only 6 games? that’s not enough to prove your point, need more data
unless you’re trolling, then you’re absolutely right, priest is flooding your ranked matches because RNG is a lie, Blizzard manipulates to make ladder easier to p2w players lol
Played 6 libram pally games. 1 aggro dh, 1 mirror match, 2 priests (one of whom afked after 2 turns and gave me a free win),1 highlander hunter, 1 zoolock.
What exactly are they modifying there? Because that pattern must be way too bigbrain for me
Played 6 libram pally games. 1 aggro dh, 1 mirror match, 2 priests (one of whom afked after 2 turns and gave me a free win),1 highlander hunter, 1 zoolock.
What exactly are they modifying there? Because that pattern must be way too bigbrain for me
The guy is just salty. No big scheme here friend :)
If you play control deck, you have bigger chance to face another control deck. That's how matchmaking works.
sure buddy, and your proof of that?
how about you aggregate 10 million games and show me some graphs, calculations.. you know an actual proof for that?
the only thing that matchmaker takes into account when looking for opponents are your MMR and rank, nothing else
if there was really some rigging happening, sites like hsreplay or vicious syndicate would have found that ages ago, coz they actually have info on millions of games that have happened over the last few years, just like how quickly we learned about pity timer existence and then Blizz had to go out and confirm it
people should really try to read more about Confirmation Bias and Dunning-Kruger effect
The irony in the OP's IQ jab..... Its always the ignorant, stupid people who are the most arrogant about believing they are correct.
I played multiple priest games last night and not one mirror. I played a mixture against rogue, shaman, demon hunter and hunter with a couple of warlock and mage thrown in. Oh and one pure pally opponent.
If you play control deck, you have bigger chance to face another control deck. That's how matchmaking works.
sure buddy, and your proof of that?
how about you aggregate 10 million games and show me some graphs, calculations.. you know an actual proof for that?
the only thing that matchmaker takes into account when looking for opponents are your MMR and rank, nothing else
if there was really some rigging happening, sites like hsreplay or vicious syndicate would have found that ages ago, coz they actually have info on millions of games that have happened over the last few years, just like how quickly we learned about pity timer existence and then Blizz had to go out and confirm it
people should really try to read more about Confirmation Bias and Dunning-Kruger effect
They won't though. We've never had so much easy access to information and yet we're seemingly worse informed than ever before.
Personally I blame a mixture of social media being the source of information for seemingly so many people and so you've got the blind leading the blind on all sorts of issues and it seems most education systems aren't relevant to the current world/society. It still leans so much on temporarily remembering information that's thrown at you, passing a test and forgetting a large amount of the information because its not relevant to daily life.
General life education, epistemology, critical thinking etc should replace absolute nonsense like religious studies which help keep the world ignorant.
Doesn't help that people want evidence that matches their agenda which is why people like the OP seem satisfied with a data sample of 6 games. No one remotely interested in actual evidence would consider that anywhere close to a reasonable amount of data.
But it suits their agenda so it's enough for them. You'd see people like this quickly change their standard of evidence if it was a disciplinary or court case against them.
Usual “please provide proof” responses and all that sh*t like we are stupid and cannot notice that matchmaking is forced.
oh and it’s also documented in activision’s patent in case you need proof. Now give us your proof that matches are random pls
Nobody said that they were completely random mate. They are based on your winrates and rank. What there's no proof of is that it's based on your deck strategy. Look at my previous posts. 135 games with warrior. Only Demon hunter standing out, since it's the most popular class. Now I would assume rouge will take over. The class is strong, aggressive and did well doing the world championship. Yesterdays games seems to support that theory
ATTACHMENTS
jeezherewegobomb
Rollback Post to RevisionRollBack
To post a comment, please login or register a new account.
True! It just feels way too good when you send a big crap straight down the drain ;)
only 6 games? that’s not enough to prove your point, need more data
unless you’re trolling, then you’re absolutely right, priest is flooding your ranked matches because RNG is a lie, Blizzard manipulates to make ladder easier to p2w players lol
Played 6 libram pally games. 1 aggro dh, 1 mirror match, 2 priests (one of whom afked after 2 turns and gave me a free win),1 highlander hunter, 1 zoolock.
What exactly are they modifying there? Because that pattern must be way too bigbrain for me
The guy is just salty. No big scheme here friend :)
If you play control deck, you have bigger chance to face another control deck. That's how matchmaking works.
sure buddy, and your proof of that?
how about you aggregate 10 million games and show me some graphs, calculations.. you know an actual proof for that?
the only thing that matchmaker takes into account when looking for opponents are your MMR and rank, nothing else
if there was really some rigging happening, sites like hsreplay or vicious syndicate would have found that ages ago, coz they actually have info on millions of games that have happened over the last few years, just like how quickly we learned about pity timer existence and then Blizz had to go out and confirm it
people should really try to read more about Confirmation Bias and Dunning-Kruger effect
Usual “please provide proof” responses and all that sh*t like we are stupid and cannot notice that matchmaking is forced.
oh and it’s also documented in activision’s patent in case you need proof. Now give us your proof that matches are random pls
The irony in the OP's IQ jab..... Its always the ignorant, stupid people who are the most arrogant about believing they are correct.
I played multiple priest games last night and not one mirror. I played a mixture against rogue, shaman, demon hunter and hunter with a couple of warlock and mage thrown in. Oh and one pure pally opponent.
What's your point?
They won't though. We've never had so much easy access to information and yet we're seemingly worse informed than ever before.
Personally I blame a mixture of social media being the source of information for seemingly so many people and so you've got the blind leading the blind on all sorts of issues and it seems most education systems aren't relevant to the current world/society. It still leans so much on temporarily remembering information that's thrown at you, passing a test and forgetting a large amount of the information because its not relevant to daily life.
General life education, epistemology, critical thinking etc should replace absolute nonsense like religious studies which help keep the world ignorant.
Doesn't help that people want evidence that matches their agenda which is why people like the OP seem satisfied with a data sample of 6 games. No one remotely interested in actual evidence would consider that anywhere close to a reasonable amount of data.
But it suits their agenda so it's enough for them. You'd see people like this quickly change their standard of evidence if it was a disciplinary or court case against them.
Oh jeez here we go again....
1st pic: Bomb Warrior
2nd pic: Fatigue Control warrior
Where are my bonus control match-ups mate?
Nobody said that they were completely random mate. They are based on your winrates and rank. What there's no proof of is that it's based on your deck strategy. Look at my previous posts. 135 games with warrior. Only Demon hunter standing out, since it's the most popular class. Now I would assume rouge will take over. The class is strong, aggressive and did well doing the world championship. Yesterdays games seems to support that theory