IMO Questing Adventurer is just better. Yes, it's 3 mana vs the 1 mana Anomaly - but that 2 attack a dealbreaker for me. As long as you can get a Questing under a Conceal it's GG pretty soon after.
I've tested it a bunch, and I don't really like it.
Getting a 2/6 can be nice, but its actual purpose in the deck, dealing with early aggression is poor.
2 attack can't clear anything important, if it grew in attack it would be a much stronger choice for Rogue, but then it would just be Mana Wyrm, most classes can just ping it off or weapon it, or trade with their early minion like a tunnel trogg no problem.
Argent Squire just performs better, because of the divine shield, it's far more flexible.
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
Anyone tried it? I think it might be good enough. I know that some lists run argent squire, maybe put arcane anomaly instead?
Valar Morghulis
IMO Questing Adventurer is just better. Yes, it's 3 mana vs the 1 mana Anomaly - but that 2 attack a dealbreaker for me. As long as you can get a Questing under a Conceal it's GG pretty soon after.
I've tested it a bunch, and I don't really like it.
Getting a 2/6 can be nice, but its actual purpose in the deck, dealing with early aggression is poor.
2 attack can't clear anything important, if it grew in attack it would be a much stronger choice for Rogue, but then it would just be Mana Wyrm, most classes can just ping it off or weapon it, or trade with their early minion like a tunnel trogg no problem.
Argent Squire just performs better, because of the divine shield, it's far more flexible.