of Doom is not the best card though, and I'm curious why no Sunfury Protector or Defender of Argus?
Looks solid enough. Though Bane of Doom seems a bit risky, considering it can summon Howlfiend. I've always loved that card, even though it's power level is questionable. But at this point I can't risk playing it in anything else than Questlock / Discolock.
I dont think Bloodmage Thalnos is good enough for the deck and I've also cut Mountain Giant cause you really have to survive the first turns against aggro, that's why I want to try Spreading Madness but I dont have so much hope about the card.
Couldn't felguard potentially be better than tar creeper in the highlander list? Extra defensive minion to get off bloodreaver, doesn't need krul as much as felhound and doomguard either
I agree that Thalnos is good and necessary, but.. How does a 15 health reset and filling your board with demons to resummon equal 'strong anti-synergy' ?
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
I hope warlock it's getting better this expansion .
What do you think about this deck I put together ?
I really like the idea. I do think that the deck has too many high cost minions. Try adding bloodbloom and violet illusionist. Im also not sure if thalnos is good enough to run in this deck.
Thalnos is so good right now. The high drops aren't too much of a problem because you're likely to make it that long with the new tools warlock got. I think that Bane of Doom is not the best card though, and I'm curious why no Sunfury Protector or Defender of Argus?
I like it.. I like it a lot. Hopefully there's enough sustainability to stay alive long enough to play Krul the Unshackled and Bloodreaver Gul'dan
Looks solid enough. Though Bane of Doom seems a bit risky, considering it can summon Howlfiend. I've always loved that card, even though it's power level is questionable. But at this point I can't risk playing it in anything else than Questlock / Discolock.
Thanks for all your replies guys . Maybe together we'll be able to make warlock great again :) .
Btw I theorized one more deck - discard warlock , a more control version . What do you think about this one ?
Hi! This is my take on the deck:
I didn't put Primordial Drake but it probably should fit in someone, I've put The Black Knight because in the first days literally everyone will try The Lich King --> Value
I dont think Bloodmage Thalnos is good enough for the deck and I've also cut Mountain Giant cause you really have to survive the first turns against aggro, that's why I want to try Spreading Madness but I dont have so much hope about the card.
Btw why no Lord Jaraxxus?
Warrior: 1007 Wins| Shaman: 1000 Wins | Rogue: 1005 Wins | Paladin: 1479 Wins | Hunter: 1186 Wins| Druid: 1225 Wins | Warlock: 1966 Wins | Mage: 1000 Wins | Priest: 701 Wins| Demon Hunter: 47 Wins
Legend: S10, S22, S25, S41, S45, S47, S48, S72
Couldn't felguard potentially be better than tar creeper in the highlander list? Extra defensive minion to get off bloodreaver, doesn't need krul as much as felhound and doomguard either
Thalnos is insane with defile and has good synergy with other spells too .
Lord Juraxxus has strong anti synergy with DK hero .
I agree that Thalnos is good and necessary, but.. How does a 15 health reset and filling your board with demons to resummon equal 'strong anti-synergy' ?