Why? Nobody will take it seriously anyway. It's understood that everything said about the meta after BRM is pure speculation. As if anyone is gonna PM you and say "hey rmb you said that Rogue will be the best control class after BRM? Lol u noob u wrong neener neener!".
i don't see the need to be "very careful".
**Points at Trump**
So you'll be wrong, but in some cases, you'll never live it down.
Why? Nobody will take it seriously anyway. It's understood that everything said about the meta after BRM is pure speculation. As if anyone is gonna PM you and say "hey rmb you said that Rogue will be the best control class after BRM? Lol u noob u wrong neener neener!".
i don't see the need to be "very careful".
**Points at Trump**
So you'll be wrong, but in some cases, you'll never live it down.
But he is not Trump. And we are talking about posting something on a forum, not broadcasting your views on twitch.
Obama needs to be very careful before he says something. The Pope needs to be careful before he says something. BrooklynHS DOES NOT need to be careful before posting something on a public forum about a game.
If there is anything I learned from GvG launch, 99% of the HearthPwn player base will be dead wrong about what new card pools will do to the meta. I mean, for about a month after launch Rogue was thought to be the worst class in the game, look at it now. A few forums posters compared to 25 million independent minds, it's a beast of a process, things change so quickly.
I really would like to see the next card be something that interacts well with their first card. I wouldn't doubt that it will, and that might be a reason Blizzard is doing 2 new class cards each. One is like meh, doesn't change too much, maybe just sub it out for such and such. But two, they can really add some game changers if they work together. Thats what they stated they wanted anyways. ^.^
All men dream, but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds, wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible. - T. E. Lawrence
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
**Points at Trump**
So you'll be wrong, but in some cases, you'll never live it down.
This space intentionally left blank.
But he is not Trump. And we are talking about posting something on a forum, not broadcasting your views on twitch.
Obama needs to be very careful before he says something. The Pope needs to be careful before he says something. BrooklynHS DOES NOT need to be careful before posting something on a public forum about a game.
"Put your face in the light!" - Tirion Fordring
Another "Overload Matters" card would be superb - something along the lines of Unbound Elemental, perhaps?
I'd love to see a Shaman Legendary along the lines of 6 mana for a 4/7 with "Whenever you play a card with Overload, gain 2 life and draw a card".
If there is anything I learned from GvG launch, 99% of the HearthPwn player base will be dead wrong about what new card pools will do to the meta. I mean, for about a month after launch Rogue was thought to be the worst class in the game, look at it now. A few forums posters compared to 25 million independent minds, it's a beast of a process, things change so quickly.
I really would like to see the next card be something that interacts well with their first card. I wouldn't doubt that it will, and that might be a reason Blizzard is doing 2 new class cards each. One is like meh, doesn't change too much, maybe just sub it out for such and such. But two, they can really add some game changers if they work together. Thats what they stated they wanted anyways. ^.^
All men dream, but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds, wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act on their dreams with open eyes, to make them possible. - T. E. Lawrence